Experimental elucidation of an antimycobacterial bacteriocin produced by ethnomedicinal plant-derived Bacillus subtilis (MK733983)


A bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis (MK733983) originated from ethnomedicinal plant was purified using Preparative RP-HPLC. The HPLC fraction eluted with 65% acetonitrile showed the highest antimicrobial activity with Mycobacterium smegmatis as an indicator. Its specific activity and purification fold increased by 70.5% and 44%, respectively, compared to the crude bacteriocin. The bacteriocin showed stability over a wide range of pH (3.0–8.0) and preservation (− 20 °C and 4 °C), also thermal stability up to 80 °C for 20 min. Its proteinaceous nature was confirmed with complete loss of activity on its treatment with Trypsin, Proteinase K, and α-Chymotrypsin. Nevertheless, the bacteriocin retained up to 45% activity with Papainase treatment and was unaffected by salivary Amylase. It maintained ~ 95% activity on UV exposure up to 3 h and its activity was augmented by ethyl alcohol and metal ions like Fe2+ and Mn2+. Most of the common organic solvents, general surfactants, preservatives, and detergents like Sulfobetaine-14, Deoxy-cholic-acid did not affect the bacteriocin’s action. Its molecular weight was estimated to be 3.4KDa by LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. The bacteriocin is non-hemolytic and exhibited a broad inhibition spectrum with standard strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Chromobacterium violaceum with MICs ranging 0.225 ± 0.02–0.55 ± 0.05 mg/mL. Scanning Electron Microscopy showed cell annihilation with pores in cell membranes of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa treated with the bacteriocin, implicating bactericidal mode of action. These promising results suggest that the bacteriocin is significant and has wide-ranging application prospects.


Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the ecological adaptations among microbes with their competitors either for resources or existence. Over the past decades, a widespread use of antibiotics has drastically increased the number of antibiotic-resistant microbes. These resistant microbes assimilate multifarious mechanisms to survive various impacts of antibiotics. This is a dangerously evolving situation and a grave health hazard threatening various existing medical practices, global health, and economy. On the other hand, scarcity of novel antimicrobials in recent years is aggravating the situation (WHO 2020; Wolcott and Ehrlich 2008). Some of the common pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and coagulase-negative staphylococci cause up to 65% cases of bacteremia. These pathogenic ailments are not only amounting to 98.2% of overall systemic infections but are developing resistance to numerous antibiotics at a frightening pace (Sohail et al. 2015). Older infections such as Tuberculosis (TB) yet remain to be the worst communicable diseases in humans with high death rates. WHO estimated nearly 1.7 million TB deaths and 10.4 million newly infected cases in 2016. Of these occurrences, new rifampicin-resistant cases were 600,000 and 490,000 confirmed multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) (Sivaraj et al. 2018). Even with the escalating complexities of TB and other infections, efficacious drugs have not been discovered for the past 40 years except for a novel TB drug, bedaquiline approved in 2012. Considering the whole ordeal, WHO (2017) advocates judicious antibiotic use and instigated an action plan on AMR to guide novel discoveries and development of new antibiotics. The WHO has disclosed a Priority Pathogens List (PPL) that emphasize on pathogens needing critical innovations and advancement of treatments and vaccines.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are also known as host defense peptides (HDPs) and they are emerging as potential therapeutic alternatives to antibiotics. They are relatively small, heterogenous, amphipathic or predominantly cationic peptides with an ability to inhibit or eradicate planktonic microbes. They have distinctive attributes and diverse kill mechanisms with precise selective toxicity against bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites. Each AMP is unique with its specific discriminatory characteristics and multidimensional properties like flexibility, synergistic potency with various antibiotics and conventional drugs, neutralization of endotoxins with low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), inhibition or eradication of established biofilms, significant anti-viral and anti-cancerous properties, broad-spectrum inhibition of multi drug resistant (MDR) microbes, immunomodulation and others. Such valuable properties are awarding attention to AMPs as exploration hot spots. Many studies have validated its applications in Medicine, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Aquaculture and Bio-preservation among others (Naafs et al. 2018; Gutsmann 2016).

Several AMPs have been isolated from Bacillus species like coagulin, tochicin, subtilin, and megasin (Park et al. 2002). Bacillus subtilis strains are well-known to produce many bacteriocins with varied functions depending on their ecological spaces, allocation of resources and entrants, yet bacteriocins from these strains are less explored (Ramya et al. 2014). The objective of this study was to purify and characterize a potential bacteriocin from an ethnomedicinal plant originated strain of B. subtilis (MK733983). Furthermore, its inhibition spectrum, hemolytic activity and mechanism of action were also delineated.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and materials

All the chemicals were purchased from SD Fine-Chem Ltd (India), HIMEDIA and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Polyethersulfone membrane syringe filter–pore size 0.22 µm (Merck), SEP–PACK C18 cartridge (Flinn Scientific) and goat blood was procured from the local butcher shop.

Indicator microorganisms (IMOs)

Mycobacterium smegmatis (MC2-155 wild type) (ATCC 607)–MS, Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 737)–SA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 3541)–PA, Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700,721)–KP, Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739)–EC and Chromobacterium violaceum (MTCC 2656)–CV.


Trypsin (T-8918; Sigma), Proteinase K (P-2308; Sigma), Papain (GRM058-HIMEDIA), α-Chymotrypsin (RM801-HIMEDIA) and Salivary amylase (Human Saliva in 1: 9 of 0.85% saline solution).

Bacteriocin activity assay

Antimicrobial potential of the bacteriocin was evaluated using Spot-on-lawn or well diffusion assays, these assays were performed twice in triplicates with indicator organisms (SA, MS, PA, KP, EC & CV) (Balouiri et al. 2016; Tagg and McGiven 1971). 30 µL of the purified bacteriocin was dissolved in DMSO were loaded into each 6 mm wide wells made in suitable agar plates, pre-swabbed with 100 µL indicator inoculum, then these plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. C. violaceum was sensitive to 1% DMSO, therefore, 0.5% DMSO was used as blank or negative control and 1% DMSO was taken as a blank or negative control for all other IMOs in this study. Anti-bacterial activity was determined based on its potential inhibitory zone (mm) against indicator organisms (Cita et al. 2017). Activity was calculated as ab × 100, where ‘a’ is the dilution factor and ‘b’ is the final dilution factor that produced a minimum inhibition zone of 2 mm.

Purification and analysis

The proteins were estimated according to Lowry et al. (1951) and the bacteriocin’s specific activity was evaluated following Lee and Chang (2018) protocol. The Bacteriocin, an antimicrobial peptide was purified to its homogeneity using Preparative RP-HPLC as described by Anand et al. (2005) and Lee and Chang (2018) with minor modifications. Further, the sample was dissolved in methanol (1%v/v) and passed through C18 SEP-PACK for better extraction and fractionation of the desired low molecular weight antimicrobial peptides. The dried concentrates were dissolved in 50% acetonitrile (1 mg/mL) and ultra-filtrated with 0.22 µm membrane filter. Followed by a separating technique using recycling preparative LC-120AD (228–45,000-4B) HPLC system with reverse-phase C-18 (VYDAC) column (10 × 250 mm) connected to Shimadzu SPD-6AV UV–VIS detectors (200 & 254) nm. The first injection on RP-HPLC used a water-acetonitrile gradient (50–50%) at a flow rate of 1 ml per min and eluents were collected every 10 min for 50 min. These fractions were concentrated and resuspended in 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7) and were tested for antibacterial activity. The fraction that showed the highest antimicrobial activity was re-run with two different elution gradients of water-acetonitrile (60–40%) and (40–65%). The flow rate was maintained at 1 ml per min, that was collected every 20 min for an hour and were tested as mentioned above. The fraction that showed the best antimicrobial activity was further analyzed by LC-ESI-MS/MS (Malini and Savitha 2012).

Invitro Bio-physiochemical characterization

Effect of temperature, pH, hydrolytic enzymes, and UV rays

The effect of heat on the bacteriocin (AMP) was evaluated by its incubation under moist heat treatment from 40–121 °C by 10 °C rise for 20 min. Its preservation capacity was tested for 120 days (30 day interval) at (− 20 °C and 4 °C) and at room temp (25–28 °C) for 5 days (24 h interval).

The pH of the bacteriocin was adjusted to 3–10 (interval of 1) using sterile 5 mol/mL NaOH or HCl and were maintained at corresponding pH for 20 min (Ge et al. 2016), it was then resuspended in 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7) and tested for antibacterial activity.

The effect of hydrolytic enzymes was evaluated by taking each in 1:5 ratio of bacteriocin to Trypsin (pH 8.0), Proteinase K (pH 7.5), α-Chymotrypsin (pH 7.8), Papainase (pH 7.0) and Salivary amylase (pH 7.0) were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.

The effect of UV rays on the bacteriocin for up to 6 h (60 min interval) was also evaluated. Further, the samples that were unexposed to heat, enzymes, pH and UV were taken as positive control and LB broth was taken as a negative control or Blank. Residual bacteriocin activity of all the samples was tested and evaluated for antimicrobial activity based on the ratio of inhibitory activity of treated to untreated. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by the well diffusion assays (IMO- M. smegmatis) and these were conducted in triplicates and their average values with the standard deviations were reported.

Effect of organic solvents, salt, surfactants, preservatives, and metal ions

30 µL of the bacteriocin (1 mg/mL) was incubated for an hour with each 10% w/v of methanol, ethanol, butanol, acetone, benzene, propanol, DMSO, xylol and chloroform at 25 °C to examine their effect. The response of different concentrations of sodium chloride (2–12%) on the bacteriocin was evaluated (Zhang et al. 2018). Effect of surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulphate (1 mg/mL), triton X-100 (1%v/v), tween 20, 80 (10%v/v), sodium deoxycholate (1 mg/mL) and sulfobetaine 14 (1 mg/mL) on the antimicrobial peptide was analyzed as described by Bizani and Brandelli (2002). It was also examined to validate its outcome with certain common protein denaturing agents scuh as trichloroacetic acid (TCA 10%v/v), sodium bicarbonate (12%w/v), sodium sulphate (12%w/v), ß mercaptoethanol (10%v/v), urea (1 mg/mL), preservatives like EDTA (10 mmol/L), sodium citrate (1 mg/mL), catalysts such as sodium tungstate (1 mg/mL) and metal ions like KCl, CaCl2, FeSO4, ZnSO4, CuCl2, MgSO4 and MnSO4 (2.0 mmol/L). Residual bacteriocin activity was measured as described earlier, all experiments were conducted in triplicates and average values with standard deviations were calculated.


Hemolytic assay

Hemolytic activity on the bacteriocin was investigated according to the methods described by Wu et al. (2020), Afsar et al. (2016) and Soto (2014) with minimal variations. Fresh pellet of erythrocytes from Goat blood was adjusted to a concentration of 5% in saline solution. 100 μL of saline solution was added to all the wells (1–12) of a microplate and the well 11 is taken as a negative control. 100 μL of the bacteriocin (100 µg, 250 µg, 500 µg and1 mg/ml) was added to each of the first wells followed by twofold dilutions performed till 10th well, well 12 containing 100 μL of 1% Triton-X 100 as a positive control. Then 100 μL of 5% blood was added to the wells except well 11. Plate was incubated at 37 ºC for an hour and 70µL of supernatants from each well were collected into a new microplate to avoid any sediment from hemolysis. The samples were measured absorbance at 490 nm using ELISA reader (Lisa Plus Plate Reader, Rapid Diagnostics, India). The assay was carried out twice in duplicates, and the percentage of hemolysis was calculated as follows,

$${\text{Haemolysis \% }} = \frac{{{\text{OD of Bacterioicn}} - {\text{OD of }}\left( { - {\text{ve}}} \right){\text{ Control}}}}{{{\text{OD of }}\left( { + {\text{ve}}} \right){\text{ Control}}}} - {\text{ OD of }}\left( { - {\text{ve}}} \right){\text{Control}} \times 100$$

Inhibition spectrum and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs)

The IMO’s were taken in an inoculum size of 106 CFU/mL, measured at A600 for antimicrobial assays in their suitable growth conditions. M. smegmatis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. violaceum were grown in LB (Luria–Bertani) media, and K. pneumoniae, E. coli on MH (Muller-Hinton) Media at 35 °C for 24 h. 20 μL (~ 2 mg) and 40 μL (~ 4 mg) of the purified AMP was placed in the wells of media overlaid with 100 μL of gram positive and negative IMO’s, respectively. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the antimicrobial activity was evaluated along with MIC values as described by Santhi and Aranganathan (2019).

Mode of action (MOA)

Morphological Changes on treatment with bacteriocin were evaluated according to the methods described by Wu et al. (2020) and Park et al. (2002) with slight variations. S. aureus, a gram-positive and P. aeruginosa, gram-negative IMO were grown in standard LB broth, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The indicator cells (probably in stationary phase) were suspended in saline and treated with the same volume of the bacteriocin (1 mg/mL), the untreated cells were taken as control. After incubation (3–6 h at 37 °C), cells were thoroughly washed with phosphate buffer (pH7.4), resuspended in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and were dehydrated via gradual ethanol gradient (10–100%). Dehydrated samples were freeze-dried, gold coated and observed using a Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) with dual-beam focused ion-beam (FIB), EDS and monochrometer (MonoCL) (Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru).

Statistical analysis

All experimental results were expressed as means ± standard error of the standard deviation (SD), the significant differences were examined using Microsoft Excel [Microsoft 365 MSO (16.0.12827.20200) 32-bit]. Relative Percentages and residual activity were calculated in comparison to the Positive control values of the experiments performed.


Purification and analysis

Among all fractions from preparative RP-HPLC of C18 SEP-PAK purified sample eluted with 50% Acetonitrile, fraction 1.4 collected at 30–40 min shows the highest zone of inhibition (Fig. 1). On the re-run, fraction 1.4 with 40% acetonitrile noted as sub fractions 1.4.1 to 1.4.3, the fraction that was collected between 20–40 min, 1.4.2 alone showed antimicrobial activity (Fig. 2). However, the same fraction (1.4) when re-run with 65% acetonitrile noted as sub fractions 1.4.1a to 1.4.3a, the fraction that was collected between 20-40 min, 1.4.2a showed highest antimicrobial activity (Fig. 3). This active compound was estimated to have 3402.87 m/z ions at an intensity between (1.8e + 3)–(1.9e + 3) by LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis (Fig. 4). In LC-ESI tandem mass spectroscopy, as the molecules are ionized by electron impact (ESI), the peak with greatest m/z value gives its relative mass. All other smaller peaks present around the highest peak are the molecular ions of its isotopes, therefore, its molecular weight was estimated to be 3.40287KDa (or 3.4KDa). Antimicrobial activity of the purified bacteriocin increased by 87%, specific activity by 70.5% with an increase in purification fold by 44% compared to the crude bacteriocin in cell-free supernatant (CFS) as shown Table 1.

Fig. 1

Chromatogram of preparative RP-HPLC of C18 SEP-PAK purified sample shows highest zone of inhibition

Fig. 2

Chromatogram of preparative-HPLC of fraction 1.4.2 eluted with 40% acetonitrile shows zone of inhibition

Fig. 3

Chromatogram of preparative-HPLC of fraction 1.42a eluted with 65% acetonitrile shows highest zone of inhibition

Fig. 4

Molecular mass analysis of the purified bacteriocin by liquid chromatography electron spay ionization tandem mass spectroscopy

Table 1 Purification summary of bacteriocin produced by Bacillus subtilis (MK733983)

Invitro biophysiochemical characterization

Characterization based on temperature, pH, hydrolytic enzymes, and UV rays

The AMP showed above 90% of antimicrobial activity at pH levels ranging 3.0–9.0 and temperatures up to 80 ºC but had lost activity at 121 ºC. The bacteriocin was resistant to treatment with Papainase and was unaffected by salivary Amylase, also exposure to UV rays did not affect its activity up to 3 h, as recorded in Table 2. Preservation of the bacteriocin at -20 ºC and 4 ºC for 5 months did not affect its antimicrobial activity, with their inhibition zones ranging from 28 ± 0.12 to 27.4 ± 0.3, showing 97% activity. Even though the storage at room temperatures was not effective after 24 h, a steady maintenance of the bacteriocin activity for 5 months at refrigeration (4 ºC) temperatures is extremely valuable and economical as it does not require an ultra-cold storage facility which is both expensive and difficult to handle.

Table 2 Physical Characterization

Effect of chemical agents and metal ions

The bacteriocin showed an advantageous response to the treatment with ethyl alcohol with a sharp rise in antimicrobial potency, but its activity decreased with an increase in NaCl concentration. It showed substantial tolerance to preservatives such as EDTA, organic solvents and most of the surfactants used in this study, except for a few like SDS and Tween 80. Metal ions like Fe2+, Mn2+ showed enhancement of the bacteriocin activity and it had completely lost its activity with all common protein denaturing agents that were used in this study (Table 3).

Table 3 Effect of organic solvents, surfactants, preservatives, and metal ions

Hemolytic assay

The results of the hemolytic assay proved that the bacteriocin treatment did not affect 99.79–99.81% (100–1000 µg/mL) of erythrocytes, as clearly shown in Table 4, signifying its non-hemolytic character.

Table 4 Hemolytic assay

Inhibition spectrum and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)

The RP-HPLC purified bacteriocin (PB) demonstrated improved growth inhibition against Gram positive and negative bacteria as shown in Table 5. Highest increase in the bacteriocin activity was observed in S. aureus (Gram positive) and P. aeruginosa (Gram negative) with 60% and 39.9%, respectively, compared to the potency of C18 SEP-PACK partially purified bacteriocin (PPB).

Table 5 Inhibition Spectrum and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Mechanism of action

Several topographical variations were spotted through FESEM analysis in the indicator cells treated with bacteriocin. Some of the prominent observations made in the bacteriocin treated S. aureus cells (SA) are irregular cell surfaces (a), flatter cells (b), accumulation of cell debris (c), and prominent pore formation (d). On the other hand, P. aeruginosa (PA) treated cells also showed noticeably shortened cells (a), swollen cells (b), and cells displaying pore formation (c), as compared to the topography of untreated cells (Fig. 5). The bacteriocin treated cells visibly seemed to be damaged, disfigured, and lysed. The pores seen in cells of both gram positive and negative bacteria suggest a bactericidal impact and the cell death might have occurred due to cell constituent’s leakage.

Fig. 5

FESEM images of Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 737) cells treated with purified bacteriocin. Ps1-Untreated cells (control); Qs1-Bacteriocin treated cells: a-irregular cell surfaces; b-flattened cells; c-cell debris; d-Visual pores. Rs1-Magnified image of an untreated cell and Ss1-Magnified image of the treated cell. FESEM images of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 3541) cells treated with purified bacteriocin. Pp2-Untreated cells (control); Qp2-Bacteriocin treated cells, a shortened cells; b swollen cells; c visual Pores in cell. Rp2-Magnified image of an untreated cell and Sp2-Magnified image of treated cell


A potential bacteriocin isolated as a transient endophyte from Bacillus subtilis (MK733983) was elucidated and its characteristics were evaluated in this study. Preparative-RP-HPLC was used for the benefit of effective purification, quantification, and categorical characterization of the bacteriocin (Aurea et al. 2011, 2014). Studies have shown that the antibacterial activity depends on hydrophobic interaction between microbes and AMPs. In agreement with the same, it was rational that the elution with 65% acetonitrile can fractionate hydrophobic moieties more efficiently than with 40% of acetonitrile. This could be one plausible reason for the higher antimicrobial activity of RP-HPLC fraction eluted with 65% acetonitrile (Gao et al. 1991).

The proteinaceous nature of this bacteriocin was confirmed as it entirely lost activity with proteolytic enzymes, validating its position as GRAS (generally accepted as safe) peptide. Partial impediment in antimicrobial activity by Papainase indicated that the antimicrobial peptide may have had Papain-resistant components. It showed notable features like tolerance to organic solvents, anionic detergents (sulfobetaine 14), zwitterionic detergents (sodium deoxycholate), synergistic action with ethyl alcohol and metal ions (Fe2+, Mn2+). Additionally, thermostability and a wide-ranging pH tolerance expand its possibilities as a bio-preservative and for other industrial applications (Hammami et al. 2009). Several AMPs have recorded hemolysis as a critical limitation and so, they were employed for topical therapies to avoid systemic adverse effects (Pfalzgraff et al. 2018). The bacteriocin presented in this study has shown non-hemolytic nature, enhancing its curative options. The bacteriocin showed excellent tolerance (> 95%) to specified biological detergents such as Sulfobetaine-14 and Sodium deoxycholate. Sulfobetaine-14 is widely used in hair conditioners, contact lens solutions and in the purification of proteins. On the other hand, Sodium deoxycholate is often used as a biological detergent and for cytolytic medications. Commercial value of the biological surfactants with added anti-infective agents (like the mentioned bacteriocin) can both be profitable and of therapeutic gain.

Antimicrobial peptides typically tend to inhibit taxonomically related strains but the bacteriocin emphasized in this study displayed broad inhibition spectrum. It was uniquely similar to Subtilein (Park et al. 2002), Thuricin 17 (Gray et al. 2006), Cerein 8A (Bizani et al. 2005), Gas 101 (Sharma et al. 2018) through its antagonistic activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Besides, it also showed effective inhibition of M. smegmatis, K. pneumoniae and C. violaceum. The bacteriocin showed maximum antibacterial effect towards critically prioritized standard microbes and analogues suuuccch as S. aureus, M. smegmatis, P. aeruginosa followed by others. The rationale for higher bacteriocin dosage to inhibit gram-negative strains might account on their taxonomical differences.

Nearly all studies performed on C. violaceum are mostly committed to its quorum sensing ability and other biotechnological purposes. However, its first clinical risk reported by Bottieau et al. (2014) capable of eliciting serious bacteremia was alarming. This infection was reported to be intimidating as it spreads through the skin or respiratory system with fatality rate exceeding 50%. Currently, it is reported as an emerging pathogen (Batista and Neto 2017) and the bacteriocin’s ability to inhibit C. violaceum must be further explored. Likewise, the bacteriocin might be antagonistic to various other microbes with analogous quorum sensing strategies resembling C. violaceum and it requires further research. Most pathogens come up with compelling quorum sensing mechanisms, significant for biofilm development as reported in ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.). Inhibition of some standard strains belonging to ESKAPE list reiterates the bacteriocin’s prominence and its forthcoming propensity for biofilm inhibition.

M. tuberculosis causes Tuberculosis (TB) and the soaring global TB drug resistance is frightening. TB is the leading cause of death in most immunocompromised individuals. Potential drugs and novel vaccines will be required to achieve the targets set in ‘The End TB Strategy’ by WHO (Tiberi et al. 2018). AMPs as potential antimycobacterial agents or drug candidates are relatively less explored (Sivaraj et al. 2018; Aguilar-Perez et al. 2018 and Sosunov et al. 2007). Invention and Development of novel antitubercular drugs and vaccines have become extremely challenging and causes for its shortage are numerous. One of the reasons for this paucity is also due to the impenetrable, composite cell walls of Mycobacterium species. It consists of a hydrophobic mycolate layer bound to peptidoglycan layer with polysaccharides and arabinogalactans. Thus, the selected drug agents must target its cell wall components with diverse strategies. The bacteriocin staged in this research showed bactericidal effect on M. smegmatis, a widely credited surrogate for M. tuberculosis (Agrawal et al. 2015; Li et al. 2004). Further the in-vivo investigations of this bacteriocin on M. tuberculosis and its resistant strains will be essential to explicate its efficacy. Further, the bactericidal action with prominent pore formation was seen in both gram positive and negative bacteria accord with toroidal pore model described by Le et al. (2017). The model illustrates that the bacteriocin interaction with cell membranes disturb its electrochemical potential. It forces the cell membrane to aggregate peptide monomers and lipid moieties to fold inward to form pores. Further, permeation of proteins and other larger molecules through these pores, destroy cell morphology and cell membranes ultimately resulting in cell death.

Many studies report antiviral drug resistance for respiratory, sexually transmitted, and enteric viruses and there is a pressing need for effective antiviral agents. Lange-Starke et al. (2014) registered an antiviral peptide (AVP) effective on murine norovirus S99 (MNV), influenza A virus A/WSN/ 33 (H1N1), Newcastle disease virus Montana (NDV) and feline herpesvirus KS 285 (FHV). Wang et al. (2017) documented effective inhibition of transmissible gastroenteritis virus by surfactin. Silva et al. (2014) stated an AMP from B. subtilis, P34 for inhibiting canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2), canine coronavirus (CCoV), canine distemper virus (CDV), canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2) and equine arteritis virus (EAV). Starosila et al. (2017) and Peng et al. (2019) reported AVPs for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Kassaa et al. (2014) described the effect of LAB probiotics against viral infections. Search for AVPs from Bacillus genus is an emerging frontier and future assessment of the antiviral, antifungal, antiparasitic and antitumor potential of the presented bacteriocin is essential.

As per our knowledge, the present study is presenting a unique and potential Ethno-Phyto-microbiome originated bacteriocin. It has effective antimycobacterial activity and is antibacterial towards certain vital bacterial standard strains. It is non-hemolytic with many beneficial biophysiochemical features and an effective mechanism of action.


AMR is an evolved health hazard with impoverished drug remedies in the modern world. Experts globally warn that we are on the brink of a disaster with increasing emergence of novel infections and resistant microbes down with a dearth of effective drugs and vaccines. The ongoing pandemic by SARS-Cov-2 virus (2020) is a wake-up call to brisk the discovery and development of potential drugs and vaccines. This deadly viral infection has brought the entire human population to a halt waiting for novel antimicrobial agents. Adding to this, healthcare professionals globally also predict that the estimated economic burden of resistance due to E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, Tuberculosis, HIV, and malaria together will soon reach a worst-case scenario. We urgently require immediate effective measures and novel antimicrobial agents with diverse strategies. Though many approaches are being developed to treat microbial infections, antimicrobial peptides are promising alternatives. AMPs are drawing attention as potential drug candidates, as they can kill the resistant microbes with precise selective toxicity and without developing resistance. Many AMPs show negligible host cytotoxicity, can inhibit evolved biofilms targeting their stress response and can synergize with several antibiotics. The bacteriocin presented in this investigation has justified its broad inhibition spectrum against critical strains of Gram positive, Gram negative and TB pathogen analogue. Further in vivo studies will contribute to its development as a precursor for the development of promising additional anti-mycobacterial/anti-bacterial drugs and other application prospects.

Data availability

All the data, text and results presented in this publication are authors own. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not Applicable.


  1. Afsar T, Razak S, Khan MR, Mawash S, Almajwa A, Shabir M, Haq IU (2016) Evaluation of antioxidant, anti-hemolytic and anticancer activity of various solvent extracts of Acacia hydaspica R. Parker aerial parts. BMC Complement Altern Med 16:258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1240-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal P, Miryala S, Varshney U (2015) Use of Mycobacterium smegmatis deficient in ADP ribosyl transferase as surrogate for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in drug testing and mutation analysis. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0122076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122076

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Aguilar-Pérez C, Gracia B, Rodrigues L, Vitoria A, Cebrián R, Deboosère N, Song O-R, Brodin P, Maqueda M, Aínsa JA (2018) Synergy between circular bacteriocin AS-48 and ethambutol against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00359-e418. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00359-18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Anand TP, Bhat AW, Shouche YS, Roy U, Siddharth J, Sarma SP (2005) Antimicrobial activity of marine bacteria associated with sponges from the waters off the coast of South East India. Microbiol Res 161(2006):252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2005.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aurea AE, Tanh LC, Mai LN, Philippe D (2011) Reverse-high performance liquid chromatography mechanism explained by polarization of stationary phase. CheM 1:62–79. https://doi.org/10.5618/chem.2011.v1.n1.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aurea AE, Roya S, Manolis NR, Philippe D (2014) An alternative to trial and error methodology in solid phase extraction: an original automated solid phase extraction procedure for analyzing PAHs and PAH-derivatives in soot. RSC Adv 4:33636. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra03214d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK (2016) Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharmaceut Anal 6(2):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Batista JH, da Neto JFN (2017) Chromobacterium violaceum pathogenicity: updates and insights from genome sequencing of novel chromobacterium species. Front Microbiol 8:2213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bizani D, Brandelli A (2002) Characterization of a bacteriocin produced by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. Strain 8 A. J Appl Microbiol 93(3):512–519. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01720.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bizani D, Motta AS, Morrissy JA, Terra R, Souto AA, Brandelli A (2005) Antibacterial activity of cerein 8A, a bacteriocin-like peptide produced by Bacillus cereus. Int Microbiol 8:125–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boelaert M, Jacobs J (2014) Fatal chromobacterium violaceum bacteraemia in rural Bandundu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. New Microbes New Infect 3:21–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2014.10.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cita YP, Suhermanto A, Radjasa OK, Sudharmono P (2017) Antibacterial activity of marine bacteria isolated from sponge Xestospongia testudinaria from Sorong. Papua Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 7(5):450–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao FH, Abee T, Konings WN (1991) Mechanism of action of the peptide antibiotic nisin in liposomes and cytochrome c oxidase-containing proteoliposomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 57(8):2164–2170. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.57.8.2164-2170.1991

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ge J, Sun Y, Xin X, Wang Y, Ping W (2016) Purification and partial characterization of a novel bacteriocin synthesized by Lactobacillus paracasei HD1-7 isolated from Chinese Sauerkraut juice. Sci Rep 6:19366. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19366

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gray EJ, Lee KD, Souleimanov AM, Falco MRD, Zhou X, Ly A, Charles TC, Driscoll BT, Smith DL (2006) A novel bacteriocin, thuricin 17, produced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria strain Bacillus thuringiensis NEB17: isolation and classification. J Appl Microbiol 100(3):545–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02822.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutsmann T (2016) Interaction between antimicrobial peptides and mycobacteria. Biochem Biophys Acta 1858:1034–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.01.031

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammami RA, Jaouadi B, Rebai A, Nesme X (2009) Optimization and biochemical characterization of a bacteriocin from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain 14B for biocontrol of Agrobacterium spp. Strains Lett Appl Microbiol 48(2):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02524.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kassaa A, Hober I, Hamze D, Chihib NE, Drider D (2014) Antiviral potential of lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins. Probiotics Antimicrob Prot 6:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-014-9162-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lange-Starke A, Petereit A, Truyen U, Braun PG, Fehlhaber K, Albert T (2014) Antiviral potential of selected starter cultures, bacteriocins and D, L-Lactic Acid. Food Environ Virol 6(1):42–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-013-9135-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Le CF, Fang CM, Sekaran SD (2017) Intracellular targeting mechanisms by antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02340-e2416. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02340-16

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SG, Chang HG (2018) Purification and characterization of mejucin, a new bacteriocin produced by Bacillus subtilis SN7. LWT Food Sci Technol 87:815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.044

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li XZ, Li Z, Hiroshi N (2004) Efflux pump-mediated intrinsic drug resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48(7):2415–2423. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.7.2415-2423.2004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193(1):265–275

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Malini M, Savitha J (2012) Heat stable bacteriocin from Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. tolerans isolated from locally available cheese: an in vitro study. J Biotechnol Pharm Res 3(2):28–41

    Google Scholar 

  25. Naafs MAB (2018) The antimicrobial peptides: ready for clinical trials? Biomed J Sci Technol Res. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.07.001536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park YS, Yang YJ, Kim YB, Hong JH, Lee C (2002) Characterization of subtilein, a bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis CAU131 (KCCM 10257). J Microbiol Biotechnol 12(2):228–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng JY, Horng YB, Wu CH, Chang CY, Tsai PS, Jeng CR, Cheng YH, Chang HW (2019) Evaluation of antiviral activity of Bacillus licheniformis-fermented products against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. AMB Express 9(1):191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0916-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfalzgraff A, Brandenburg K, Weindl G (2018) Antimicrobial peptides and their therapeutic potential for bacterial skin infections and wounds. Front Pharmacol 9:281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00281

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramya R, Chalasani AG, Lal R, Roy U (2014) A broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of Bacillus subtilis RLID 12.1. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/968487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Santhi SS, Aranganathan V (2019) Bioprospecting of some ethnomedicinal plants for potential antimycobacterial bacteriocin like inhibitory substances (BLIS). Explor Anim Med Res 9(2):180–187

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma G, Dang S, Gupta S, Gabrani R (2018) Antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and the mechanism of action of bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis GAS101. Med Princ Pract 27(2):186–192. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Silva DS, Castro CC, Silva FS, Santanna V, Vargas GD, Lima MD, Fischer G, Brandelli A, Motta AS, Hübner SO (2014) Antiviral activity of a Bacillus sp. P34 peptide against pathogenic viruses of domestic animals. Braz J Microbiol 45(3):1089–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sivaraj A, Sundar R, Manikkam R, Parthasarathy K, Rani U, Vanaja K (2018) Potential applications of lactic acid bacteria and bacteriocins in antimycobacterial therapy. Asian Pac J Trop Med 11(8):453–459. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-7645.240080

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sohail M, Sultana Q, Rasool K, Sarwar S, Basit A, Khalid M (2015) Bacteremia prediction by inflammatory factors and recent trend in drug resistance of bacteria isolated from blood stream infection. J Inf Mol Biol 3(3):75–80. https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.jimb/2015/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sosunov V, Mischenko V, Eruslanov B, Svetoch E, Shakina Y, Stern N, Majorov K, Sorokoumova G, Selishcheva A, Apt A (2007) Antimycobacterial activity of bacteriocins and their complexes with liposomes. J Antimicrob Chemother 59(5):919–925. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm053

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Soto PF (2014) Purification and characterization of an antimicrobial peptide produced by Bacillus sp. strain P7. Dissertation, University of Manchester.

  37. Starosila D, Rybalko S, Varbanetz L, Ivanskaya N, Sorokulova I (2017) Anti-influenza activity of a Bacillus subtilis probiotic strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00539-e617. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00539-17

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tagg JR, McGiven AR (1971) Assay system for bacteriocins. Appl Microbiol 21(5):943

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tiberi S, Muñoz-Torrico M, Duarte R, Dalcolmo M, D’Ambrosio L (2018) Migliori GB (2017) New drugs and perspectives for new anti-tuberculosis regimens. Pulmonology 24(2):86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.10.009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang X, Hu W, Zhu L, Yang Q (2017) Bacillus subtilis and surfactin inhibit the transmissible gastroenteritis virus from entering the intestinal epithelial cells. Biosci Rep 37(2):BSR20170082. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20170082

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. WHO (2017) Antibacterial agents in clinical development: an analysis of the antibacterial clinical development pipeline, including tuberculosis. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO/EMP/IAU/2017.12). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris. Accessed 20 Feb 2018

  42. WHO (2020) Report https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance. Accessed 31 July 2020

  43. Wolcott RD, Ehrlich GD (2008) Biofilms and chronic infections. JAMA 299(22):2682–2684. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.22.2682

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu J, Abbas HMK, Li J, Yuan Y, Liu Y, Wang G, Dong W (2020) Cell membrane-interrupting antimicrobial peptides from Isatis indigotica fortune isolated by a Bacillus subtilis expression system. Biomolecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang J, Yang Y, Yang H, Bu Y, Yi H, Zhang L, Han X, Ai L (2018) Purification and partial characterization of bacteriocin Lac-B23, a novel bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum J23, isolated from Chinese traditional fermented milk. Front Microbiol 9:2165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude and recognition for assistance from Dr. Solomon (with HPLC) and Mr. Regan Charles (with SEM analysis) of Department of Biotechnology, Jain (Deemed to-be) University.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information




The authors have contributed to designing this study, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Aranganathan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not Applicable.

Consent to participate

The authors give their consent to participate.

Consent for publication

The authors give their consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santhi Sudha, S., Aranganathan, V. Experimental elucidation of an antimycobacterial bacteriocin produced by ethnomedicinal plant-derived Bacillus subtilis (MK733983). Arch Microbiol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-02173-7

Download citation


  • Bacteriocin
  • Bacillus subtilis
  • Mycobacterium smegmatis
  • Broad inhibition spectrum