Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear policy behavior, multiple equilibria and debt-deflation attractors

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes global dynamics in a macroeconomic model where both monetary and fiscal policies are nonlinear, consistent with empirical evidence. Nonlinear monetary policy, in which the nominal interest rate features an increasing marginal reaction to inflation, interacting with nonlinear fiscal policy, in which the primary budget surplus features an increasing marginal reaction to debt, gives rise to four steady-state equilibria. Each steady state exhibits in its neighborhood a pair of ‘active’/‘passive’ monetary/fiscal policies à la Leeper-Woodford, and is typically investigated in isolation within linearized monetary models. We show that, when global nonlinear dynamics are taken into account, such steady states are endogenously connected. In particular, the global dynamics reveals the existence of infinite self-fulfilling paths that originate around the steady states locally displaying either monetary or fiscal ‘dominance’—and thus locally delivering equilibrium determinacy—as well as around the unstable steady state with active monetary-fiscal policies, and that converge into an unintended high-debt/low-inflation (possibly deflation) attractor. Such global trajectories—bounded by two heteroclinic orbits connecting the three out-of-the-trap steady states—are, however, obscured if the four monetary-fiscal policy mixes are studied locally and disjointly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As the discussion of the related literature in the following section shall point out, the body of studies empirically supporting the scope for nonlinear feedback interest rate policy rules is large. It includes, for instance, Dolado et al. (2000, 2004, 2005), Martin and Milas (2004), Taylor and Davradakis (2006), Petersen (2007), Cukierman and Muscatelli (2008), Hayat and Mishra (2010), Castro (2011), Klose (2011), Miles and Schreyer (2012, 2014), Naraidoo and Paya (2014), Lee and Son (2013), Kulikauskas (2014), Neuenkirch and Tillmann (2014), Sznajderska (2014), Ma (2016), and Shen et al. (2016).

  2. The empirical research detecting nonlinear fiscal adjustments is also extensive. It includes, for example, Bohn (1998), Sarno (2001), Arestis et al. (2004), Bajo-Rubio et al. (2004, 2006), Arghyrou and Luintel (2007), Chortareas et al. (2008), Considine and Gallagher (2008), Cipollini et al. (2009), Legrenzi and Milas (2012a, b, 2013), Arghyrou and Fan (2013), and Piergallini and Postigliola (2013).

  3. Piergallini (2016) shows that a fiscal policy displaying convex nonlinearity in the surplus-debt relationship is an independent source of multiplicity of steady-state equilibria. To establish this result, he assumes a conventional linear Taylor rule. By contrast, in this paper we attempt to analyze the dynamic effects of a nonlinear behavior in fiscal policy conduct interacting with a nonlinear behavior in monetary policy conduct.

  4. Fiscal policy is ‘passive’ (‘active’) in Leeper’s (1991) sense when the primary budget surplus set by the government brings about local stability (instability) of government liabilities for all stable paths of the other endogenous variables—such as inflation and output—in the neighborhood of a steady state. Monetary policy is ‘active’ (‘passive’) in Leeper’s (1991) sense when the nominal interest rate set by the central bank increases by more (less) than one-for-one with respect to an increase in the inflation rate, thereby verifying (violating) the Taylor (1993) principle (Woodford 2003). See Canzoneri et al. (2011), and Leeper and Leith (2016) for comprehensive analyzes and literature reviews on the interactions between monetary and fiscal policies.

  5. This assumption is meant to guarantee that, at the steady states, real money demand is bounded, as in Benhabib et al. (2001).

  6. For simplicity and without loss of generality, we set public consumption equal to zero.

  7. This assumption is meant to ensure that, at the steady states, government liabilities are strictly positive.

  8. From Eq. 27, uniqueness of \(\bar {\lambda }\) holds under standard functional forms for preferences and technology. See Benhabib et al. (2001).

References

  • Agliari A, Naimzada A, Pecora N (2017) Nonlinear monetary policy rules in a pure exchange overlapping generations model. J Evol Econ 27:1181–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Drazen A (1991) Why are stabilizations delayed?. Amer Econ Rev 81:1170–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis P, Cipollini A, Fattouh B (2004) Threshold effects in the U.S. budget deficit. Econ Inq 42:214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arghyrou MG, Luintel KB (2007) Government solvency: revisiting some EMU countries. J Macroecon 29:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arghyrou MG, Fan J (2013) UK fiscal policy sustainability, 1955-2006. Manchester Sch 81:961–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajo-Rubio O, Diaz-Roldan C, Esteve V (2004) Searching for threshold effects in the evolution of budget deficits: an application to the Spanish case. Econ Lett 82:239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajo-Rubio O, Diaz-Roldan C, Esteve V (2006) Is the budget deficit sustainable when fiscal policy is non-linear? The case of Spain. J Macroecon 28:596–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib J, Schmitt-Grohé S, Uribe M (2001) The perils of Taylor rules. J Econ Theory 96:40–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib J, Schmitt-Grohé S, Uribe M (2002) Avoiding liquidity traps. J Polit Econ 110:535–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola G, Drazen A (1993) Trigger points and budget cuts: explaining the effects of fiscal austerity. Amer Econ Rev 83:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn H (1998) The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. Q J Econ 113:949–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock WA (1974) Money and growth: the case of long-run perfect foresight. Int Econ Rev 15:750–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canzoneri MB, Cumby R, Diba B (2011) The interaction between monetary and fiscal policy. In: Friedman B, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of monetary economics. North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam and Boston, pp 935–999

  • Castro V (2011) Can central banks’ monetary policy be described by a linear (augmented) Taylor rule or by a nonlinear rule?. J Financ Stab 7:228–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chortareas G, Kapetanios G, Uctum M (2008) Nonlinear alternatives to unit root tests and public finances sustainability: some evidence from Latin American and Caribbean countries. Oxford Bullet Econ Stat 70:645–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini A, Fattouh B, Mouratidis K (2009) Fiscal readjustments in the United States: a nonlinear time-series analysis. Econ Inq 47:34–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida R, Galí J, Gertler M (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarter J Econ 115:147–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine J, Gallagher LA (2008) UK debt sustainability: some nonlinear evidence and theoretical implications. Manchester Sch 76:320–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman A, Muscatelli A (2008) Nonlinear taylor rules and asymmetric preferences in central banking: evidence from the United Kingdom and the United States. BE J Macroecon 8:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolado J, María-Dolores R, Naveira M (2000) Asymmetries in monetary policy rules: evidence for four central Banks. CEPR Discussion Papers 2441, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

  • Dolado J, Maria-Dolores R, Ruge-Murcia FJ (2004) Nonlinear monetary policy rules: some new evidence for the US. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econ 8:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolado J, Maria-Dolores R, Naveira M (2005) Are monetary-policy reaction functions asymmetric?: The role of nonlinearity in the Phillips curve. Eurasian Econ Rev, Elsevier 49(2):485–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Nelson RR (1994) An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. J Evol Econ 4:153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayat A, Mishra S (2010) Federal reserve monetary policy and the non-linearity of the Taylor rule. Econ Modell 27:1292–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klose J (2011) Asymmetric Taylor reaction functions of the ECB: an approach depending on the state of the economy. North Amer J Econ Financ 22:149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulikauskas D (2014) Nonlinear taylor rule for the European Central Bank. Econ Bullet 34:1798–1804

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DJ, Son JC (2013) Nonlinearity and structural breaks in monetary policy rules with stock prices. Econ Modell 31:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeper EM (1991) Equilibria under ‘Active’ and ‘Passive’ Monetary and fiscal policies. J Monet Econ 27:129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeper EM, Leith C (2016) Understanding inflation as a joint monetary-fiscal phenomenon. In: Taylor JB, Uhlig H (eds) Handbook of Macroeconomics 2. North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2305–2415

  • Legrenzi G, Milas C (2012a) Nonlinearities and the sustainability of the government’s intertemporal budget constraint. Econ Inq 50:988–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrenzi G, Milas C (2012b) Fiscal Policy Sustainability, Economic Cycle and Financial Crises: The Case of the GIPS, Working Paper Series 54-12, The Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis

  • Legrenzi G, Milas C (2013) Modelling the fiscal reaction functions of the GIPS based on state-varying thresholds. Econ Lett, Elsevier 121(3):384–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y (2016) Nonlinear monetary policy and macroeconomic stabilization in emerging market economies: evidence from China. Econ Syst 40:461–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin M, Milas C (2004) Modelling monetary policy: inflation targeting in practice. Economica 71:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles W, Schreyer S (2012) Is monetary policy non-linear in Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand? A quantile regression analysis. Asian-Pac Econ Lit 26:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles W, Schreyer S (2014) Is monetary policy non-linear in Latin America? A quantile regression approach to brazil, chile, mexico and peru. J Dev Areas 48:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naraidoo R, Paya I (2014) Forecasting monetary policy rules in South Africa. Int J Forecast 28:446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuenkirch M, Tillmann P (2014) Inflation targeting, credibility, and non-linear Taylor rules. J Int Money Financ 41:30–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen KB (2007) Does the Federal Reserve Follow a Non-linear Taylor Rule?, Working Paper 2007-37 University of Connecticut, Department of Economics

  • Piergallini A (2016) A note on nonlinear fiscal regimes and interest rate policy. Macroecon Dyn 20:832–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piergallini A, Postigliola M (2013) Non-linear budgetary policies: evidence from 150 years of Italian public finance. Econ Lett 121:495–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radzicki ML, Sterman GD (1994) Evolutionary economics and system dynamics. In: England RW (ed) Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

  • Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38:543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis R (2007) The analytics of monetary non-neutrality in the Sidrauski model. Econ Lett 94:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg JJ (1982) Sticky prices in the United States. J Polit Econ 90:1187–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno L (2001) The behavior of US public debt: a nonlinear perspective. Econ Lett 74:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen C-H, Lin K-L, Guo N (2016) The hawk or dove: switching regression model for the monetary policy reaction function in China. Pac-Basin Financ J 36:94–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sznajderska A (2014) Asymmetric effects in the polish monetary policy rule. Econ Modell 36:547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JB (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Publ Policy 39:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MP, Davradaki E (2006) Interest rate setting and inflation targeting: evidence of a nonlinear Taylor rule for the United Kingdom. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econ 10:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford M (2003) Interest and prices. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to three anonymous referees for many valuable comments and suggestions. I also wish to thank Giorgio Rodano for very helpful discussions on this line of enquiry and Paolo Canofari, Alessia Franzini, Alessandro Leopardi and Michele Postigliola for very useful comments and remarks. The usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Piergallini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piergallini, A. Nonlinear policy behavior, multiple equilibria and debt-deflation attractors. J Evol Econ 29, 563–580 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0562-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0562-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation