Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium: managing complicated cases

Series 5: management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling exposure

Abstract

This case presents the work-up and management of a patient requesting surgical intervention for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after previous excision of a portion of her midurethral sling because of mesh exposure. Four international experts provide their approach to this complex case. There is little consensus regarding further surgery in a patient who has required mesh excision. Treatment by fascial sling was commonly considered and the literature review outlines the pros and cons of autologous fascia versus donor fascia for this specific case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Globerman D, Gagnon LH, Tang S, Brennand E, Kim-Fine S, Robert M. A prospective study investigating the diagnostic agreement between urodynamics and dynamic cystoscopy in women presenting with mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(5):823–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3671-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ramart P, Ackerman AL, Cohen SA, Kim JH, Raz S. The risk of recurrent urinary incontinence requiring surgery after suburethral sling removal for mesh complications. Urology. 2017;106:203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Syan R, Peyronnet B, Drain A, Enemchukwu E, Malacarne DR, Rosenblum N, et al. Exploring stress urinary incontinence outcomes after sling excision for perforation or exposure. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019;11(4):206–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bakali E, Buckley BS, Hilton P, et al. Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD009407. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009407.pub2.

  5. 5.

    Schmid C, Bloch E, Amann E, Mueller MD, Kuhn A. An adjustable sling in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous failed midurethral tape. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(4):573–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Errando C, Rodriguez-Escovar F, Gutierrez C, Baez C, Arano P, Villavicencio H. A re-adjustable sling for female recurrent stress incontinence and sphincteric deficiency: outcomes and complications in 125 patients using the Remeex sling system. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:1429–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lapitan MCM, Cody JD, Mashayekhi A. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(7):CD002912.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, Creta M, La Falce S, Waltregny D, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017a;72(4):567–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Peng M, Sussman RD, Escobar C, et al. Rectus fascia versus fascia lata for autologous fascial pubovaginal sling: a single-center comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Blaivas JG, Simma-Chiang V, Gul Z, Dayan L, Kalkan S, Daniel M. Surgery for stress urinary incontinence: autologous fascial sling. Urol Clin N Am. 2019;46:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bailly GG, Carlson KV. The pubovaginal sling: reintroducing an old friend. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(6 Suppl 2):S147–51. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mahdy A, Ghoniem GM. Autologous rectus fascia sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: A review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:S51–S58. httpSs5:/8/d.ohit.toprsg://1d0o.i1.o0r0g2//1n0a.u1.020328/7n8au.23878.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2143–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brubaker L, Richter HE, Norton PA, et al. 5 year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events on Burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012;187:1324–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Globerman D, Robert M. Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1373–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gutman RE. Apical support defects. In Bent AE, Cundiff GW, Swift SE, editors. Ostergard’s urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. 2008; p. 490.

  17. 17.

    Wheatcroft SM, Vardy SJ, Tyers AG. Complications of fascia lata harvesting for ptosis surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:581–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Plagakis S, Tse V. The autologous pubovaginal fascial sling: an update in 2019. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020;12:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Flynn BJ, Yap WT. Pubovaginal sling using allograft fascia lata versus autograft fascia for all types of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year minimum follow-up. J Urol. 2002;167:608–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    FitzGerald MP, Edwards SR, Fenner D. Medium-term follow-up on use of freeze-dried, irradiated donor fascia for sacrocolpopexy and sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J. 2004;15:238–42.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wright EJ, Iselin CE, Carr LK, et al. Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric allograft fascia for the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Urol. 1998;160:759.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Howden NS, Zyczynski HM, Moalli PA, Sagan ER, Meyn LA, Weber AM. Comparison of autologous rectus fascia and cadaveric fascia in pubovaginal sling continence outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1444–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fitzgerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Brubaker L. Failure of allograft suburethral slings. BJU Int. 1999;84:785.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Carbone JM, Kavaler E, Hu JC, et al. Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric fascia and bone anchors: disappointing early results. J Urol. 2001;165:1605.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Almeida SH, Gregório E, Grando JP, Rodrigues MA, Fraga FC, Moreira HA. Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric allograft fascia for the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(4):995–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:611–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ross S, Robert M, Swab C, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Itkonen Freitas AM, Mentula M, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Tulokas S, Mikkola TS. Tension-free vaginal tape surgery versus polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2020;203(2):372–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(8):1043–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0666-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ulrich D, Tammaa A, Hölbfer S, et al. Ten-year followup after tension-free vaginal tape-obturator procedure for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1201–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tamma A, Bjelic-Radisic V, Hölbfer S, et al. Sonographic sling position and cure rate 10-years after TVT-O procedure. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0209668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209668. [published correction appears in PLoS One. 201914;14(2):e0212597]

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017b;72(4):567–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin A. Brennand.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

E.A. Brennand: grant in-aid funding, for an investigator-initiated randomized clinical trial from Boston Scientific (ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02480231); C.L. Grimes: expert witness, Johnson and Johnson; H.W. Brown: receives royalties from Wolters-Kluwer (UpToDate, Inc.) and serves as a consultant for Grand Rounds, Inc.; F.G. Ugurlucan, S. Jeffery, P. Campbell, L.A. Yurteri-Kaplan: no relevant conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 2 Grades of evidence

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brennand, E.A., Ugurlucan, F.G., Brown, H.W. et al. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium: managing complicated cases. Int Urogynecol J (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04385-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mesh exposure
  • Midurethral sling
  • Recurrent stress urinary incontinence