The effect of replacing vacuum with forceps in operative vaginal delivery: an observational study

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

An increase in vaginal delivery with forceps may increase rates of pelvic floor trauma. This study was designed to predict trauma rates resulting from policies preferencing forceps.

Methods

This is an observational cohort study utilizing data from 660 primiparae enrolled in an RCT in two tertiary obstetric units in Sydney, Australia. Participants were assessed clinically and with 4D translabial ultrasound in the late third trimester and again at 3–6 months postpartum. Incidence of trauma associated with mode of delivery was adjusted to reflect change associated with a conversion of vacuum to forceps delivery. Primary outcome measures were third-/fourth-degree tear, levator avulsion (LA) and external anal sphincter (EAS) trauma diagnosed sonographically.

Results

Five hundred four women were seen at a mean of 5.1 (2.3–24.3) months postpartum. After exclusion of 21 because of missing data, 483 women were analysed: 112 (23%) had a CS, 268 (55%) a normal vaginal delivery (NVD), 69 (14%) a vacuum (VD) and 34 (7%) a forceps (FD). One hundred fifty-two women had EAS trauma and/or LA; 17 sustained both. After VD, 32/69 (46%) women suffered LA and/or EAS trauma; after FD, it was 33/34 (97%). Converting VD to FD was estimated to result in an increase in trauma from 152/483 (31%) to 187/483 (39%). A formula can be generated based on local obstetric and ultrasound data to estimate trauma incidence.

Conclusions

A change in obstetric practice resulting in the conversion of primary VD to primary FD would be expected to substantially increase the likelihood of pelvic floor trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

SD:

Standard deviation

BMI:

Body mass index

CS:

Caesarean section

NVD:

Normal vaginal delivery

VD:

Vacuum delivery

FD:

Forceps delivery

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

OASI:

Obstetric anal sphincter injury

PFMC:

Pelvic floor muscle contraction

US:

Ultrasound

References

  1. 1.

    Anonymous. Health at a Glance 2017. OECD Indic. 2017:280. https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2017-en.

  2. 2.

    AIHW. Australia’s Health 2018.; 2018. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/f434bda2-19f9-4a6f-ba8b-71d3008d17a4/aihw-aus-221-chapter-7-15.pdf.aspx. Accessed July 10, 2018.

  3. 3.

    Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:179–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lagrew DC, Low LK, Brennan R, et al. National Partnership for maternal safety: consensus bundle on safe reduction of primary Cesarean births— supporting intended vaginal births. J Midwifery Women’s Heal. 2018;63:235–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nash Z, Nathan B, Mascarenhas L. Kielland’s forceps. From controversy to consensus? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Talukdar S, Purandare N, Coulter-Smith S, Geary M. Is it time to rejuvenate the forceps? J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63:218–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Burke N, Field K, Mujahid F, Morrison JJ. Use and safety of Kielland’s forceps in current obstetric practice. Am J Obs Gynecol. 2012:766–70.

  8. 8.

    Skinner S, Davies-Tuck M, Wallace E, Hodges R. Perinatal and maternal outcomes after training residents in forceps before vacuum instrumental birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:615–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dietz HP, Shek C, Clarke B. Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(6):580–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dietz HP, Bernardo MJ, Kirby A, Shek KL. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:699–705.

  12. 12.

    Shek KL, Guzman-Rojas R, Dietz HP. Residual defects of the external anal sphincter following primary repair: an observational study using transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(6):704–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guzmán Rojas RA, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence in urogynecological patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:363–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kamisan Atan I, Shek K, Langer S, et al. Does the Epi-no ® birth trainer prevent vaginal birth-related pelvic floor trauma? A multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2016;123(6):995–1003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Short- and long-term outcomes after cesarean section. Expert Rev Obs Gynecol. 2011;6(2):205–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Caughey AB, Sandberg PL, Zlatnik MG, Mari-Paul T, Parer JT, Laros Jr RK. Forceps compared with vacuum: Rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality. 2005;106:908–912.

  17. 17.

    Volløyhaug I, Mørkved S, Salvesen Ø, Salvesen KÅ. Forceps delivery is associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse and muscle trauma: a cross-sectional study 16-24 years after first delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:487–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Friedman T, Eslick G, Dietz HP. Delivery mode and the risk of levator muscle avulsion: a meta- analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30(6);901–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3827-8.

  19. 19.

    Friedman T, Eslick G, Dietz H. Instrumental delivery and the risk of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI): a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(S1):S30–1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dietz HP. Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(3):220–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Martin A, et al. Intrapartum predictors of maternal levator ani injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:426–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dietz HP and Steensma A. The prevalence of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG 2006; 113: 225-30

  23. 23.

    Shek KL, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(12):1485–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dietz HP, Simpson JM. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(8):979–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Kluivers K. Levator ani muscle avulsion during childbirth: a risk prediction model. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(9):1155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, JOL DL. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):144–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr G, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery ( review ). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:1–103.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kamisan Atan I, Lin S, Dietz HP, Herbison P, Wilson PD. It is the first birth that does the damage: a cross-sectional study 20 years after delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; Published(21.3.18). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3616-4.

  30. 30.

    Dietz HP, Walsh CE, Friedman T, Subramaniam N. Levator avulsion and vaginal parity: do subsequent vaginal births matter? Int Urogynecol J. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04330-4.

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J Caudwell-Hall: Data collection and analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

C Shek: Data collection, manuscript editing.

S Langer: Data collection, Research Midwife.

HP Dietz: Project development, data collection and analysis, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Peter Dietz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Prof. H.P. Dietz and C. Shek have received unrestricted educational grants from GE Medical. The other authors have no potential conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caudwell Hall, J., Shek, C., Langer, S. et al. The effect of replacing vacuum with forceps in operative vaginal delivery: an observational study. Int Urogynecol J (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04352-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Levator avulsion
  • Birth trauma
  • Forceps
  • Urogynaecology
  • Pelvic organ prolapse
  • Ultrasound