Skip to main content
Log in

Intertemporal propensity to consume

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross-sectionally estimated Engel curves tend to exhibit shapes that imply ultimately decreasing marginal propensities to consume as income rises. This suggests at first sight a tendency to slow down in private consumption. This tendency has to be reconsidered taking into account the fact that Engel curves usually shift significantly over time. We introduce the notion of “intertemporal propensity to consume” to shed more light on the drivers and patterns of the evolution of Engel curves. Using this notion, we are able to identify and measure the direction of the expansion path of consumption as time goes by, while controlling for household characteristics and price levels. Using German household data, we show that, over time, the intertemporal propensity to consume systematically offsets the consumption paths implied by the marginal propensity to consume that is derived cross-sectionally at one point in time. We claim that this difference between marginal and intertemporal propensity to consume should be ascribed to variations in the socioeconomic structures that occur over time and that may be linked both to the supply side (innovation and technical change) and the demand side (learning dynamics of consumers). We also show that changes in relative prices play a minor role in the evolution of Engel curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here we use the term marginal propensity to consume as referring to particular categories of goods and services, unlike the macroeconomic literature in which this term is usually associated with aggregate consumption.

  2. The MPC so defined differs from the notion of income elasticity only in the sense that, to calculate the income elasticity of expenditure for a given level of income, both expenditure and income have to be taken in logarithms.

  3. The shapes of cross-sectional Engel curves may be also sensitive to household characteristics, if these influence expenditure on a given category and if household characteristic change with the level of total expenditure. We estimate cross-sectional Engel curves for subgroups selected on the basis of household size, occupation of the head of the household, and age of the head of the household. The Engel curves estimated with these samples largely confirm the shapes of the Engel curves derived by pooling the households. This allows us to use the pooled data for our intertemporal analysis in the next section that requires a large cross-sectional sample size. Results are available upon request.

  4. Results for the other member groups, which are not qualitatively different from the two-four members group, are available upon request.

References

  • Aversi R, Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Meacci M, Olivetti C (1999) Demand dynamics with socially evolving preferences. Ind. Corp. Chang 8(2):353–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks J, Blundell R, Lewbel A (1997) Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barigozzi M, Moneta A (2015) Identifying the independent sources of consumption variation. Journal of Applied Econometrics. doi:10.1002/jae.2441

  • Blundell R, Chen X, Kristensen D (2007) Semi–non–parametric IV estimation of shape-invariant Engel curves. Econometrica 75(6):1613–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvet L, Comon E (2003) Behavioral heterogeneity and the income effect. Rev Econ Stat 85(3):653– 669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai A, Moneta A (2014) Escaping satiation dynamics: Some evidence from british household data. J Econ Stat (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik) 234(2-3):299–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A, Muellbauer J (1980) An almost ideal demand system. Am Econ Rev 70:312–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel E (1857) Die Productions- und Consumtionsverhältnisse des Königreichs Sachsen. Zeitschrift des Statistischen Büreaus des Königlich Sächischen Ministeriums des Innern (8-9)

  • Engel J, Kneip A (1996) Recent approaches to estimating Engel curves. J Econ 63(2):187–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J (1993) Local linear regression smoothers and their minimax efficiency. Ann Stat 21:196–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Gijbels I (1992) Variable bandwidth and local linear regression smoothers. Ann Stat 20:2008–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Gijbels I (2003) Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications. Chapam & HallCRC

  • Fleck M, Papastefanou G (2006) Einkommens-und Verbrauchsstichprobe 1998: Design und Methodik sowie Veränderungen gegenüber den Vorgängererhebungen. ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht 2006(1)

  • Foellmi R, Zweimüller J (2008) Structural change, Engel’s consumption cycles and kaldor’s facts of economic growth. J Monet Econ 55(7):1317–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser T, Müller H (1979) Kernel estimation of regression functions. In: Gasser T., Rosenblatt M. (eds) Smoothing Techniques for Curve Estimation. Springer, pp 23–68

  • Härdle W (1990) Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press

  • Härdle W, Jerison M (1991) Cross section Engel curves over time. Recherches Économiques de Louvain/Louvain Economic Review, 391–431

  • Hirsch F (1978) Social limits to growth. Taylor & Francis Group

  • Lavoie M (1994) A post Keynesian approach to consumer choice. J Post Keynesian Econ 16(4):539–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewbel A (2007) Modeling heterogeneity. In: Blundell R., Newey W. K., Persson T. (eds) Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge University Press

  • Manig C, Moneta A (2014) More or better? Measuring quality versus quantity in food consumption. J Bioecon 16(2):155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta A, Chai A (2014) The evolution of Engel curves and its implications for structural change theory. Camb J Econ 38(4):895–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaraya E (1964) On estimating regression. Theory Probab Appl 9(1):141–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Consoli D (2010) An evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior. J Evol Econ 20(5):665–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti L (1981) Structural change and economic growth: A theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti P (2001) Variety, growth and demand. J Evol Econ 11(1):119–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2014) Einkommens- und verbrauchsstichprobe. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Meta/abisz/EinkommensVerbrauchsstichprobee.html (Access: 14.07.2014)

  • Valente M (2012) Evolutionary demand: a model for boundedly rational consumers. J Evol Econ 22(5):1029–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson G (1964) Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A 26 (4), 359–372

  • Witt U (2001) Learning to consume–A theory of wants and the growth of demand. J Evol Econ 11(1):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Andreas Chai, Ulrich Witt and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. We also thank André Lorentz and the audience of the International Schumpeter Society Conference held in Jena in 2014 for their comments. Finally, we thank the U.K. Central Statistical Office for making available the U.K. Family Expenditure Survey and the Expenditure and Food Survey data through the Economic and Social Data Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Moneta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruns, S.B., Moneta, A. Intertemporal propensity to consume. J Evol Econ 27, 295–314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0460-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0460-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation