Skip to main content
Log in

Entry into the anterior cul-de-sac during vaginal hysterectomy

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We present a video reviewing the key steps involved in safe anterior cul-de-sac entry during vaginal hysterectomy, including tips for troubleshooting difficult cases such as: uterine procidentia, cervical elongation, and multiple prior cesarean sections.

Methods

Anterior cul-de-sac entry is a critical step in performing a vaginal hysterectomy. In this video, we review our approach to anterior entry in patients with normal anatomy, followed by a discussion of techniques that may be useful in cases with challenging anatomy. To start, we drain the bladder, set up exposure with Deaver retractors, and make a circumferential incision at the cervicovaginal junction. In cases with normal anatomy, using sharp, followed by broad blunt finger dissection, the vesicocervical space is opened, and the peritoneal reflection is identified and sharply entered. If this is not possible, additional techniques such cystoscopic bladder illumination, posterior entry first, securing pedicles with extraperitoneal ties, or additional sharp dissection may be utilized. With all techniques, proper intraperitoneal entry should be verified by the visualization of small bowel or fat.

Conclusion

This video reviews technical considerations for anterior cul-de-sac entry during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with normal anatomy and provides tips for troubleshooting challenging cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Committee on Gynecologic, P. Committee opinion no 701: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD003677.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doucette RC, Sharp HT, Alder SC. Challenging generally accepted contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmitt JJ, Occhino JA, Weaver AL, et al. Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy with and without perceived contraindications to vaginal surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000469.

  6. Burkett D, Horwitz J, Kennedy V, et al. Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17:210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmitt JJ, Carranza Leon DA, Occhino JA, et al. Determining optimal route of hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical decision tree algorithm. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Magrina JF. Self-retaining retractor for vaginal operations. J Gynecol Surg. 1991;7:33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Latthe P, Kadian S, Parsons M, et al. Survey of use of local infiltration and vasoconstrictors in vaginal surgery. Gynecol Surg. 2007;4:187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Linder.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 80676 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linder, B.J., Gebhart, J.B. Entry into the anterior cul-de-sac during vaginal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 29, 1223–1225 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3646-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3646-y

Keywords

Navigation