Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution and correlated equilibrium

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given a normal form game and a signal generating process, we construct an expanded game in the spirit of Aumann (Econometrica 55(1):1–18, 1987) in which agents condition their strategic choices on perceived signals. We collect results on evolutionary selection dynamics of Ritzberger and Weibull (Econometrica 63(6):1371–1399, 1995), Swinkels (J Econ Theory 57(2):306–332, 1992b) and Samuelson and Zhang (J Econ Theory 57:363–391, 1992) to apply them to normal form games with payoff irrelevant signals. We suggest a selection dynamic for the evolution of signals and characterize the set of signal distributions and induced payoffs for sets that are asymptotically stable with respect to this evolutionary selection on signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The concept of evolutionary game theory originates from biology. See Dawkins (1990) or Björnerstedt and Weibull (1996) for socio-economic interpretations.

  2. See Hart and Mas-Colell (2000), p. 1132 “(4) ... This implies, in particular, that interior (relative to Δ(S)) points of the set of correlated equilibria that are not pure Nash equilibria are unreachable as the limit of some z t [, the empirical distribution of play.] ...”

  3. Proposition 2 in Lenzo and Sarver (2006)

  4. By the Picard-Lindelöf Theorem, there exists a unique solution \(\hat \rho (\cdot ,\rho )\) for each initial condition \(\rho \in {\Delta }_{\mathcal {R}}\); see Weibull (1995) pp.232.

  5. See also Swinkels (1992a), p.315

  6. More technically, the suggestion is to increase the probability mass π(γ ) or to decrease the probability mass π(γ ).

References

  • Aumann RJ (1974) Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. J Math Econ 1(1):67–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ (1987) Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality. Econometrica 55(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björnerstedt J, Weibull JW (1996) Nash equilibrium and evolution by imitation. In: Arrow K, Colombatto E, Perlman M, Schmidt C (eds) The rational foundations of economic behaviour. Macmillan, London, pp 155–171

  • Cripps M (1991) Correlated equilibria and evolutionary stability. J Econ Theory 55(2):428–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1990) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Germano F (2007) Stochastic evolution of rules for playing finite normal form games. Theor Decis 62(4):311–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S (2005) Adaptive dynamics. Econometrica 73(5):1401–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Mas-Colell A (2000) A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium. Econometrica 68(5):1127–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Mas-Colell A (2003) Uncoupled dynamics do not lead to Nash equilibrium. The American Economic Review 93(5):1830–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Mas-Colell A (2013) Simple adaptive strategies: from regret-matching to uncoupled dynamics, vol. 4 of World Scientific Series in Economic Theory. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koch LP (2008) Evolution and correlated equilibrium. Bonn Econ Discussion Paper 14/2008

  • Lenzo J, Sarver T (2006) Correlated equilibrium in evolutionary models with subpopulations. Games Econ Behav 56(2):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailath GJ, Samuelson L, Shaked A (1997) Correlated equilibria and local interactions. Econ Theory 9(3):551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflict. J Theor Biol 47:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzberger K, Weibull JW (1995) Evolutionary selection in normal-form games. Econometrica 63(6):1371–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson L, Zhang J (1992) Evolutionary stability in asymmetric games. J Econ Theory 57:363–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm WH (2011) Population games and evolutionary dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1980) A Note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetric animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 84:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B (2010) Signals: evolution, learning, and information. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swinkels JM (1992a) Evolution and strategic stability: from Maynard Smith to Kohlberg and Mertens. J Econ Theory 57:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinkels JM (1992b) Evolutionary stability with equilibrium entrants. J Econ Theory 57(2):306–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P, Jonker L (1978) Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math Biosci 40:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull JW (1995) Evolutionary game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars P. Metzger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Metzger, L.P. Evolution and correlated equilibrium. J Evol Econ 28, 333–346 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0539-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0539-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation