Skip to main content
Log in

Walras and Darwin: an odd couple?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

General equilibrium theory and the evolutionary branches of economics and game theory take rather opposite positions in the spectrum covered by the economic science. However, we reveal and explore analogies between Darwinian dynamics and Walrasian tâtonnement processes for pure exchange economies, as well as further analogies implied by these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow KJ, Debreu G. (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22: 265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Hurwicz, L (1958) On the stability of the competitive equilibrium. I. Econometrica 26:522–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Hurwicz, L (1960) Some remarks on the equilibria of economic systems. Econometrica 28: 640–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Block, HD, Hurwicz, L (1959) On the stability of the competitive equilibrium. II. Econometrica 27: 82–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger U, Hofbauer J (1998). The Nash dynamics. University of Vienna (mimeo)

  • Bomze IM, (1986). Noncooperative two-person games in biology: a classification. Int. J. Game Theory 15: 31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner T (1999) Modelling Learning in Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GW (1951) Iterative solutions of games by fictitious play. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation, Wiley, New York, pp. 374–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GW, von Neumann, J (1950) Solutions of games by differential equations. Ann Math Stud 24: 73–79. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford V (1974) Learning the optimal strategy in a zero-sum game. Econometrica 42: 885–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford V (1985) Learning behavior and mixed-strategy Nash equilibria. J. Econ Behav Organ 6:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection. J Murray, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1974) Excess demand functions. J. Math Econ 1: 15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman D (1991) Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica 59: 637–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Levine DK (1998) The Theory of Learning in Games. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale D (1960) A note on revealed preference. Economica 27: 348–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunersdorfer A , Hofbauer J (1995) Fictitious play, Shapley polygons and the replicator equation. Games Econom Behav 11: 279–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn F (1982) Stability. In: Arrow KJ, Intriligator MD (eds) Handbook of mathematical economy, vol II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 745–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh J (1975) Game theory and evolution. Adv. Appl Probab 7: 8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein P, R Selten, 1994, Game theory and evolutionary biology. In: Aumann RJ and Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory 2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Harker PT, JS Pang (1990) Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: a survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math Program 48: 161–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks JR (1939) Value and capital. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand W (1994) Market demand. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (1993) The Mecca of Alfred Marshall. Econ J 103: 406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J (1981) On the occurrence of limit cycles in the Volterra–Lotka equation. Nonlinear Anal 5: 1003–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J (1995) Stability for the best response dynamics. University of Vienna (mimeo)

  • Hofbauer J (2000) From Nash and Brown to Maynard Smith: equilibria, dynamics, and ESS. Selection 1: 81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1988) The theory of evolution and dynamical systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1998) Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker HS (1950) Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica 17: 159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L, Uzawa H (1971) On the integrability of demand functions. In: Chipman JS, Hurwicz L, Richter MK, Sonnenschein HF (eds.) Preferences, utility and demand. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel G (1993) The emergence of biomathematics and the case of population dynamics—a revival of mechanical reductionism and Darwinism. Sci. Context 6: 469–509

    Google Scholar 

  • John R (1996) Demand-supply systems, variational inequalities, and (generalized) monotone functions, Discussion paper A-530, SFB 303, Bonn University, Germany

  • John R (2000) A first order characterization of generalized monotonicity. Math Program 88: 147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joosten R (1996) Deterministic evolutionary dynamics: a unifying approach. J Evol Econ 6: 313–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosten R, Talman AJJ (1998) A globally convergent price adjustment process for exchange economies. J Math Econ 29: 15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom R, Mas-Colell A, Sonnenschein H (1976) The demand theory of the weak axiom of revealed preference. Econometrica 44: 971–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1961) Evolution and the theory of games. J Theor Biol 1: 382–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka AJ (1924) Elements of mathematical biology (transl: 1956). Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel R (1974) On the characterization of aggregate excess demand. J Econ Theory 7: 348–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui A (1992) Best-response dynamics and socially stable strategies. J Econ Theory 57: 343–362 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard SJ (1982) Evolution and the theory of games Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Price GA (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246: 15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie LW (1960a) Stability of equilibrium and the value of positive excess demand. Econometrica 28: 606–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie LW (1960b) Matrices with dominant diagonal and economic theory. In: Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Suppes P (eds) Mathematical methods in the social sciences (1959). Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosak JL (1944) General equilibrium theory in international trade. Principia, Bloomington, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachbar JH (1990) Evolutionary selection dynamics in games: convergence and limit properties. Int J Game Theory 19: 59–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash J (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 36: 48–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi T (1962) The stability of a competitive economy: a survey article. Econometrica 30: 635–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann J von, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikaidô H (1959) Stability of equilibrium by the Brown-von Neumann differential equation. Econometrica 27: 654–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perko L (1991) Differential equations and dynamical systems Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters H, P Wakker (1994) WARP does not imply SARP for more than two commodities. J Econ Theory 62: 152–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J (1951) An iterative method of solving a game. Ann Math 54: 296–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenmüller J (1971) Über die Periodizitä tseigenschaften spieltheoretischer Lernprozesse. Z. Warscheinlichkeitstheor Verw Geb 17: 259–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser JB (1992) The dialogue between the economic and the ecologic theories of evolution. J Econ Behav Organ 17: 195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumer behavior. Economica 5: 61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1941) The stability of equilibrium: comparative statics and dynamics. Econometrica 9: 97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1947) Foundations of economic analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf H (1960) Some examples of the global instability of competitive equilibrium. Int Econ Rev 1: 157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein H (1972) Market excess demand functions. Econometrica 40: 549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein H (1973) Do Walras’ identity and continuity characterize community excess demand functions? J Econ Theory 6: 345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, LB Jonker (1978) Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics. Math Biosci 40: 145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa H (1961) The stability of dynamic processes. Econometrica 29: 617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme ECC (1991) Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra V (1931) Leçons sur la Théorie Mathématique de la Lutte pour la Vie Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France

  • Wald A (1936) Über einige Gleichungssysteme der mathematischen Ökono-mie. Z. Nationalökon 7: 637–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walras L (1874) Élements d’Économie Politique Pure. Corbaz, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinoud Joosten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joosten, R. Walras and Darwin: an odd couple?. J Evol Econ 16, 561–573 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0037-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0037-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation