Advertisement

Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 92, Issue 6, pp 2077–2091 | Cite as

Particulate matter 2.5 damages skin cells by inducing oxidative stress, subcellular organelle dysfunction, and apoptosis

  • Mei Jing Piao
  • Mee Jung Ahn
  • Kyoung Ah Kang
  • Yea Seong Ryu
  • Yu Jae Hyun
  • Kristina Shilnikova
  • Ao Xuan Zhen
  • Jin Woo Jeong
  • Yung Hyun Choi
  • Hee Kyoung Kang
  • Young Sang Koh
  • Jin Won Hyun
Open Access
In vitro systems

Abstract

The skin is the largest organ of the human body and the one mostly exposed to outdoor contaminants. To evaluate the biological mechanisms underlying skin damage caused by fine particulate matter (PM2.5), we analyzed the effects of PM2.5 on cultured human keratinocytes and the skin of experimental animals. PM2.5 was applied to human HaCaT keratinocytes at 50 µg/mL for 24 h and to mouse skin at 100 µg/mL for 7 days. The results indicate that PM2.5 induced oxidative stress by generating reactive oxygen species both in vitro and in vivo, which led to DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and protein carbonylation. As a result, PM2.5 induced endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial swelling, and autophagy, and caused apoptosis in HaCaT cells and mouse skin tissue. The PM2.5-induced cell damage was attenuated by antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine, confirming that PM2.5 cellular toxicity was due to oxidative stress. These findings contribute to understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms triggered in the skin by PM2.5, among which oxidative stress may play a major role.

Keywords

PM2.5 Oxidative stress Apoptosis Endoplasmic reticulum stress Mitochondrial damage Autophagy 

Introduction

Global air pollution has become a major threat to human health. This worldwide problem is especially relevant to the release of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which has the aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 µm and originates from incomplete coal combustion and diesel vehicle exhaust in Korea (Lee et al. 2005; Jung et al. 2017). In recent years, the relationship between PM2.5 production and public health hazards has attracted an increasing attention. Several toxicological and epidemiological studies have suggested that PM2.5 exerts negative biological effects on several major organs, including the lung (Liu et al. 2017), immune system (Zhao et al. 2013), cardiovascular system (Du et al. 2016), and nervous system (Wang et al. 2017). Among the affected organs, the skin is the primary tissue exposed to ambient pollutants and, similar to the respiratory tract, presents an interface between the body and surrounding atmosphere.

PM2.5-carrying organic chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are highly lipophilic and easily penetrate the skin (Krutmann et al. 2014). PAHs are potent activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which is a ligand-dependent transcription factor expressed in keratinocytes and melanocytes (Fritsche et al. 2007; Jux et al. 2011). AhR activation by PAHs upregulates the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP1A1) involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics (Vogel et al. 2016) and promotes generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Costa et al. 2010). Accumulated evidence indicates that oxidative stress is a common mechanism of PM2.5-induced damage (Gualtieri et al. 2012; Kouassi et al. 2010). Recently, the effect of PM2.5 on the skin has attracted attention of both clinical dermatologists and basic scientists (Han et al. 2016; Li et al. 2017), who recognized ambient PM2.5 as a crucial risk factor in skin diseases. Thus, PM2.5 was shown to aggravate symptoms in children with allergic dermatitis and eczema (Song et al. 2011), and to promote inflammatory disorders, aging, androgenetic alopecia, and cancers of the skin (Kim et al. 2016).

Mitochondria are unique double-membrane subcellular organelles that provide energy through oxidative phosphorylation and participate in metabolic and genetic processes in the body. Once mitochondria are disrupted, their dysfunction leads to reduced generation of ATP and higher production of ROS. Mitochondria are targeted by environmental pollutants such as PM2.5 (Guo et al. 2017) and mitochondrial damage may be a critical part of the pathophysiological mechanisms induced by PM2.5 exposure. Oxidative stress has been shown to be an initiator and major contributor to both endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress (Hotamisligil 2010; Kaneto et al. 2005) and lysosome-mediated autophagy (Lee et al. 2012); however, the research on molecular pathways linking atmospheric PM2.5 and skin damage is limited. Although skin is the organ mostly exposed to PM2.5, the association of skin-damaging effects of PM2.5 with oxidative stress and dysfunction of subcellular organelles such as mitochondria, ER, and lysosomes is still not fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of PM2.5 on the induction of oxidative stress and structure of subcellular organelles using in vitro and in vivo models and explored the mechanisms underlying PM2.5 toxicity for the skin.

Materials and methods

Preparation of PM2.5

Diesel particulate matter NIST 1650b (PM2.5) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). PM2.5 stock solution (25 mg/mL) was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and sonicated for 30 min to avoid agglomeration of the suspended PM2.5 particles. Experiments were performed within 1 h of stock preparation to avoid variability in PM2.5 composition in solution.

Cell culture

Human HaCaT keratinocytes (Amore Pacific Company, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) were maintained at 37 °C in an incubator with a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco-modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and antibiotic–antimycotic (100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin B) (Gibco, Life Technologies Co., Grand Island, NY, USA).

Animal experiment

In vivo experiments were conducted using HR-1 hairless male mice (OrientBio, Kyungki-do, Republic of Korea) in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals at Jeju National University (Jeju, Republic of Korea) (permit number: 2017-0026). Mice were randomly divided into three groups (n = 4 each): control, and treated with PM2.5 or N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; Sigma-Aldrich) + PM2.5. PM2.5 was dispersed in propylene glycol to the concentration of 100 µg/mL, spread on a nonwoven polyethylene pad over a 1 cm2 area, and applied to the dorsal skin of mice for 7 consecutive days. At the end of the treatment, the exposed skin tissue was immediately dissected for histological and biochemical analysis as previously described (Lee et al. 2016).

ROS measurement

Cells were incubated with different concentrations of PM2.5 (25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/mL) for 24 h or treated with PM2.5 at a concentration of 50 µg/mL for different times (1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h). After staining with 25 µM 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) dye for 10 min, H2DCF fluorescence was detected by flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA, USA) and analyzed using the Cell Quest software. For imaging, cells were plated in a 4-well glass chamber slide, treated with 1 mM NAC and/or 50 µg/mL PM2.5, and analyzed for intracellular and mitochondrial ROS production after staining with H2DCFDA and dihydrorhodamin 123 (DHR 123; Molecular Probes), respectively, for 30 min. Images of stained cells were generated by confocal microscopy as previously described (Kim and Yoo 2016; Soeur et al. 2017). To detect ROS in zebrafish treated with NAC and/or PM2.5, they were incubated with 10 µM H2DCFDA for 30 min in the dark at 28.5 °C. After anesthesia with 1-phenoxy-2-propanol (1/500 dilution; Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA), the stained zebrafish were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss AX10, Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) (Jeong et al. 2017).

Hoechst 33342/propidium iodide (PI) staining

Cells were treated with different concentrations of PM2.5 (25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/mL) for 24 h or pre-treated with 1 mM NAC for 1 h and then treated with 50 µg/mL of PM2.5 for 24 h and then stained with DNA-specific fluorescent dyes Hoechst 33342 (10 µM) and propidium iodide (PI; 5 µg/mL) (both from Sigma-Aldrich). Cells with fragmented nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342 were considered apoptotic and those stained with PI were considered necrotic. Cell staining was visualized under a fluorescence microscope equipped with a CoolSNAP-Pro color digital camera (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA) and the proportions of apoptotic and neurotic cell were quantified.

Trypan blue assay

Cells were seeded in 35-mm culture dishes at a concentration of 1.0 × 105 per mL, cultured for 16 h, and treated with different concentrations of PM2.5 (25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/mL) for 24 h. Then, 5 µL of 0.1% trypan blue solution was added to 0.1 mL cell suspension for 5 min at room temperature, and the numbers of viable and dead cells were determined under a microscope using 10× magnification. Cell viability (%) was calculated as: unstained cells/(unstained cells + stained cells) × 100%.

Detection of 8-oxoguanine

Cellular DNA was isolated using the G-DEX™ IIc Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc., Sungnam, Kyungki-Do, Republic of Korea) and quantified by spectrophotometry. The amount of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG, the deoxyriboside form of 8-oxoG) in DNA was determined using the BIOXYTECH® 8-OHdG-EIA™ kit (OXIS Health Products, Inc., Portland, OR, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amount of 8-oxoG was also estimated by a fluorescence-binding assay: cells were fixed and permeabilized with ice-cold methanol for 15 min and 8-oxoG was visualized with avidin-TRITC conjugate (Sigma-Aldrich) under a confocal microscope (Piao et al. 2011).

Single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay)

Cell-coated slides were immersed in lysis buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na-EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 1% Trion X-100, and 10% DMSO, pH 10) for 1 h at 4 °C, subjected to electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and observed under a fluorescence microscope equipped with an image analysis software (Kinetic Imaging, Komet 5.5, UK) as previously described (Park et al. 2017). The percentage of the total fluorescence in the comet tail and the length of the tail was recorded in 50 cells per slide.

Lipid peroxidation assay

Cells were stained with 5 µM of a fluorescent probe diphenyl-1-pyrenylphosphine (DPPP; Molecular Probes) as described (Morita et al. 2016) and analyzed using an Olympus FV1200 laser scanning microscope equipped with the FV10-ASW viewer 4.2 software. Mouse skin tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using an antibody to 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) (Cosmo Bio Co., Tokyo, Japan).

Protein carbonylation

Total cellular proteins were extracted with lysis buffer and quantified by spectrophotometry, and protein carbonylation was determined using an OxiSelect™ protein carbonyl ELISA kit (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In tissues, protein carbonylation was assessed using an immunohistochemical staining kit (Cosmo Bio Co.)

Western blotting

Cell and mouse skin lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the separated proteins were transferred to membranes and incubated with primary antibodies against phospho-H2A.X (Ser139), CHOP, phospho-PERK, beclin-1, LC3B, caspase-3, and caspase-9 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), GRP78, Bax (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), phospho-IRE1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and actin (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by the incubation with a secondary antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Protein bands were detected using an Amersham Enhanced Chemiluminescence Plus Western Blotting Detection system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK).

ER staining

Cells were reacted with an ER-tracker blue-white DPX dye (Molecular Probes) for 30 min, and images were taken under a confocal microscope (Li et al. 2015).

Quantification of Ca2+ level

Cells were loaded for 30 min with 10 µM fluo-4-acetoxymethyl ester (Fluo-4-AM) or with Rhod-2 acetoxymethyl ester (Rhod-2 AM) (Molecular Probes) to detect intracellular and mitochondrial Ca2+, respectively, and fluorescence was measured by confocal microscopy (Wang et al. 2016).

Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) measurement

Mitochondrial Δψ was analyzed by confocal microscopy after staining with 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), a lipophilic cationic fluorescence dye (Yao et al. 2016).

Acridine orange staining

To analyze autophagy, cells were reacted with acridine orange (Invitrogen) for 15 min and fluorescence was measured using a fluorescence microscope (BH2-RFL-T3; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) (Farah et al. 2016). Depending on the acidity, autophagic lysosomes appeared as orange/red fluorescent cytoplasmic vesicles, while the nuclei were stained green.

LC3 transfection and detection of punctate LC3-positive structures

Membrane-bound microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) is present in the autophagic double-membrane structure, which is an important marker of autophagy (Fazeli and Wehman 2017). Cells were transfected with GFP-tagged LC3 using Lipofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and GFP-LC3 fluorescence was observed under a confocal microscope.

Histological analysis

Skin pieces were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5 µm sections, which were then deparaffinized and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The height of epidermis (from the stratum basale to the stratum corneum) was measured in ten randomly chosen fields from three representative sections per group by microscopy at 100× magnification using a digital camera. Immunohistochemistry was performed by incubating skin sections with primary anti-Bax antibody (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 1 h and the reaction was visualized using an ABC Elite kit (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin before mounting. For the in situ detection of apoptotic cells in skin sections, the DeadEnd colorimetric TUNEL system (Promega, Wisconsin, WI, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s recommendation.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Cells and tissues were fixed, dehydrated, incubated with increasing concentrations of propylene oxide dissolved in ethanol, and infiltrated with increasing concentrations of Eponate 812 resin. Samples were baked in a 65 °C oven overnight, sectioned in an ultramicrotome, and examined by TEM using a field electron emission unit (JEM-2100F, JEOL) at the Korean Basic Science Institute (Chuncheon, Republic of Korea).

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance of the difference between groups was determined by analysis of variance and Tukey’s tests using the SigmaStat version 3.5 software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). All data are presented as the mean ± standard error. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant difference.

Results

PM2.5 induced oxidative stress both in vitro and in vivo

To investigate the potential role of oxidative stress induced by PM2.5, we measured ROS generation and cellular damage in PM2.5-treated human keratinocytes and mouse skin. Figure 1a shows that PM2.5 treatment promoted the production of ROS in a dose-dependent manner as evidenced by H2DCFDA staining. Analysis of Hoechst 33342/PI staining indicated that PM2.5 at a concentration of 50 µg/mL induced apoptosis (Hoechst 33342-stained cells); however, at concentrations above 75 µg/mL, PM2.5 induced necrosis (PI-stained cells) (Fig. 1b). We used 50 µg/mL PM2.5 as the optimal concentration in further experiments. ROS generation was increased starting from 1 h up to 24 h of treatment with 50 µg/mL PM2.5 (Fig. 1c). Next, we determined whether PM2.5 induced cytotoxicity via ROS generation. An antioxidant NAC was not toxic for HaCaT cells at concentrations up to 1 mM (MTT test; data not shown); therefore, 1 mM NAC was used in this study. Confocal microscopy indicated that green fluorescence was increased in PM2.5-treated cells compared to control, but the effect was suppressed by 1 mM NAC (Fig. 1d), indicating that PM2.5 stimulated ROS production in keratinocytes. Furthermore, PM2.5 induced cytotoxicity as evidenced by trypan blue exclusion; however, 1 mM NAC reduced it (Fig. 1e), suggesting that PM2.5 caused cytotoxicity via ROS. We next evaluated the damage of intracellular macromolecules by PM2.5. The level of 8-oxoG, a hallmark of oxidative DNA damage, was measured based on 8-OHdG detection. The results indicated that PM2.5 promoted the generation of 8-oxoG in DNA in a time-dependent manner when used at 50 µg/mL (Fig. 1f) and in a dose-dependent manner when administered for 8 h (Fig. 1g). In addition, condensed 8-oxoG staining was observed in PM2.5-treated cells, whereas 1 mM NAC reduced it (Fig. 1h). The Comet assay assessing DNA breakage indicated that PM2.5 increased the presence of cellular DNA tails by 30% compared to control; however, NAC pre-treatment reduced it to 12% (Fig. 1i). Furthermore, fluorescence intensity of DPPP oxide, an indicator of lipid peroxidation, was enhanced in PM2.5-incubated cells but significantly reduced by NAC pre-treatment (Fig. 1j). Similarly, the level of protein carbonylation, a biomarker of oxidative stress-induced protein damage, was increased in PM2.5-treated cells, whereas NAC could prevent PM2.5-induced carbonyl formation (Fig. 1k). To validate these results in vivo, we used a zebrafish model. As shown in Fig. 1l, PM2.5 treatment also upregulated ROS production in zebrafish, which was attenuated by NAC. Finally, the results were confirmed in a mouse model, which showed that PM2.5 treatment induced DNA damage as indicated by the expression of phosphorylated histone H2A.X (Fig. 1m), and stimulated lipid peroxidation (Fig. 1n) and protein carbonylation (Fig. 1o) in mouse skin. Overall, these findings show that PM2.5 induced oxidative stress by enhancing ROS production, which resulted in the damage of cellular components.

Fig. 1

PM2.5 induces ROS production leading to oxidative damage. Cells were treated with PM2.5 at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. a ROS generation was assessed by the H2DCFDA assay. b Apoptotic and necrotic cells were detected by Hoechst 33342 and PI nuclear staining, respectively. Arrows indicate apoptotic bodies and red color indicates necrotic cells. c Cells were treated with 50 µg/mL PM2.5 for the indicated times and ROS generation was assessed by the H2DCFDA assay. Cells were pre-treated with NAC (1 mM) for 1 h and then treated with PM2.5 (50 µg/mL) for 24 h. d ROS levels were assessed by confocal microscopy after H2DCFDA staining. e Cell viability was analyzed by trypan blue exclusion. Cells were treated with 50 µg/mL PM2.5 f for the indicated times or g with the indicated concentrations of PM2.5 for 8 h and analyzed for the generation of 8-oxoG in DNA by avidin-TRITC binding using confocal microscopy. i DNA damage was evaluated by the Comet assay; representative images show comet tails and the graph shows quantification of cellular DNA damage. j Lipid peroxidation was analyzed by confocal microscopy after DPPP staining. k Protein oxidation was assayed by measuring carbonyl formation. l Zebrafish was pre-treated or not with NAC and then treated with PM2.5 (50 µg/mL) for 24 h, and analyzed for ROS production by H2DCFDA staining; zebrafish treated with H2O2 was used as a positive control. Mouse dorsal skin was treated with PM2.5 (100 µg/mL) for 7 days. m Tissue lysates were analyzed for H2A.X expression by immunoblotting; actin was used as loading control. n Immunohistochemistry of mouse tissue to analyze 4-HNE levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation; signals were detected in a peroxidase reaction (brown), and slides were counterstained with hematoxylin; magnification: ×400. o Protein carbonylation in mouse tissue was assessed using an immunohistochemical staining kit for protein carbonyls. *p < 0.05 compared to control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to PM2.5-treated groups. (Color figure online)

PM2.5-induced oxidative damage caused ER stress

We next investigated whether PM2.5 oxidative effects resulted in ER stress. PM2.5-treated cells were stained bright blue by the ER‑Tracker Blue-White DPX, indicating the induction of ER stress which was attenuated by NAC (Fig. 2a), suggesting that PM2.5 promoted ER stress through ROS generation. ER is a major intracellular Ca2+ reservoir, and disruption of Ca2+ homeostasis activates ER stress (Jakobsen et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2005). Confocal microscopy analysis revealed higher intensity of Ca2+ fluorescence in PM2.5-treated cells compared with control, but the effect was reduced by NAC (Fig. 2b). ER stress promotes the expression of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), which mediates apoptosis (Nishitoh 2012), and of the ER chaperone and signaling regulator GRP78, which activates protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK) through phosphorylation. In turn, phospho-PERK causes inhibition of translation and protein synthesis observed after ER stress (Bertolotti et al. 2000). As shown in Fig. 2c, PM2.5 induced the expression of ER stress-related proteins, including CHOP, GRP78, phospho-PERK, and phospho-serine/threonine-protein kinase/endoribonuclease inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) in a time-dependent manner. To confirm these results, we examined the induction of ER stress markers in mice treated with PM2.5 and found that the expression of GRP78 and CHOP was significantly increased in PM2.5-treated skin compared with control; however, NAC reversed the effect (Fig. 2d). These observations were consistent with those in vitro, suggesting that PM2.5-induced ER stress may be associated with oxidative stress.

Fig. 2

PM2.5 induces ER stress via ROS generation. a, b Cells were pre-treated or not with NAC (1 mM) for 1 h and then with PM2.5 (50 µg/mL) for 24 h and analyzed by confocal microscopy for ER stress using a ER-Tracker Blue-White DPX staining and for intracellular Ca2+ levels using b Fluo-4-AM staining. Representative confocal images are shown. Lysates of c cells and d mouse skin tissue were analyzed for the expression of CHOP, GRP78, phospho-PERK, and phospho-IRE1 by western blotting. Actin was used as loading control. *p < 0.05 compared to control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to PM2.5-treated groups

PM2.5-induced oxidative stress promoted mitochondrial damage

Confocal microscopy analysis showed that, in cultured human keratinocytes, ROS generation and Ca2+ overload in mitochondria were enhanced by PM2.5 treatment but reduced by NAC (Fig. 3a, b). Mitochondrial membrane permeability is associated with apoptosis through the release of cytochrome c and caspase activation (Chaudhary et al. 2016). A membrane-permeant dye JC-1 is widely used in apoptosis studies to monitor the status of mitochondria where JC-1 accumulates in a potential-dependent manner as indicated by a fluorescence emission shift from green (~ 529 nm) to red (~ 590 nm). Accordingly, mitochondrial polarization (healthy state) or depolarization (damaged state) can be revealed by an increase or decrease, respectively, in the red/green fluorescence intensity ratio (Lee et al. 2017). Confocal microscopy images showed that in control cells, mitochondria exhibited strong red JC-1 fluorescence indicative of Δψm polarization, which was reduced in PM2.5-treated cells where green fluorescence indicative of Δψm depolarization was increased; however, the effect was suppressed by NAC (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3

PM2.5 induces mitochondrial damage via ROS generation. Cells were pre-treated or not with NAC (1 mM) for 1 h and then with PM2.5 (50 µg/mL) for 24 h and analyzed by confocal microscopy to assess a mitochondrial ROS (DHR123 staining), b mitochondrial Ca2+ levels (Rhod-2 AM staining), and c Δψm (JC-1 staining). Lysates of d cells and e mouse skin tissue were analyzed for the expression of Bax protein by western blotting. f Mouse skin tissue was analyzed for Bax expression by immunohistochemistry. Nuclei were stained with hematoxylin; arrows indicate Bax. *p < 0.05 compared to control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to PM2.5-treated groups

It is known that proteins of the Bcl-2 family regulate apoptosis by controlling mitochondrial permeability. Therefore, we next examined whether PM2.5 affected the expression of Bax, a pro-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family. The results indicated that PM2.5 increased Bax levels in cultured human keratinocytes (Fig. 3d) as well as in mouse skin (Fig. 3e, f); however, NAC pre-treatment prevented PM2.5-induced upregulation of Bax expression (Fig. 3e, f). Cumulatively, these data indicate that PM2.5 increased oxidative stress in mitochondria by stimulating ROS production, which resulted in mitochondrial damage.

PM2.5-induced oxidative stress caused autophagy

We next determined whether PM2.5-induced oxidative stress could promote autophagy. In cultured keratinocytes, PM2.5 triggered accumulation of intracellular vacuoles indicative of autophagy, as evidenced by staining with a lysosome marker dye acridine orange (Fig. 4a). The two distinct steps of autophagy, autophagosome formation and autolysosome formation, can be discerned by the presence of LC3-phospholipid conjugates (Tanida et al. 2005). PM2.5-treated GFP-LC3-transfected cells had increased levels of GFP-LC3-positive puncta (Fig. 4b). In addition, PM2.5 upregulated the expression of beclin-1, the protein initiating autophagosome formation during autophagy, and LC3B-II, the processed form of LC3, in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 4c). These in vitro results were confirmed in PM2.5-treated mouse skin (Fig. 4d). However, the effects of PM2.5 both in cultured cell and animals were reversed by NAC (Fig. 4a, b, d), suggesting that PM2.5 increased autophagy through oxidative stress.

Fig. 4

PM2.5 induces autophagy via ROS generation. Cells were pre-treated or not with NAC (1 mM) for 1 h, treated with PM2.5 (50 µg/mL) for 24 h. a Cells were stained with acridine orange and analyzed for autophagy by fluorescence microscopy. b Cells were transfected with the GFP-LC3 expression construct and observed under a fluorescence microscope. Lysates extracted from c cells and d mouse skin tissue were analyzed for the expression of beclin-1 and LC3B-II proteins by western blotting; actin was used as loading control. *p < 0.05 compared to control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to PM2.5-treated groups. (Color figure online)

PM2.5-induced oxidative stress promoted apoptotic cell death

PM2.5 induced apoptosis both in cultured cells and mouse skin tissues, as shown by the formation of apoptotic bodies and DNA fragmentation revealed by Hoechst 33342 staining and TUNEL assay, respectively; however, NAC pre-treatment diminished the effects (Fig. 5a, b). Another evidence that PM2.5 promoted apoptosis was time-dependent increase in the expression of cleaved caspase-9 and caspase-3 (Fig. 5c), which indicated caspase activation in response to mitochondrial membrane disruption. Similar results were obtained for the mouse skin, where cleaved forms of caspase-3 and caspase-9 were upregulated in response to PM2.5 treatment; however, the effect was attenuated by NAC (Fig. 5d), suggesting that PM2.5 induced apoptosis via oxidative stress.

Fig. 5

PM2.5 induces apoptosis via ROS generation. a Cells were pre-treated or not with NAC (1 mM) for 1 h, treated with PM2.5 (50 µg/mL) for 24 h, and analyzed for apoptotic body formation after Hoechst 33342 staining; apoptotic bodies are indicated by arrows. b Mouse skin treated with NAC and PM2.5 (100 µg/mL) for 7 days was analyzed for apoptosis by TUNEL staining; TUNEL-positive cells are indicated by arrows. Lysates extracted from c cells and d mouse skin tissue were analyzed for the expression of caspase-3 and caspase-9 by western blotting. *p < 0.05 compared to control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to PM2.5-treated groups

PM2.5 internalization damaged the ultrastructure of mouse skin tissue

TEM analysis revealed PM2.5 internalization in HaCaT cells after 24 h of exposure to 50 µg/mL PM2.5 (Fig. 6a-2). In addition, to evaluate organelle ultrastructure in skin cells following PM2.5 exposure, we performed TEM analysis of mouse skin tissue after treatment with 100 µg/mL PM2.5. Compared to normal mice (Fig. 6b-1), skin tissue of PM2.5-treated mice showed increased swelling of mitochondria (Fig. 6b-2) and ER (Fig. 6b-3), and autophagosome formation (Fig. 6b-4), indicating that PM2.5 disrupted intracellular network in the skin.

Fig. 6

TEM analysis of HaCaT cell and mouse skin after PM2.5 treatment. a Cells were treated with 50 µg/mL PM2.5 for 24 h and analyzed for PM2.5 internalization (white arrow); 1 control, 2 internalized PM2.5. Scale bars: 1 and 2, 2 µm; 21, 1 µm. b Mouse skin treated or not with 100 µg/mL PM2.5 for 7 days. Compared to 1 normal untreated skin tissue, PM2.5-treated skin showed swelling of 2 mitochondria and 3 ER, and the presence of 4 autophagosomes. Scale bars, 1 and 3, 500 nm; 2 and 4, 2 µm

Discussion

According to the Air Korea site of Korea Environment Corporation (2015, 2016, 2017) of the National Environmental Research Institute of the Republic of Korea, the average concentrations of PM2.5 in the air of seven major Korean cities from January to March were 31, 28, and 29 µg/m3 in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively, exceeding the national environmental standard of 25 µg/m3.

Skin keratinocytes present the first barrier for environmental pollutants, and it was shown that PM exposure could upregulate pro-inflammatory mediators and AhR expression, leading to increased ROS generation in keratinocytes (Choi et al. 2011). Wei et al. (2017) demonstrated that organic extracts containing PAHs with PM2.5 induced stronger oxidative stress compared to those without PM2.5. It was also shown that PM2.5 may penetrate the skin and have harmful effects on viable skin cells, including keratinocytes (Krutmann et al. 2014; Li et al. 2017). A recent study demonstrated that PM2.5 could increase ROS production and inhibit the intracellular antioxidant system, which resulted in morphological changes and decreased viability of keratinocytes (Hu et al. 2017). Therefore, in the current study, we investigated the effects of oxidative stress induced by PM2.5 on keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo. Our data indicate that PM2.5 treatment promoted ROS generation (Fig. 1a, c) and caused structural damage, including DNA oxidation, lipid peroxidation, and protein carbonylation (Fig. 1f–k). Recent studies have shown that ER stress is associated with oxidative stress and that ROS may act as messengers between these processes (Cao and Kaufman 2014; Laing et al. 2010). Excessive ER Ca2+ release and mitochondrial Ca2+ overload further amplify oxidative stress (Ly et al. 2017). Therefore, we hypothesized that ROS overproduction induced by PM2.5 affected the ER which plays an important role in cellular quality control and sensitivity to oxidative stress. Abnormal ER stress is associated with autophagy-induced protein degradation and activation of cytotoxic processes such as apoptosis (Schrock et al. 2013), which may be a key mechanism underlying PM2.5 toxicity. GRP78 is a major ER chaperone critical for protein quality control in the ER and activation of ER transmembrane signaling molecules (Wang et al. 2009). GRP78 interacts with misfolded proteins and promotes their refolding, thereby playing an important role in regulating three ER transmembrane proteins: PERK, IRE-1α, and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) (Mei et al. 2013). Our data show that PM2.5 could induce IRE-1 phosphorylation, upregulate GRP78 and CHOP expression, and activate the ER stress pathway in human keratinocytes (Fig. 2c, d). Furthermore, ER stress is known to be strongly associated with the disruption of cellular Ca2+ homeostasis, and our results revealed that PM2.5-induced ER stress increased intracellular Ca2+ levels, which was inhibited by NAC (Fig. 2b).

Mitochondria are considered the main source of intracellular ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role in the pathogenesis and/or progression of various diseases. Our results demonstrate that PM2.5 induced structural alterations of mitochondria, including swelling, which can deregulate the functional activity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain and the production of ROS, and lead to mitochondrial damage, suggesting that PM2.5 exposure promotes oxidative stress through destruction of mitochondria.

Autophagy is a regulated process of degradation and recycling of dysfunctional organelles and proteins, which are sequestered into autophagosomes that subsequently fuse with lysosomes where the cargo is degraded by lysosomal hydrolases (Ryter et al. 2013); however, excessive autophagy can directly cause cell death (Fulda and Kögel 2015). It has been reported that PM2.5-induced oxidative stress could trigger autophagy in various cell types (Deng et al. 2013, Su et al. 2017; Zhou et al. 2017). Consistent with these findings, we observed stimulation of autophagy in PM2.5-treated HaCaT keratinocytes in vitro and mouse keratinocytes in vivo.

In conclusion, our study shows that PM2.5 causes skin damage through induction of oxidative stress, which results in the destruction of complex macromolecules and cellular organelles, including the ER, mitochondria, and lysosomes, and promotes apoptotic cell death (Fig. 7). Thus, our results contribute to understanding of the mechanisms underlying PM2.5-induced adverse effects on the skin.

Fig. 7

PM2.5 causes skin injury by increasing apoptosis through oxidative stress and destruction of cellular organelles. PM2.5-induced ROS generation promotes ER stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and autophagy, leading to apoptotic cell death and skin damage

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant from the Basic Research Laboratory Program (NRF-2017R1A4A1014512) by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Air Korea site of Korea Environment Corporation (2015) Atmospheric Environment Statistical Yearbook, Chap 2.2, Korea. http://www.airkorea.or.kr/detailViewDown. Accessed 30 Oct 2017
  2. Air Korea site of Korea Environment Corporation (2016) Atmospheric Environment Statistical Yearbook, Chap 2.2, Korea. http://www.airkorea.or.kr/detailViewDown. Accessed 30 Oct 2017
  3. Air Korea site of Korea Environment Corporation (2017) Atmospheric Environment Statistical Yearbook, Chap 3.1, Korea. http://www.airkorea.or.kr/detailViewDown. Accessed 30 Oct 2017
  4. Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Hendershot LM, Harding HP, Ron D (2000) Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol 2:326–332.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35014014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao SS, Kaufman RJ (2014) Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in cell fate decision and human disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 21:396–413.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2014.5851 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhary AK, Yadav N, Bhat TA, O’Malley J, Kumar S, Chandra D (2016) A potential role of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein in mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and its implication in cancer therapy. Drug Discov Today 21:38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.07.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi H, Shin DW, Kim W, Doh SJ, Lee SH, Noh M (2011) Asian dust storm particles induce a broad toxicological transcriptional program in human epidermal keratinocytes. Toxicol Lett 200:92–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.10.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa C, Catania S, De Pasquale R, Stancanelli R, Scribano GM, Melchini A (2010) Exposure of human skin to benzo[a]pyrene: role of CYP1A1 and aryl hydrocarbon receptor in oxidative stress generation. Toxicology 271:83–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2010.02.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng X, Zhang F, Rui W, Long F, Wang L, Feng Z, Chen D, Ding W (2013) PM2.5-induced oxidative stress triggers autophagy in human lung epithelial A549 cells. Toxicol In Vitro 27:1762–1770.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2013.05.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Du Y, Xu X, Chu M, Guo Y, Wang J (2016) Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: the epidemiological, biomedical and clinical evidence. J Thorac Dis 8:E8-E19.  https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.37 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Farah MA, Ali MA, Chen SM, Li Y, Al-Hemaid FM, Abou-Tarboush FM, Al-Anazi KM, Lee J (2016) Silver nanoparticles synthesized from Adenium obesum leaf extract induced DNA damage, apoptosis and autophagy via generation of reactive oxygen species. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 141:158–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fazeli G, Wehman AM (2017) Safely removing cell debris with LC3-associated phagocytosis. Biol Cell 109:355–363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/boc.201700028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fritsche E, Schäfer C, Calles C, Bernsmann T, Bernshausen T, Wurm M, Hübenthal U, Cline JE, Hajimiragha H, Schroeder P, Klotz LO, Rannug A, Fürst P, Hanenberg H, Abel J, Krutmann J (2007) Lightening up the UV response by identification of the arylhydrocarbon receptor as a cytoplasmatic target for ultraviolet B radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8851–8856.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701764104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulda S, Kögel D (2015) Cell death by autophagy: emerging molecular mechanisms and implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene 34:5105–5113.  https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.458 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gualtieri M, Longhin E, Mattioli M, Mantecca P, Tinaglia V, Mangano E, Proverbio MC, Bestetti G, Camatini M, Battaglia C (2012) Gene expression profiling of A549 cells exposed to Milan PM2.5. Toxicol Lett 209:136–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo Z, Hong Z, Dong W, Deng C, Zhao R, Xu J, Zhuang G, Zhang R (2017) PM2.5-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in the nasal mucosa of rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:E134.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020134 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Han X, Liang WL, Zhang Y, Sun LD, Liang WY (2016) Effect of atmospheric fine particles on epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression in mouse skin tissue. Genet Mol Res.  https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15017188 Google Scholar
  18. Hotamisligil GS (2010) Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell 140:900–917.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu R, Xie XY, Xu SK, Wang YN, Jiang M, Wen LR, Lai W, Guan L (2017) PM2.5 exposure elicits oxidative stress responses and mitochondrial apoptosis pathway activation in HaCaT keratinocytes. Chin Med J 130:2205–2214.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.212942 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Jakobsen CH, Størvold GL, Bremseth H, Follestad T, Sand K, Mack M, Olsen KS, Lundemo AG, Iversen JG, Krokan HE, Schønberg SA (2008) DHA induces ER stress and growth arrest in human colon cancer cells: associations with cholesterol and calcium homeostasis. J Lipid Res 49:2089–2100.  https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M700389-JLR200 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeong JW, Cha HJ, Han MH, Hwang SJ, Lee DS, Yoo JS, Choi IW, Kim S, Kim HS, Kim GY, Hong SH, Park C, Lee HJ, Choi YH (2017) Spermidine protects against oxidative stress in inflammation models using macrophages and zebrafish. Biomol Ther.  https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2016.272 Google Scholar
  22. Jung S, Lim J, Kwon S, Jeon S, Kim J, Lee J, Kim S (2017) Characterization of particulate matter from diesel passenger cars tested on chassis dynamometers. J Environ Sci 54:21–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.01.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jux B, Kadow S, Luecke S, Rannug A, Krutmann J, Esser C (2011) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates UVB radiation-induced skin tanning. J Investig Dermatol 131:203–210.  https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2010.269 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaneto H, Matsuoka TA, Nakatani Y, Kawamori D, Miyatsuka T, Matsuhisa M, Yamasaki Y (2005) Oxidative stress, ER stress, and the JNK pathway in type 2 diabetes. J Mol Med 83:429–439.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-005-0640-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim HB, Yoo BS (2016) Propolis inhibits UVA-induced apoptosis of human keratinocyte HaCaT cells by scavenging ROS. Toxicol Res 32:345–351.  https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2016.32.4.345 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim KE, Cho D, Park HJ (2016) Air pollution and skin diseases: adverse effects of airborne particulate matter on various skin diseases. Life Sci 152:126–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.03.039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kouassi KS, Billet S, Garçon G, Verdin A, Diouf A, Cazier F, Djaman J, Courcot D, Shirali P (2010) Oxidative damage induced in A549 cells by physically and chemically characterized air particulate matter (PM2.5) collected in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. J Appl Toxicol 30:310–320.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1496 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Krutmann J, Liu W, Li L, Pan X, Crawford M, Sore G, Seite S (2014) Pollution and skin: from epidemiological and mechanistic studies to clinical implications. J Dermatol Sci 76:163–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.08.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Laing S, Wang G, Briazova T, Zhang C, Wang A, Zheng Z, Gow A, Chen AF, Rajagopalan S, Chen LC, Sun Q, Zhang K (2010) Airborne particulate matter selectively activates endoplasmic reticulum stress response in the lung and liver tissues. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 299:C736–C749.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00529.2009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee BK, Smith TJ, Garshick E, Natkin J, Reaser P, Lane K, Lee HK (2005) Exposure of trucking company workers to particulate matter during the winter. Chemosphere 61:1677–1690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.091 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee J, Giordano S, Zhang J (2012) Autophagy, mitochondria and oxidative stress: cross-talk and redox signalling. Biochem J 441:523–540.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20111451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee CW, Lin ZC, Hu SC, Chiang YC, Hsu LF, Lin YC, Lee IT, Tsai MH, Fang JY (2016) Urban particulate matter down-regulates filaggrin via COX2 expression/PGE2 production leading to skin barrier dysfunction. Sci Rep 6:27995.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27995 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee YK, Kim SW, Park JY, Kang WC, Kang YJ, Khang D (2017) Suppression of human arthritis synovial fibroblasts inflammation using dexamethasone-carbon nanotubes via increasing caveolin-dependent endocytosis and recovering mitochondrial membrane potential. Int J Nanomed 12:5761–5779.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S142122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li D, Li L, Li P, Li Y, Chen X (2015) Apoptosis of HeLa cells induced by a new targeting photosensitizer-based PDT via a mitochondrial pathway and ER stress. Onco Targets Ther 8:703–711.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S76370 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Q, Kang Z, Jiang S, Zhao J, Yan S, Xu F, Xu J (2017) Effects of ambient fine particles PM2.5 on human HaCaT cells. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:E72.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu Q, Xu C, Ji GX, Liu H, Shao WT, Zhang CL, Gu A, Zhao P (2017) Effect of exposure to ambient PM2.5 pollution on the risk of respiratory tract diseases: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Biomed Res 31:130–142.  https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.31.20160071 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Ly LD, Xu S, Choi SK, Ha CM, Thoudam T, Cha SK, Wiederkehr A, Wollheim CB, Lee IK, Park KS (2017) Oxidative stress and calcium dysregulation by palmitate in type 2 diabetes. Exp Mol Med 49:e291.  https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2016.157 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Mei Y, Thompson MD, Cohen RA, Tong X (2013) Endoplasmic reticulum stress and related pathological processes. J Pharmacol Biomed Anal 1:1000107PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Morita M, Naito Y, Yoshikawa T, Niki E (2016) Plasma lipid oxidation induced by peroxynitrite, hypochlorite, lipoxygenase and peroxyl radicals and its inhibition by antioxidants as assessed by diphenyl-1-pyrenylphosphine. Redox Biol 8:127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2016.01.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Nishitoh H (2012) CHOP is a multifunctional transcription factor in the ER stress response. J Biochem 151:217–219.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvr143 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Park JE, Piao MJ, Kang KA, Shilnikova K, Hyun YJ, Oh SK, Jeong YJ, Chae S, Hyun JW (2017) A Benzylideneacetophenone derivative induces apoptosis of radiation-resistant human breast cancer cells via oxidative stress. Biomol Ther 25:404–410.  https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2017.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piao MJ, Kim KC, Choi JY, Choi J, Hyun JW (2011) Silver nanoparticles down-regulate Nrf2-mediated 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 through inactivation of extracellular regulated kinase and protein kinase B in human Chang liver cells. Toxicol Lett 207:143–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.09.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryter SW, Cloonan SM, Choi AM (2013) Autophagy: a critical regulator of cellular metabolism and homeostasis. Mol Cells 36:7–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-013-0140-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Schrock JM, Spino CM, Longen CG, Stabler SM, Marino JC, Pasternak GW, Kim FJ (2013) Sequential cytoprotective responses to sigma1 ligand-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Pharmacol 84:751–762.  https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.113.087809 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Soeur J, Belaïdi JP, Chollet C, Denat L, Dimitrov A, Jones C, Perez P, Zanini M, Zobiri O, Mezzache S, Erdmann D, Lereaux G, Eilstein J, Marrot L (2017) Photo-pollution stress in skin: traces of pollutants (PAH and particulate matter) impair redox homeostasis in keratinocytes exposed to UVA1. J Dermatol Sci 86:162–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.01.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Song S, Lee K, Lee YM, Lee JH, Lee SI, Yu SD, Paek D (2011) Acute health effects of urban fine and ultrafine particles on children with atopic dermatitis. Environ Res 111:394–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2010.10.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Su R, Jin X, Zhang W, Li Z, Liu X, Ren J (2017) Particulate matter exposure induces the autophagy of macrophages via oxidative stress-mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Chemosphere 167:444–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tanida I, Minematsu-Ikeguchi N, Ueno T, Kominami E (2005) Lysosomal turnover, but not a cellular level, of endogenous LC3 is a marker for autophagy. Autophagy 1:84–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Vogel CF, Chang WL, Kado S, McCulloh K, Vogel H, Wu D, Haarmann-Stemmann T, Yang G, Leung PS, Matsumura F, Gershwin ME (2016) Transgenic overexpression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AhRR) and AhR-mediated induction of CYP1A1, cytokines, and acute toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 124:1071–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510194 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang M, Wey S, Zhang Y, Ye R, Lee AS (2009) Role of the unfolded protein response regulator GRP78/BiP in development, cancer, and neurological disorders. Antioxid Redox Signal 11:2307–2316.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ARS.2009.2485 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang Z, Liu D, Varin A, Nicolas V, Courilleau D, Mateo P, Caubere C, Rouet P, Gomez AM, Vandecasteele G, Fischmeister R, Brenner C (2016) A cardiac mitochondrial cAMP signaling pathway regulates calcium accumulation, permeability transition and cell death. Cell Death Dis 7:e2198.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.106 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang Y, Xiong L, Tang M (2017) Toxicity of inhaled particulate matter on the central nervous system: neuroinflammation, neuropsychological effects and neurodegenerative disease. J Appl Toxicol 37:644–667.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wei H, Feng Y, Liang F, Cheng W, Wu X, Zhou R, Wang Y (2017) Role of oxidative stress and DNA hydroxymethylation in the neurotoxicity of fine particulate matter. Toxicology 380:94–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2017.01.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu C, Bailly-Maitre B, Reed JC (2005) Endoplasmic reticulum stress: cell life and death decisions. J Clin Investig 115:2656–2664.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI26373 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Yao J, Jiao R, Liu C, Zhang Y, Yu W, Lu Y, Tan R (2016) Assessment of the cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of chaetominine in a human leukemia cell line. Biomol Ther 24:147–155.  https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2015.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao J, Gao Z, Tian Z, Xie Y, Xin F, Jiang R, Kan H, Song W (2013) The biological effects of individual-level PM(2.5) exposure on systemic immunity and inflammatory response in traffic policemen. Occup Environ Med 70:426–431.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-100864 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou ZX, Shao T, Qin MN, Miao XY, Chang Y, Sheng W, Wu FS, Yu YJ (2017) The effects of autophagy on vascular endothelial cells induced by airborne PM2.5. J Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.05.019 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mei Jing Piao
    • 1
  • Mee Jung Ahn
    • 2
  • Kyoung Ah Kang
    • 1
  • Yea Seong Ryu
    • 1
  • Yu Jae Hyun
    • 1
  • Kristina Shilnikova
    • 1
  • Ao Xuan Zhen
    • 1
  • Jin Woo Jeong
    • 3
  • Yung Hyun Choi
    • 3
  • Hee Kyoung Kang
    • 1
  • Young Sang Koh
    • 1
  • Jin Won Hyun
    • 1
  1. 1.Jeju National University School of Medicine and Jeju Research Center for Natural MedicineJejuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Laboratory of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary MedicineJeju National UniversityJejuRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Biochemistry, College of Oriental MedicineDongeui UniversityBusanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations