Skip to main content
Log in

Learning by replicator and best-response: the importance of being indifferent

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares two learning processes, namely those generated by replicator and best-response dynamics, from the point of view of the asymptotics of play. We base our study on the intersection of the basins of attraction of locally stable pure Nash equilibria for replicator and best-response dynamics. Local stability implies that the basin of attraction has positive measure but there are examples where the intersection of the basin of attraction for replicator and best-response dynamics is arbitrarily small. We provide conditions, involving the existence of an unstable interior Nash equilibrium, for the basins of attraction of any locally stable pure Nash equilibrium under replicator and best-response dynamics to intersect in a set of positive measure. Hence, for any choice of initial conditions in sets of positive measure, if a pure Nash equilibrium is locally stable, the outcome of learning under either procedure coincides. We provide examples illustrating the above, including some for which the basins of attraction exactly coincide for both learning dynamics. We explore the role that indifference sets play in the coincidence of the basins of attraction of the stable Nash equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A homogeneous equation is one that does not exhibit constant terms.

  2. The invariance of S i is readily checked by looking at the best-response on either side of itsboundaries. Using Fig. 1as an illustration, if between the boundary ofS 2consisting of Z 1,2and the part of Z 2,3immediately above it the best-response is e 1then S 2is invariant. If, on the other hand, the best-response for the same set of points ise 3, then S 2is not invariant.

References

  • Brown GW (1949) Some notes on computation of games solutions, The Rand Corporation, Report P-78

  • Golman R, Page SE (2010) Basins of attraction and equilibrium selection under different learning rules. J Evol Econ 20:49–72. Erratum, J. Evol. Econ. 20, 73–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (2002) Evolutionary games and population dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (2003) Evolutionary game dynamics. B Am Math Soc 40(4):479–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J, Sorin S, Viossat Y (2009) Time average replicator and best reply dynamics. Math Operations Res 10(2):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui A (1992) Best response dynamics and socially stable strategies. J Econ Theory 57:343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochea MI (2010) Essays on nonlinear evolutionary game dynamics. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam. http://hdl.handle.net/11245/2.71860

  • Zeeman EC (1980) Population dynamics from game theory. In: Global theory of dynamical systems (Proceedings Conference Northwestern University 1979), lecture notes in mathematics, vol 819, pp 472–497

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Hofbauer J (2015) Equilibrium selection via replicator dynamics in 2 × 2 coordination games. Int J Game Theory 44:433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to S. van Strien for stimulating conversations. These took place during a visit of mine to Imperial College London, whose hospitality is gratefully acknowledged.

Many thanks also to J. Hofbauer for his insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper, and to J. Gaspar for help with the numerical simulations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia B. S. D. Castro.

Ethics declarations

This study was partly supported by Centro de Matemática da Universidade do Porto (UID/MAT/00144/2013), funded by the Portuguese Government through the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia with national (Ministério da Educação e Ciência) and European structural funds through the programs FEDER, under the partnership agreement PT2020, as well as by a grant from the Reitoria da Universidade do Porto.

Conflict of interests

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castro, S.B.S.D. Learning by replicator and best-response: the importance of being indifferent. J Evol Econ 28, 985–999 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0547-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0547-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation