Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring sex differences in human health risk assessment for PFNA and PFDA using a PBPK model

  • Toxicokinetics and Metabolism
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor, News and Views to this article was published on 22 November 2019

A Letter to the Editor, News and Views to this article was published on 29 August 2019

Abstract

Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), which are classified as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), have been widely used in industrial applications as a surface protectant. PFASs have been detected in wildlife and in humans around the globe. The purposes of this study are to develop and validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for detecting PFNA and PFDA in male and female rats, and to apply the model to a human health risk assessment regarding the sex difference. A PBPK model of PFNA and PFDA was established based on an in vivo study in male and female rats. Analytes in biological samples (plasma, nine tissues, urine, and feces) were determined by ultra-liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) method. PFNA and PFDA showed a gender differences in the elimination half-life and volume of distribution. The tissue–plasma partition coefficients were the highest in the liver in both male and female rats. The predicted rat plasma and urine concentrations simulated and fitted were in good agreement with the observed values. The PBPK models of PFNA and PFDA in male and female rats were then extrapolated to a human PBPK model based on human physiological parameters. The external doses were calculated at 3.35 ng/kg/day (male) and 17.0 ng/kg/day (female) for PFNA and 0.530 ng/kg/day (male) and 0.661 ng/kg/day (female) for PFDA. Human risk assessment was estimated using Korean biomonitoring values considering the gender differences. This study provides valuable insight into human health risk assessment regarding PFNA and PFDA exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC inf :

Area under the concentration–time curve from zero to infinity

CL :

Clearance

C max :

Maximum plasma concentration

C ss :

Steady-state concentration

F r :

Free fraction in plasma

IV:

Intravenous

Kp:

Tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient

K st :

Rate constant to storage compartment

K t :

Transporter affinity constant

K u :

Urinary elimination rate constant

MOE:

Margin of exposure

NOAEL:

No-observed-adverse-effect level

PBPK:

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model

PFASs:

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances

PFHxS:

Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid

PFDA:

Perfluorodecanoic acid

PFNA:

Perfluorononanoic acid

PFOA:

Perfluorooctanoic acid

PFOS:

Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid

PK:

Pharmacokinetic

POD:

Point of departure

t 1/2 :

The elimination half-life

TDI:

The tolerable daily intake

T m :

Transport maximum

UF:

Uncertainty factor

UFA :

Uncertainty factor for interspecies extrapolation from rats to humans

UFH :

Uncertainty factor for inter-individual variability in humans

UFS :

Uncertainty factor for subchronic to chronic extrapolation

V d :

Volume of distribution

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2014–2017 (14162MFDS703 and 17162MFDS117).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hea-Young Cho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, SJ., Choi, EJ., Choi, GW. et al. Exploring sex differences in human health risk assessment for PFNA and PFDA using a PBPK model. Arch Toxicol 93, 311–330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2365-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2365-y

Keywords

Navigation