Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A normal flow pattern in women does not exclude voiding pathology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is a widespread assumption that normal micturition behaviour is reflected in a normal flow pattern. This would also mean that a normal flow curve would correspond with normal voiding and would even permit to exclude voiding difficulties. In our study we investigated the value of a normal flow pattern in four different groups: stress incontinent women, women with bladder overactivity, healthy middle-aged volunteers and healthy students. These women voided with a bell-shaped flow curve on pressure flow in 50, 65, 57 and 50%, respectively. Women who strained to void, a major component of dysfunctional voiding, managed to void a bell-shaped flow curve in 46, 60, 70 and 100%, respectively. Our study demonstrates that a “normal” bell-shaped flow curve does not exclude voiding dysfunction in women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spanberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21:261–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jorgensen JB, Colstrup H, Frimodt-Moller C (1998) Uroflow in women: an overview and suggestions for the future. Int Urogynecol J 9:33–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haylen BT, Parys BT, Anyaegbunam WI, Ashby D, West CR (1990) Urine flow rates in male and female urodynamic patients compared with the Liverpool nomograms, Br J Urol 65:483–487

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wyndaele JJ (1999) Normality in urodynamics studied in healthy adults. J Urol 161:899–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ (2002) Cystometrical sensory data from a normal population: comparison of two groups of young healthy volunteers examined with 5 years interval. Eur Urol 42:34–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brink CA, Wells TJ, Sampselle CM, Taillie ER, Mayer R (1994) A digital test for pelvic muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence. Nurs Res 43:352–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen F, Olsen L, Atan A, Nordling J (1999) Pressure-flow studies: short-time repeatability. Neurourol Urodyn 18:205–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karram MM, Partoll L, Bilotta V, Angel O (1997) Factors affecting detrusor contraction strength during voiding in women. Obstet Gynecol 90:723–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ (2003) Quest for standardisation of electrical sensory testing in the lower urinary tract: the influence of technique related factors on bladder electrical thresholds. Neurourol Urodyn 22:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Axelrod SL, Blaivas JG (1987) Bladder neck obstruction in women. J Urol 137:497–499

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Costantini E, Mearini E, Pajoncini C, Biscotto S, Bini V, Porena M (2003) Uroflowmetry in female voiding disturbances. Neurourol Urodyn 22:569–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Onyeka BA (2003) A prospective study of the contribution of uroflowmetry in urodynamic investigation. J Obstet Gynecol 23:191–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lose G (1997) Uroflowmetry and pressure/flow study of voiding in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 166:43–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bottaccini MR, Gleason DM (1980) Urodynamic norms in women. I. Normals versus stress incontinents. J Urol 124:659–662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lemack GE, Baseman AG, Zimmern PE (2002) Voiding dynamics in women: a comparison of pressure-flow studies between asymptomatic and incontinent women. Urology 59:42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haylen BT, Ashby D, Sutherst JR, Fraze MI, West CR (1989) Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations—the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol 64:30–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shafik A (1991) Straining urethral reflex: description of a reflex and its clinical significance. Preliminary report. Acta Anat (Basel) 140:104–107

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shafik A (1991) Straining puborectails reflex: description and significance of a “new” reflex. Anat Rec 229:281–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Susset JG, Smith SJ (1980) Dynamics of obstruction in acontractile bladder: attempt at management. Urology 15:240–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang JM, Huang WC (2002) Implications of abdominal straining in women with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 60:428–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iglesia CB, Shott S, Fenner DE, Brubaker L (1998) Effect of preoperative voiding mechanism on success rate of autologous rectus fascia suburethral sling procedure. Obstet Gynecol 91:577–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sjöberg B, Nyman CR (1982) Hydrodynamics of micturition in stress-incontinent women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 16:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Devreese AM, Nuyens G, Staes F, Vereecken RL, De Weerdt W, Stappaerts K (2000) Do posture and straining influence urinary-flow parameters in normal women? Neurourol Urodyn 19:3–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. JJ Wyndaele (1989) Micturition reeducation in nonneurogenic women who strain to void. Neurourol Urodyn 8:359–360

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carlson KV, Rome S, Nitti VW (2001) Dysfunctional voiding in women. J Urol 165:143–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marinkovic SP, Stanton SL (2004) Incontinence and voiding difficulties associated with prolapse. J Urol 171:1021–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Edward Pauwels and his assistant Agnes De Cauwer for their help in recruiting healthy volunteers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Jacques Wyndaele.

Additional information

Editorial Comment: It is assumed that normal voiding behavior is reflected in a normal flow pattern, but it is unknown whether one can assume the correlate, that is whether a normal flow curve corresponds to normal voiding. To answer this question, the authors prospectively evaluated free flow and pressure flow patterns in four groups—women with SUI, women with OAB, healthy middle-aged women and young healthy female students. They found that normal bell-shaped free-flow curves were found in 67–83% and bell-shaped pressure flow curves were found in 50–65%. They then showed that bell-shaped flow curves were found in 24 patients who had evidence of abdominal straining during micturition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pauwels, E., De Wachter, S. & Wyndaele, JJ. A normal flow pattern in women does not exclude voiding pathology. Int Urogynecol J 16, 104–108 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1227-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1227-8

Keywords

Navigation