Skip to main content
Log in

Price versus quality competition: in search for Schumpeterian evolution mechanisms

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper extends the research program of modeling the Schumpeterian vision of innovative development in the Arrow-Debreu theory of general equilibrium. The core of this set-up is based on modeling the two fundamental forms of economic life distinguished by Schumpeter, namely the circular flow and economic development by specific extensions of the production system being part of the Debreu private ownership economy, so that the analysis includes static as well as dynamic forms. In this context the paper aims at studying the mechanisms of Schumpeterian evolution in the conceptual apparatus of the Hurwicz’s theory of economic mechanisms. To this purpose two kinds of mechanisms of Schumpeterian innovative evolution are studied. First, price mechanisms which include prices as an element of the message space, and second, qualitative mechanisms which, in addition, guarantee that the position of a group of agents will get better off with respect to the given criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60:323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian A (1950) Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. J Polit Econ 57:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ES (2009) Schumpeter’s evolutionary economics. Anthem Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciałowicz B, Malawski A (2011) The role of banks in the Schumpeterian innovative evolution–an axiomatic set-up. In: Pyka A, Derengowski F, da Graca M (eds) Catching up, spillovers and innovations networks in a Schumpeterian perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • da Graça Moura M (2002) Metatheory as the key to understanding: Schumpeter after Shionoya. Camb J Econ 26(6):805–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day RH (2007) The mechanisms of economic evolution: completing Schumpeter’s theory. In: Hanusch H, Pyka A (eds) Elgar companion to neo-schumpeterian economics (2007). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, pp 745–753

  • Debreu G (1959) Theory of value. Viley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffie D (1988) Security markets, stochastic models. Academic Press

  • Foster J (2000) Competitive selection, self-organisation and Joseph A. Schumpeter J Evol Econ 10(3):311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (2011) Evolutionary macroeconomics: a research agenda. In: Pyka A, Derengowski F, da Graca M (eds) Catching up, spillovers and innovations networks in a Schumpeterian perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1982) The economics of industrial innovations, 2nd edn. Printer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanusch H, Pyka A (2007) Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1883–1950). In: Hanusch H, Pyka A (eds) Elgar Companion to neo-schumpeterian economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 19–26

  • Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (1993) Economics and evolution: bringing life back into economics. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2006) What are institutions? J Econ Issues 40(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2007) Meanings of methodological individualism. J Econ Methodol 14(2):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L (1960) Optimality and informational efficiency in resources allocation process. In: Arrow K, Karlin S, Suppes P (eds) Mathematical methods in the social sciences. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L, Reiter S (2006) Designing economic mechanism. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J (1982) The competitive allocation process is informationally efficient uniquely. J Econ Theory 28:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. Am Econ Rev 86:562–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipieta A (2010) The Debreu private ownership economy with complementary commodities and prices. Econ Model 27:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • März E (1991) Joseph Schumpeter: scholar, teacher and politician. Yale University Press, New Haven

  • Magill M, Quinzii M (2002) The theory of incomplete markets. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawski A (2004) Beyond Schumpeterian illusions: from general equilibrium to evolutionary economics; the paper presented at the International Schumpeter Society Meeting, Milan, 9–11 June 2004, Italy

  • Malawski A (2005) A dynamical system approach to the arrow-Debreu theory of general equilibrium. 9th World Multi-Conf Syst, Cybernet Inform, Proc 2005, Orlando, Florida, USA VII:434–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawski A (2008) Distributive justice and Schumpeterian innovative evolution – an axiomatic approach in the context of social cohesion. In: Ostasiewicz W (ed) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Quality of Life Improvement through Social Cohesion. Wrocław University of Economics, Wrocław, pp 80–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawski A, Woerter M (2006) Diversity structure of the schumpeterian evolution. an axiomatic Approach; Arbeitspapiere/Working Papers of the Swiss Institute for Business Cycle Research, No 153, Oct. 2006, Zurich

  • Malerba F (2005) Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 380–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1995) Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Camb J Econ 19:47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1997) Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Ind Corp Chang 6:83–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics (2007), H. Hanusch, A. Pyka, eds., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA

  • Schubert C (2012) Is novelty always a good thing? towards an evolutionary welfare economics. J Evol Econ 22(3):585–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1908) Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1912) Die Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot; English translations: The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1934 and A Galaxy Book, New York, Oxford University Press 1961

  • Schumpeter JA (1950) Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 3rd edn. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1964) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, McGraw-Hill, New York, London (1939), abrth edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shionoya Y (1990) Instrumentalism in Schumpeter’s economic methodology. Hist Polit Econ 22(2):187–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shionoya Y (1997) Schumpeter and the idea of social science: a methodological study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shionoya Y (2007) Schumpeterian universal social science. In: Hanusch H, Pyka A (eds) Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics (2007). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, pp 55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Shionoya Y (2015) Schumpeter and evolution: an ontological exploration. http://www.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/service/tenji/amjas/Shionoya18.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2015

  • Simon HA (1955) A behavioural model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69:99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1957) Models of man: social and rational. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1972) Theories of bounded rationality, chapter 8. In: McGuire CB, Radner R (eds) Decision and organization. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education - Grant NN111295738.

We would like to thank two anonymous referees who offered very helpful, critical comments, which allowed us to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Lipieta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lipieta, A., Malawski, A. Price versus quality competition: in search for Schumpeterian evolution mechanisms. J Evol Econ 26, 1137–1171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0470-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0470-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation