Advertisement

Temperature calculation of overhead power line conductors based on CIGRE Technical Brochure 601 in Slovakia

  • Martin Kanálik
  • Anastázia MargitováEmail author
  • Ľubomír Beňa
Original Paper
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

An overhead power line is a structure used in the electric power system to transmit electrical energy. The performance of overhead power lines depends on their parameters. An important parameter of the power line in the power system is its thermal limit. This article deals with the temperature calculation of overhead power line ACSR conductors according to the methodology stated in CIGRE Technical Brochure 601: Guide for thermal rating calculations of overhead lines. The calculated temperature is also compared with the measurement under laboratory conditions and also on a real power line in the Slovakia power system. At the end of the article, the dynamic thermal rating of ACSR conductors depending on climatic conditions is also calculated. Obtained results are compared with ampacity limits for summer and winter season used by Slovak transmission system operators. The article also compares the CIGRE Technical Brochure 601 with its older version CIGRE Technical Brochure 207: Thermal behavior of overhead conductors.

Keywords

Overhead power line ACSR conductor CIGRE Technical Brochure 601 CIGRE Technical Brochure 207 Dynamic thermal rating Ampacity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences under the contract VEGA No. 1/0372/18.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Beryozkina S, Sauhats A, Vanzovichs E (2011) Climate conditions impact on the permissible load current of the transmission line. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Trondheim PowerTech, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yan Z, Wang Y, Liang L (2017) Analysis on ampacity of overhead transmission lines being operated. J Inf Process Syst 13:1358–1371Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Šnajdr J, Sedláček J, Vostracký Z (2014) Application of a line ampacity model and its use in transmission lines operations. J Electr Eng 65:221–227Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanálik M, Margitová A, Urbanský J, Beňa Ľ (2019) Temperature calculation of overhead power line conductors according to the CIGRE Technical Brochure 207. In: Proceedings of the 20th international scientific conference on electric power engineering (EPE), pp 24–28Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez E, Albizu I, Bedialauneta M, Mazon A, Leite P (2016) Review of dynamic line rating systems for wind power integration. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teh J, Cotton I (2015) Critical span identification model for dynamic thermal rating system placement. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(16):2644–2652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Musilek P, Heckenbergerova J, Bhuiyan M (2012) Spatial analysis of thermal aging of overhead transmission conductors. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 27(3):1196–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quaia S (2018) Critical analysis of line loadability constraints. Int Trans Electr Energ Syst 24:1–11Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Medveď D, Mišenčík L, Kolcun M, Zbojovský J, Pavlík M (2015) Measuring of magnetic field around power lines. In: Proceedings of the 8th international scientific symposium Elektroenergetika, pp 148–51Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heckenbergerova J, Musilek P, Filimonenkov K (2013) Quantification of gains and risks of static thermal rating based on typical meteorological year. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 44(1):227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heckenbergerova J, Musilek P, Filimonenkov K (2011) Assessment of seasonal static thermal ratings of overhead transmission conductors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE power and energy society general meeting, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karimi S, Musilek P, Knight AM (2018) Dynamic thermal rating of transmission lines: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 91:600–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arroyo A, Castro P, Martinez R et al (2015) Comparison between IEEE and CIGRE thermal behaviour standards and measured temperature on a 132-kV overhead power line. Energies 8(12):13660–13671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fu J, Abbott S, Fox B, Morrow DJ, Abdelkader S (2010) Wind cooling effect on dynamic overhead line ratings. In: Proceedings of the 45th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abbott S, Abdelkader S, Bryans L, Flynn D (2010) Experimental validation and comparison of IEEE and CIGRE dynamic line models. In: Proceedings of the 45th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fu J, Morrow DJ, Abdelkader SM (2012) Integration of wind power into existing transmission network by dynamic overhead line rating. In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on large-scale integration of wind power into power systems, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Musavi M, Chamberlain D, Li Q (2011) Overhead conductor dynamic thermal rating measurement and prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on smart measurements of future grids (SMFG), pp 135–138Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kosec G, Maksić M, Djurica V (2017) Dynamic thermal rating of power lines—model and measurements in rainy conditions. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 91:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pytlak P, Musilek P, Lozowski E, Toth J (2011) Modelling precipitation cooling of overhead conductors. Electric Power Syst Res 81:2147–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    IEEE (2012) Standard for calculating the current-temperature relationship of bare overhead conductors. Std 738Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CIGRE, Working Group 22.12 (2002) Thermal behaviour of overhead conductors, Technical Brochure 207Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    CIGRE, Working Group B2.43 (2014) Guide for thermal rating calculation of overhead lines, Technical Brochure 601Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidt N (1999) Comparison between IEEE and CIGRE ampacity standards. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 14:1555–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michiorri A et al (2015) Forecasting for dynamic line rating. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1713–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simms M, Meegahapola L (2013) Comparative analysis of dynamic line rating models and feasibility to minimise energy losses in wind rich power networks. Energy Convers Manage 75:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu G, Li Y, Liu S, Dong X, Qu F, Li Y (2016) Real-time solar radiation intensity modeling for dynamic rating of overhead transmission lines. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ding Y, Gao M, Li Y et al (2016) The effect of calculated wind speed on the capacity of dynamic line rating. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on high voltage engineering and application (ICHVE), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    STN EN 50341-1: Overhead Electrical Lines Exceeding AC 45 kV. Part 1: General Requirements. Common Specifications (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electric Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and InformaticsTechnical University of KošiceKosiceSlovak Republic

Personalised recommendations