Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of ochratoxin A by polyclonal antibodies based sensitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay

  • Toxicokinetics and Metabolism
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using indirect competitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TRFIA), a rapid, highly selective and extremely sensitive method has been established for the determination of ochratoxin A (OA). Tests can be performed in a 96-well microplate using the toxin-specific polyclonal antibodies, obtained from rabbits immunized with ochratoxin A-keyhole limpet’s hemocyanin (OA–KLH). In indirect TRFIA format, ochratoxin A-bovine serum albumin conjugate (OA–BSA) is coated onto the microtitre plate and incubated with standard toxin (samples) and anti-OA antibody. A goat anti-rabbit IgG Eu3+ conjugate is used to enable the detection. The suitability of the assay for quantification of OA is also studied and samples are determined by OA-TRFIA using autoDELFIA1235 system. The results show that the polyclonal antibodies can be used at a dilution exceeding 1:8,000 and the OA detection limit is 0.02 μg/l for indirect competitive TRFIA formats. The 80, 50, and 20% inhibition binding effect dose (ED80, ED50, ED20) of OA were 0.195, 1.018, and 5.314 μg/l, respectively. The assay ranges from 0.02 to 400 μg/l. The cross reactivity with ochratoxin B is 5.6% and antibodies do not react with aflatoxin B1, phenylalanine and BSA. The within-run and between-run CVs of the OA-TRFIA are 2.6 and 5.2%, respectively. The mean recoveries from the OA-free cereals spiked with 1–200 μg of OA/kg of cereals sample were 95.8%. Both OA-TRFIA and OA-ELISA tests are applied for the quantitative measurement of OA in the same cereals, and the coefficient of correlation is 0.912. The results show that the novel TRFIA method can be applied to detect the OA contamination in cereals. It provides very high sensitivity and optimal range and will be useful to screen OA contamination easily, simply, and economically when the number of samples is large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barna-Vetro I, Solti L, Teren J, Gyongyosi A, Szabo E, Wolfing A (1996) Sensitive ELISA test for the determination of ochratoxin A. J Agric Food Chem 44:4071–4074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter ED (2001) The fate of ochratoxin A during malting and brewing. J Am Soc Brew Chem 59:98–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gyongyosi-Horvath A, Barna-Vetro I, Solti L (1996) A new monoclonal antibody detecting ochratoxin A at the picogram level. Lett Appl Microbiol 22:103–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmila I, Dakubu S, Mukkala VM (1984) Europium as a label in time-resolved immunofluorometric assays. Anal Biochem 137:335–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hohler D (1998) Ochratoxin A in food and feed: occurrence, legislation and mode of action. Z Ernaehrungswiss 37:2–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Xiao HL, Zhu LG, Tan C, Cai GM, Jin J (2001) Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay of α-fetoprotein. Asian J Nucl Med 1:40–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs F, Vanyi A (1994) Molds-mycotoxins-food contamination-human health aspects. Food Ind 12:362 – 365

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson J, Borjesson T, Lundstedt T, Schnurer J (2002) Detection and quantification of ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol in barley grains by GC–MS and electronic nose. Int J Food Microbiol 72:203–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne BG (1979) Reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography determination of ochratoxin A in flour and bakery products. J Sci Food Agric 30:1065–1070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott PM, Kanhere SR (1995) Determination of ochratoxin A in beer. Food Addit Contam 12:591–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott PM, Kanhere SR, Lawrence GA, Daley EF, Farber JM (1995) Fermentation of wort containing added ochratoxin A and fumonisins B1 and B2. Food Addit Contam 12:31–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thirumala Devi K, Mayo MA, Delfosse P, Reddy G, Reddy SV, Reddy DVR (2000) Production of polyclonal antibodies for ochratoxin A and its detection in chilies by ELISA. J Agric Food Chem 48:5079–5082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visconti A, Pascale M, Centonze G (2000) Determination of ochratoxin A in domestic and imported beers in Italy by immunoaffinity clean-up and liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 888:321–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ML, Wang JM, Wang HZ (1998) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of ochratoxin corn. J Shandong Agric Univ 29:384–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Weddeling K, Bassler HMS, Doerk H, Baron G (1994) Orientational experiments on the applicability of enzymic immunological methods for the detection of deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin A and zearalenone in brewing barley, malt and beer. Monatsschr Brauwiss 47:94–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Ministry of Science and Technology of China financially supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, B., Tao, W., Shi, J. et al. Determination of ochratoxin A by polyclonal antibodies based sensitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay. Arch Toxicol 80, 481–485 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-006-0112-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-006-0112-2

Keywords

Navigation