Advertisement

Metrika

, Volume 81, Issue 4, pp 465–482 | Cite as

Stochastic comparisons of coherent systems

  • Jorge Navarro
Invited Review

Abstract

The study of stochastic comparisons of coherent systems with different structures is a relevant topic in reliability theory. Several results have been obtained for specific distributions. The present paper is focused on distribution-free comparisons, that is, orderings which do not depend on the component distributions. Different assumptions for the component lifetimes are considered which lead us to different comparison techniques. Thus, if the components are independent and identically distributed (IID) or exchangeable, the orderings are obtained by using signatures. If they are just ID (homogeneous components), then ordering results for distorted distributions are used. In the general case or in the case of independent (heterogeneous) components, a similar technique based on generalized distorted distributions is applied. In these cases, the ordering results may depend on the copula used to model the dependence between the component lifetimes. Some illustrative examples are included in each case.

Keywords

Coherent systems Signature Stochastic comparisons Copula Distorted distributions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for several helpful suggestions. This work is supported in part by Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad of Spain under grant MTM2016-79943-P. A preliminary version of this work was presented at the 10th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability (MMR 2017), in Grenoble, France (July 3–6, 2017).

References

  1. Barlow RE, Proschan F (1975) Statistical theory of reliability and life testing. International series in decision processes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc., New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Block HW, Dugas MR, Samaniego FJ (2007) Signature-related results on system failure rates and lifetimes. In: Nair VN (ed) Advances in statistical modeling and inference: essays in honor of Kjell A. Doksum. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kochar K, Mukerjee H, Samaniego FJ (1999) The ‘signature’ of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Nav Res Logist 46:507–523MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Marichal JL, Mathonet P, Waldhauser T (2011) On signature-based expressions of system reliability. J Multivar Anal 102:1410–1416MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Navarro J (2016) Stochastic comparisons of generalized mixtures and coherent systems. Test 25:150–169MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Navarro J, Rubio R (2011) A note on necessary and sufficient conditions for ordering properties of coherent systems with exchangeable components. Nav Res Logist 58:478–489MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Navarro J, Rubio R (2012) Comparisons of coherent systems with non-identically distributed components. J Stat Plan Inference 142:1310–1319MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Navarro J, Gomis MC (2016) Comparisons in the mean residual life order of coherent systems with identically distributed components. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 32:33–47MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Navarro J, del Águila Y (2017a) Stochastic comparisons of distorted distributions, coherent systems and mixtures. Metrika 80:627–648MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Navarro J, Durante F (2017b) Connecting copula properties with comparisons of order statistics and coherent systems with dependent components. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  11. Navarro J, Samaniego FJ, Balakrishnan N, Bhattacharya D (2008) Applications and extensions of system signatures in engineering reliability. Nav Res Logist 55:313–327MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Navarro J, Samaniego FJ, Balakrishnan N (2011) Signature-based representations for the reliability of systems with heterogeneous components. J Appl Probab 48:856–867MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Navarro J, del Águila Y, Sordo MA, Suárez-Llorens A (2013) Stochastic ordering properties for systems with dependent identically distributed components. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 29:264–278MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Navarro J, del Águila Y, Sordo MA, Suárez-Llorens A (2014) Preservation of reliability classes under the formation of coherent systems. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 30:444–454MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Navarro J, del Águila Y, Sordo MA, Suárez-Llorens A (2016) Preservation of stochastic orders under the formation of generalized distorted distributions. Applications to coherent systems. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 18:529–545MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Navarro J, Torrado N, del Águila Y (2018) Comparisons between largest order statistics from multiple-outlier models with dependence. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 20:411–433MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Rychlik T, Navarro J, Rubio R (2017) Effective procedure of verifying stochastic ordering of system lifetimes. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  18. Samaniego FJ (1985) On the IFR closure theorem. IEEE Trans Reliab TR 34:69–72CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Samaniego FJ (2007) System signatures and their applications in engineering reliability. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Samaniego FJ, Navarro J (2016) On comparing coherent systems with heterogeneous components. Adv Appl Probab 48:88–111MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (2007) Stochastic orders. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de MatemáticasUniversidad de MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations