This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.





References
- 1.
Cayrac M, Warembourg S, Le Normand L, Fatton B. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical practice guidelines]. Prog Urol. 2016;26(Suppl 1):S73–88.
- 2.
Rubod C, Brieu M, Cosson M, Rivaux G, Clay J-C, de Landsheere L, et al. Biomechanical properties of human pelvic organs. Urology. 2012;79:968.e17–22.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
M. Lallemant: data analysis, manuscript writing/editing; A. Vega: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis; J. Chambert: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing; E. Jacquet: protocol/project development, data collection or management; data analysis, manuscript writing/editing; R. Ramanah: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this Images inUrogynecology and any accompanying images.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lallemant, M., Vega, A., Chambert, J. et al. Biomechanical interests of supra-cervical hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy: first study using finite element modeling. Int Urogynecol J (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04664-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
- Finite element modeling
- Sacrocolpopexy
- Hysterectomy
- Pelvic organ prolapse
- Magnetic resonance imaging