Skip to main content
Log in

The dynamics among domestic saving, investment, and the current account balance in the USA: a long-run perspective

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use time series methods to analyse the long- and short-run dynamics and inter-relationships between government savings, private savings, investment, and the current account balance in the USA for the period 1947Q1–2017Q3. We control for the impact of the nonlinear dynamics of GDP growth over the business cycle on the evolution of these variables. A few important results stand out. The relationships among the variables are time varying as we find three structural periods: (I) 1947Q1–1984Q3, (II) 1984Q4–1999Q4, and (III) 2000Q1–2017Q3. The impact of nonlinearities in GDP growth matters in each period, but the twin deficit hypothesis is supported only in the first period. Generally, we also find no evidence to conclude that the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis holds over the full sample period. Finally, we cannot conclude that the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle with respect to private or government savings holds over the three structural periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018)

Fig. 2

Source Authors’ calculation using data from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018)

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We follow and modify the final set of equations presented in Olivei (2000).

  2. See Mann (2002) for a discussion on the sustainably of the US current account deficit and if it should matter.

  3. The discussion of the first three of these shocks is based on the discussion in McKibbin and Stoeckel (2005).

  4. For example see Penati and Dooley (1984), Dooley et al. (1987), Obstfeld (1986), Feldstein and Bachetta (1991) and Baxter and Crucini (1993). See also Tesar (1991), Coakley et al. (1998) and Apergis and Tsoumas (2009) for an extensive survey on the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle.

  5. The correlation between saving and investment has been one of the interesting themes in international economics since Feldstein and Horioka (1980). We calculated the correlation between saving and investment as a share of GDP for the three periods as follows: 0.739 (1947Q1–1984Q3), 0.714 (1984Q4–1999Q4) and 0.636 (2000Q1–2017Q3).

  6. We also conducted the Augment Dickey Fuller (ADF) tests. The conclusions were the same as the PP test.

  7. The inference drawn from the unit root tests were invariant to the inclusion or exclusion of the intercept and trend.

  8. The long run coefficients can be estimated using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) technique (proposed by Pesaran and Shin (1999) and Pesaran et al. (2001) while imposing appropriate restrictions). We recognize the importance of long run coefficients; however, this is beyond the scope of this paper, and hence, left for future research.

  9. We also ran the VECM without the CDR effect term, but the results were basically unchanged.

References

  • Altissimo F, Violante GL (2001) The nonlinear dynamics of output and unemployment in the U.S. J Appl Econom 16(4):461–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Tsoumas C (2009) A survey on the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle: What has been done and where we stand. Res Econ 63(2):64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman D (1992) Why is the US current account so large? Evidence from vector autoregressions. South Econ J 59(2):232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66(January):47–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini L, Lahiri A (2006) Twin deficits: twenty years later. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Curr Issues Econ Finance 12(7):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter M, Crucini MJ (1993) Explaining saving-investment correlations. Am Econ Rev 83(3):416–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry P, Koop G (1993) Do recessions permanently change output? J Monet Econ 31(2):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke BS (2005) The global saving glut and the U.S. current account deficit. In: Speech delivered at the Sandridge Lecture, Virginia Association of Economists, Richmond, Va., March 10

  • Bernanke BS (2007). Global imbalances: recent developments and prospects. In: Speech delivered at the Bundesbank lecture, Berlin, Germany

  • Bernheim BD (1988) Budget deficits and the balance of trade. In: Summers LH (ed) Tax policy and the economy, vol 2. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Giavazzi F (2002) Current account deficits in the euro area: The end of the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle? Brook Pap Econ Act 2:147–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buiter WH (1981) Time preference and international lending and borrowing in an overlapping generations model. J Polit Econ 89:769–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussière M, Fratzscher M, Müller G (2005) Productivity shocks, budget deficits and the current account. ECB Working Paper 509

  • Coakley J, Kulasi F (1997) Cointegration of long run saving and investment. Econ Lett 54:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakley J, Kulasi F, Smith R (1996) Current account solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Econ J 106:620–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakley J, Smith F, Smith RP (1998) The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle and capital mobility: a review. Int J Finance Econ 3:169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakley J, Fuertes A-M, Spagnolo F (2004) Is the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle history? Manch Sch 72:569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti G, Müller G (2006) Twin deficits: squaring theory, evidence and common sense. Econ Policy 48:597–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrat AF (1988) Have large deficits caused rising trade deficits? South Econ J 54:879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolado J, Jenkinson T, Sosvilla-Rivero S (1990) Cointegration and unit roots: a survey. J Econ Surv 4(3):249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley M, Frankel JA, Mathieson DJ (1987) International capital mobility: What do saving-investment correlations tell us? Int Monet Fund Staff Pap 34:503–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction representation: estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein MS, Bachetta P (1991) National saving and international investment. In: Berheim D, Shoven J (eds) National saving and economic performance. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 201–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein MS, Horioka C (1980) Domestic saving and international capital flows. Econ J 90:314–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Uma R (2006) Do current account deficit matter? Finance Dev 43(4). IMF. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2006/12/basics.htm#author. Accessed 15 Feb 2018

  • Gulley OD (1992) Are saving and investment cointegrated? Another look at the data. Econ Lett 39:55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted S (1992) The emerging U.S. current account deficit in the 1980s: a cointegration analysis. Rev Econ Stat 74:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison MM, Pigott C (1984) Budget deficits, exchange rates and the current account: theory and U.S. evidence. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Econ Rev pp 5–25

  • Jansen WJ (1996) Estimating saving-investment correlations: evidence for OECD countries based on an error correction model. J Int Money Finance 15:749–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to money demand. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsimi M, Zoega G (2016) European Integration and the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 78(6):834–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Roubini N (2008) Twin deficit or twin divergence? Fiscal policy, current account, and real exchange rate in the US. J Int Econ 74:362–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraay A, Ventura J (2000) Current accounts in debtor and creditor countries. Q J Econ 115(4):1137–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraay A, Ventura J (2003) Current accounts in the long and short run. Natl Bur Econ Res Macroecon Annu 2002(17):65–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann CL (2002) Perspectives on the U.S. Current account deficit and sustainability. J Econ Perspect 16(3):131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin W, Stoeckel A (2005) The United States current account deficit and world markets. Econ Scenar 10:2–9. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200502.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2018

  • Miller SM (1988) Are saving and investment cointegrated? Econ Lett 27:31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld M (1986) Capital mobility in the world economy: Theory and measurement. In: Carnegie-rochester conference series on public policy, vol 24(Spring) pp 55–10

  • Obstfeld M, Rogoff K (1995) The intertemporal approach to the current account. In: Grossman G, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of international economics, vol 3. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1731–1799

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivei GP (2000) The role of saving and investment in balancing the current account: some—empirical evidence from the United States. N Engl Econ Rev pp 3–14. Retrieved from https://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neer/neer2000/neer400a.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2018

  • Penati A, Dooley M (1984) Current account imbalances and capital formation in industrial countries, 1949–1981. IMF Staff Pap 31:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1999) An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strøm S (ed) Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: the Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 371–413

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econom 16(3):289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck R, Rubinfeld D (1998) Econometric models and economic forecasts, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill-Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J (1981) The current account and macroeconomic adjustment in the 1970s. Brook Pap Econ Act 12:1089–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer LN (1988) Tax policy and international competitiveness. In: Frenkel JA (ed) International aspects of fiscal policies, NBER conference report. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 349–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesar LL (1991) Saving, investment and international capital flows. J Int Econ 31:55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018) U.S. economic accounts. Retrieved on 28 July 2018 from https://www.bea.gov/

  • Ventura J (2003) Towards a theory of current accounts. World Econ 26(4):483–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anupam Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Young Cheol Jung declares that he has no conflict of interest. Adian McFarlane declares that he has no conflict of interest. Anupam Das declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McFarlane, A., Jung, Y.C. & Das, A. The dynamics among domestic saving, investment, and the current account balance in the USA: a long-run perspective. Empir Econ 58, 1659–1680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1566-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1566-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation