Electrical Engineering

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 607–623 | Cite as

A robust transmission line fault classification scheme using class-dependent feature and 2-Tier multilayer perceptron network

  • Mat Nizam Mahmud
  • Mohammad Nizam Ibrahim
  • Muhammad Khusairi Osman
  • Zakaria Hussain
Original Paper
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Faults frequently occur in transmission lines and become a major issue in power system engineering. It is an unavoidable incident and leads to many problems such as failure of equipment, instability in power flow and economical losses. Protection relay is a device installed in transmission lines to perform detection, classification and estimation of fault. The task must be performed accurately and fast to isolate the faulted phase and protect the system from the harmful effects of the fault. Fault classification involves the process of identifying the type of fault in the transmission lines. The presence of ground fault in three-phase faults has caused difficulty in identifying the fault types. This is due to the input signals that only contain three-phase currents/voltages and influenced by noise. Recent studies show that ANNs are powerful tools for fault classification. However, most studies utilized single ANN to classify all the faults, even though not all fault classes are equally difficult. This paper proposes a robust fault classification scheme using wavelet transform (WT) and 2-Tier multilayer perceptron (MLP) network. The first-Tier MLP network (MLP 1) is used to classify the three-phase fault (A, B and C), and the second-Tier MLP network (MLP 2) is used to identify the presence of ground fault. A new WT-based feature that properly describe the presence of ground fault called class-dependent feature (CDF) is formulated. The CDF is determined from the correlation between the output of MLP 1, wavelet mean and energy features. The CDF is fed into the MLP 2 and used to determine the presence of ground fault. Comparison performance with different MLP network structures indicated that the proposed method showed good classification accuracy. The average accuracy of CDF and 2-Tier MLP network for three different datasets, ideal (no noise), 20 and 30 dB, shows the highest with 99.36% as compared to other structures.

Keywords

Fault classification Transmission line Multilayer perceptron (MLP)  network Wavelet transform 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (Grant No. (FRGS/1/2015/TK04/UITM/03/1).

References

  1. 1.
    Upendar J, Gupta C, Singh G (2012) Statistical decision-tree based fault classification scheme for protection of power transmission lines. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 36:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tleis N (2007) Power systems modelling and fault analysis: theory and practice. Newnes, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geethanjali M, Priya KS (2009) Combined wavelet transforms and neural network (WNN) based fault detection and classification in transmission lines. In: 2009 international conference on control, automation, communication and energy conservation. INCACEC 2009, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta S, Kazi F, Wagh S, Kambli R (2015) Neural network based early warning system for an emerging blackout in smart grid power networks. In: Buyya R, Thampi S (eds) Intelligent distributed computing. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 321. Springer, Cham, pp 173–183Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dash P, Samantaray S, Panda G (2007) Fault classification and section identification of an advanced series-compensated transmission line using support vector machine. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 22:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahanty R, Gupta PD (2007) A fuzzy logic based fault classification approach using current samples only. Electr Power Syst Res 77:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parikh UB, Das B, Maheshwari R (2010) Fault classification technique for series compensated transmission line using support vector machine. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32:629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vyas B, Maheshwari RP, Das B (2014) Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques for fault type identification in advanced series compensated transmission lines. IETE J Res 60:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    He Z, Lin S, Deng Y, Li X, Qian Q (2014) A rough membership neural network approach for fault classification in transmission lines. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 61:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ekici S (2012) Support vector machines for classification and locating faults on transmission lines. Appl Soft Comput 12:1650–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vyas B, Das B, Maheshwari RP (2014) An improved scheme for identifying fault zone in a series compensated transmission line using undecimated wavelet transform and Chebyshev neural network. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 63:760–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang J, He Z, Lin S, Zhang Y, Qian Q (2013) An ANFIS-based fault classification approach in power distribution system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 49:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ray P, Panigrahi B, Senroy N (2012) Extreme learning machine based fault classification in a series compensated transmission line. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on power electronics, drives and energy systems (PEDES), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dasgupta A, Debnath S, Das A (2015) Transmission line fault detection and classification using cross-correlation and k-nearest neighbour. Int J Knowl-Based Intell Eng Syst 19:183–189Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaik AG, Pulipaka RRV (2015) A new wavelet based fault detection, classification and location in transmission lines. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fathabadi H (2016) Novel filter based ANN approach for short-circuit faults detection, classification and location in power transmission lines. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 74:374–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roy N, Bhattacharya K (2014) Signal-energy based fault classification of single-circuit transmission line using S-transform and neural network. In: Proceedings of the international conference on control, communication and power engineering (CCPE), pp 566–572Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reddy MJB, Rajesh DV, Mohanta D (2013) Robust transmission line fault classification using wavelet multi-resolution analysis. Comput Electr Eng 39:1219–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jaya Bharata Reddy M, Venkata Rajesh D, Mohanta D (2013) Robust transmission line fault classification using wavelet multi-resolution analysis. Comput Electr Eng 39:1219–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samantaray S (2009) Decision tree-based fault zone identification and fault classification in flexible AC transmissions-based transmission line. IET Gener Transm Distrib 3:425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andrade LC, Oleskovicz M, Fernandes RA (2016) Adaptive threshold based on wavelet transform applied to the segmentation of single and combined power quality disturbances. Appl Soft Comput 38:967–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goudarzi M, Vahidi B, Naghizadeh R, Hosseinian S (2015) Improved fault location algorithm for radial distribution systems with discrete and continuous wavelet analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 67:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gouda OE, El Dein AZ, Moukhtar I (2016) Performance of transformer differential relay at different neutral grounding resistance based on wavelet transform. Electr Eng 99(1):1–10Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    JianYi C, Raj A, Yuping L (2011) New algorithm for EHV transmission line faulted-phase selection based on wavelet transforms and artificial intelligence. In: 2011 international conference on advanced power system automation and protection (APAP), pp 2374–2379Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abohagar AA, Mustafa M (2012) Back propagation neural network aided wavelet transform for high impedance fault detection and faulty phase selection. In 2012 IEEE international conference on power and energy (PECon), pp 790–795Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    El-Zonkoly AM, Desouki H (2011) Wavelet entropy based algorithm for fault detection and classification in FACTS compensated transmission line. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33:1368–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Şengüler T, Şeker S (2016) Continuous wavelet transform for ferroresonance detection in power systems. Electr Eng. doi: 10.1007/s00202-016-0387-0
  28. 28.
    Jamil M, Kalam A, Ansari A, Rizwan M (2014) Generalized neural network and wavelet transform based approach for fault location estimation of a transmission line. Appl Soft Comput 19:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zheng-you H, Xiaoqing C, Guoming L (2006) Wavelet entropy measure definition and its application for transmission line fault detection and identification; (part I: definition and methodology). In: International conference on power system technology. 2006 PowerCon 2006, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jamil M, Sharma SK, Singh R (2015) Fault detection and classification in electrical power transmission system using artificial neural network, vol 4. SpringerPlus, London, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reyes-Archundia E, Moreno-Goytia E, Guardado J (2014) An algorithm based on travelling waves for transmission line protection in a TCSC environment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 60:367–377Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Çelik Ö, Teke A, Yıldırım HB (2016) The optimized artificial neural network model with Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for global solar radiation estimation in Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. J Clean Prod 116:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Benli H (2013) Determination of thermal performance calculation of two different types solar air collectors with the use of artificial neural networks. Int J Heat Mass Transf 60:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Asadi S, Hadavandi E, Mehmanpazir F, Nakhostin MM (2012) Hybridization of evolutionary Levenberg–Marquardt neural networks and data pre-processing for stock market prediction. Knowl-Based Syst 35:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saravanan A, Nagarajan DP (2013) Performance of ANN in pattern recognition for process improvement using Levenberg–Marquardt and quasi-Newton algorithms. IOSR J Eng 3:08–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kouhi S, Keynia F, Ravadanegh SN (2014) A new short-term load forecast method based on neuro-evolutionary algorithm and chaotic feature selection. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 62:862–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seckin N, Cobaner M, Yurtal R, Haktanir T (2013) Comparison of artificial neural network methods with L-moments for estimating flood flow at ungauged sites: the case of East Mediterranean River Basin, Turkey. Water Resour Manag 27:2103–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mat Nizam Mahmud
    • 1
  • Mohammad Nizam Ibrahim
    • 1
  • Muhammad Khusairi Osman
    • 1
  • Zakaria Hussain
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MARAPermatang PauhMalaysia

Personalised recommendations