Abstract
Complexity science provides a general mathematical basis for evolutionary thinking. It makes us face the inherent, irreducible nature of uncertainty and the limits to knowledge and prediction. Complex, evolutionary systems work on the basis of on-going, continuous internal processes of exploration, experimentation and innovation at their underlying levels. This is acted upon by the level above, leading to a selection process on the lower levels and a probing of the stability of the level above. This could either be an organizational level above, or the potential market place. Models aimed at predicting system behaviour therefore consist of assumptions of constraints on the micro-level – and because of inertia or conformity may be approximately true for some unspecified time. However, systems without strong mechanisms of repression and conformity will evolve, innovate and change, creating new emergent structures, capabilities and characteristics. Systems with no individual freedom at their lower levels will have predictable behaviour in the short term – but will not survive in the long term. Creative, innovative, evolving systems, on the other hand, will more probably survive over longer times, but will not have predictable characteristics or behaviour. These minimal mechanisms are all that are required to explain (though not predict) the co-evolutionary processes occurring in markets, organizations, and indeed in emergent, evolutionary communities of practice. Some examples will be presented briefly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen PM (1982) Evolution, modelling and design in a complex world. Environ Plan B 9:95–111
Allen PM (1988) Dynamic models of evolving systems. Syst Dyn Rev 4(1–2):109–130
Allen PM (1990) Why the future is not what it was. Futures 22:554–570
Allen PM (1994) Evolutionary complex systems: models of technology change. In: Leydesdorff L, van den Besselaar P (eds) Chaos and economic theory. Pinter, London. ISBN 1 85567 198 0 (hb) 1 85567 202 2 (pb)
Allen PM (2001) A complex systems approach to learning, adaptive networks. Int J Innov Manag 5(2):149–180. ISSN 1363–9196
Allen PM, McGlade JM (1987) Evolutionary drive: the effect of microscopic diversity, error making & noise. Found Phys 17(7):723–728
Allen P, Strathern M (2004) Evolution, emergence and learning in complex systems. Emergence 5(4):8–33
Allen PM, Strathern M, Baldwin JS (2007a) Complexity and the limits of learning. J Evol Econ 17:401–431
Allen PM, Strathern M, Baldwin JS (2007b) Evolutionary drive: new understanding of change in socio-economic systems. Emergence, Complexity and Organization 8(2):2–19
Foster R, Kaplan S (2001) Creative destruction. Doubleday, New York
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness and adaptive intelligence. Strat Manag J 27:201–214
McCarthy I (1995) Manufacturing classifications: lessons from organisational systematics and biological taxonomy. J Manuf Technol Manag- Integr Manuf Syst 6(6):37–49. ISSN: 1741-038X
McCarthy I, Leseure M, Ridgeway K, Fieller N (1997) Building a manufacturing Cladogram. Int J Technol Manag 13(3):2269–2296. ISSN (Online): 1741-5276 - ISSN (Print): 0267-5730
McKelvey B (1982) Organizational Systematics – Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London. ISBN 0520042255
McKelvey B (1994) Evolution and organizational science. In: Baum J, Singh J (eds) Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press, pp 314–326. ISBN13: 9780195085846, ISBN10: 0195085841
Metcalfe JS (1998) Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, London. ISBN: 0415158680
Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Ormerod P (2005) Why most things fail. Faber and Faber, London
Rivkin J (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Manag Sci 46(6):824–844
Rivkin J, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Manag Sci 49(3):290–311
Rivkin J, Siggelkow N (2006) Organizing to strategize in the face of interactions: preventing premature lock-in. Long Range Planning 39:591–614
Rivkin J, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: implications for exploration. Manag Sci 53(7):1068–1085
Rose-Anderssen C, Ridgway K, Baldwin J, Allen P, Varga L, Strathern M (2008a) The evolution of commercial aerospace supply chains and the facilitation of innovation. Int J Electron Cust Relationship Manag 2(1):307–327
Rose-Anderssen C, Ridgway K, Baldwin J, Allen P, Varga L, Strathern M (2008b) Creativity and innovation management 17(4):304–318
Schumpeter J (1962) Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 3rd edn. Harper Torchbooks, New York
Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ Sci 16:101–122
Silverberg G, Verspagen B (1994) Collective learning, innovation and growth in a boundedly rational, evolutionary world. J Evol Econ 4(3):207–226
Veblen T (1898) Why is economics not an evolutionary science. Q J Econ:12
Acknowledgments
Some of the work described in this paper was supported by the EPSRC Research Grant EP/G059969/1(Complex Adaptive Systems, Cognitive Agents and Distributed Energy (CASCADE))