Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoring and enhanced dynamic modeling of battery by genetic algorithm using LabVIEW applied in photovoltaic system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic modeling of batteries used in photovoltaic systems (PVS), exceptionally in stand-alone or microgrid systems, is considered as an important issue and a major problem for the monitoring and simulation and even for fault detection applications. In this work, we propose as first step an enhancement of CIEMAT model by the improvement of 21 charge and discharge parameters; also we propose an enhancement of 4 parameters for the estimation approximately of the gassing and the saturation levels by a new static method using genetic algorithm. Basically, this method relies on static measurements by charging of the battery with different constant currents to give a more accurate estimation of this area. Furthermore, a real-time interface system using LabVIEW using the improved model was proposed in this work to provide online estimation and measurements of all battery data and characteristics in PVS. The proposed robust and low-cost method of simulation and monitoring can be applied for the study of battery fault detection in PVS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed R, El Sayed M, Arasaratnam I, Tjong J, Habibi S (2014) Reduced-order electrochemical model parameters identification and state of charge estimation for healthy and aged Li-ion batteries-part II: aged battery model and state of charge estimation. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 2(3):678–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed R, El Sayed M, Arasaratnam I, Tjong J, Habibi S (2014) Reduced-order electrochemical model parameters identification and soc estimation for healthy and aged Li-ion batteries part I: parameterization model development for healthy batteries. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 2(3):659–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sung W, Burm Shin C (2015) Electrochemical model of a lithium-ion battery implemented into an automotive battery management system. Comput Chem Eng 76:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xun J, Liu R, Jiao K (2013) Numerical and analytical modeling of lithium ion battery thermal behaviors with different cooling designs. J Power Sources 233:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salameh ZM, Casacca MA, Lynch WA (1992) A mathematical model for lead-acid batteries. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 7(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Copetti JB, Lorenzo E, Chenlo F (1993) A general battery model for PV system simulation. Prog Photovolt Res Appl I:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Copetti JB, Chenlo F (1994) Lead/acid batteries for photovoltaic applications. Test results and modelling. J Power Sources 47:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guasch D, Silvestre S (2003) Dynamic battery model for photovoltaic applications. Prog Photovolt Res Appl Prog Photovolt Res Appl 11:193–206. doi:10.1002/pip.480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Illanes R, De Francisco A, Núñez F, De Blas M, García A, Luis Torres J (2014) Dynamic simulation and modelling of stand-alone PV systems by using state equations and numerical integration methods. Appl Energy 135:440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Waag W, Uwe Sauer D (2013) Adaptive estimation of the electromotive force of the lithium-ion battery after current interruption for an accurate state-of-charge and capacity determination. Appl Energy 111:416–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu G, Ouyang M, Lu L, Li J, Hua J (2015) A highly accurate predictive-adaptive method for lithium-ion battery remaining discharge energy prediction in electric vehicle applications. Appl Energy 149:297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fares RL, Meyers JP, Webber ME (2014) A dynamic model-based estimate of the value of a vanadium redox flow battery for frequency regulation in Texas. Appl Energy 113:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceraolo M (2000) New dynamical models of lead-acid batteries. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(4):1184–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barsali S, Ceraolo M (2002) Dynamical models of lead-acid batteries: implementation issues. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 17(1):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu WH, Zhu Y, Tatarchuk BJ (2011) A simplified equivalent circuit model for simulation of Pb-acid batteries at load for energy storage application. Energy Convers Manag 52:2794–2799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karlo Nyarko E, Scitovski R (2004) Solving the parameter identification problem of mathematical models using genetic algorithms. Appl Math Comput 153:651–658

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran, vol 77, Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge

  18. Thirugnanam K, Ezhil Reena Joy TP, Singh M, Kumar P (2014) Mathematical modeling of Li-ion battery using genetic algorithm approach for V2G applications. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 29(2):332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zagrouba M, Sellami A, Bouacha M, Ksouri M (2010) Identification of PV solar cells and modules parameters using the genetic algorithms: application to maximum power extraction. Sol Energy 84:860–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng C, Chris Mi C, Fu Y, Xu J, Gong X (2013) Online battery state of health estimation based on genetic algorithm for electric and hybrid vehicle applications. J Power Sources 240:184e192

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gopalakrishnan H, Kosanovic D (2015) Operational planning of combined heat and power plants through genetic algorithms for mixed 0–1 nonlinear programming. Comput Oper Res 56:51–67

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmadizar F, Soltanian K, AkhlaghianTab F, Tsoulos I (2015) Artificial neural network development by means of a novel combination of grammatical evolution and genetic algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 39:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo J, Wang J, Cao B (2009) Application of genetic algorithm for braking force distribution of electric vehicles. 978-1-4244-2800-7/09/$25.00 \(\copyright \) 2009 IEEE

  24. Zhang L, Wang L, Hinds G, Lyu C, Zheng J, Li J (2014) Online battery state of health estimation based on genetic algorithm for electric and hybrid vehicle applications. J Power Sources 270:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ismail MS, Moghavvemi M, Mahlia TMI (2013) Characterization of PV panel and global optimization of its model parameters using genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 73:10–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dizqah AM, Maheri A, Busawon K (2014) An accurate method for the PV model identification based on a genetic algorithm and the interior-point method. Renew Energy 72:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gueguim Kana EB, Oloke JK, Lateef A, Adesiyan MO (2012) Modeling and optimization of biogas production on saw dust and other co-substrates using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Renew Energy 46:276e281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chan ALS (2016) Generation of typical meteorological years using genetic algorithm for different energy systems. Renew Energy 90:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi C, Teng G, Li Z (2016) An approach of pig weight estimation using binocular stereo system based on LabVIEW. Comput Electron Agric 129(1):37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Torres M, Munoz FJ, Munoz JV, Rus C (2012) Online monitoring system for stand-alone photovoltaic applications–analysis of system performance from monitored data. J Sol Energy Eng 134:034502-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Blaifi S, Moulahoum S, Colak I, Merrouche W (2016) An enhanced dynamic model of battery using genetic algorithm suitable for photovoltaic applications. Appl Energy 169:888–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Blaif S, Moulahoum S, Kabache N, Colak I (2015) An improved dynamic battery model suitable for photovoltaic applications. In: 4th International conference on renewable energy research and applications Palenno, Italy, pp 22–25

  33. Copetti JB, Chenlo F (1992) Internal resistance characterization of lead-acid batteries for PV rates. In: Proceedings of the 11th European PV solar energy conference, Montreux, pp 1116–1119

  34. Copetti JB, Chenlo F, Lorenzo E (1992) Comparison between charge and discharge models and real data for PV applications. In: Proceedings of the 11th European PV solar energy conference, Montreux, pp 1131–1134

  35. Castañer L, Silvestre S (2003) Front matter. In: Castaner RL, Silvestre S (eds) Modelling photovoltaic systems using PSpice . Wiley, p 376

  36. Gergaud O, Robin G, Multon B, Ben Ahmed H(2003) Energy modeling of a lead-acid battery within hybrid wind/photovoltaic systems. European Power Electronic Conference 2003, Toulouse, France, p 8

  37. Gopalakrishnan H, Kosanovic D (2015) Operational planning of combined heat and power plants through genetic algorithms for mixed 0–1 nonlinear programming. Comput Oper Res 56:51–67

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Laboratory of Electrical Engineering and automatics LREA, University of Médéa, Médéa, Algeria

    S. Blaifi & S. Moulahoum

  2. Engineering and Architecture Faculty, Nisantasi University, Istanbul, Turkey

    I. Colak

  3. Centre de Développement des Energies Renouvelables CDER, 16340, Algiers, Algeria

    W. Merrouche

Authors
  1. S. Blaifi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Moulahoum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Colak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. Merrouche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Colak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blaifi, S., Moulahoum, S., Colak, I. et al. Monitoring and enhanced dynamic modeling of battery by genetic algorithm using LabVIEW applied in photovoltaic system. Electr Eng 100, 1021–1038 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-017-0567-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-017-0567-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation