Empirical Economics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 1215–1235 | Cite as

Calendar effects in Latin American stock markets

  • Diego Winkelried
  • Luis A. Iberico


One of the most well-documented empirical regularities in international finance is the presence of calendar effects in historical stock returns. The literature focuses mainly on developed countries, and in general, emerging markets have not received much attention on this issue. We aim to bridge this gap by documenting the existence of significant and robust calendar effects for the main stock markets in Latin America. Upon performing an extreme bounds analysis that adjusts our estimations for model uncertainty, we find a significantly negative Monday effect, generally compensated by a significantly positive Friday effect. These effects are robust to model specification and are stable through time. Even though not as widespread, we also find evidence for a robust turn-of-the-month effect.


Monday effect Effect coding Extreme bounds analysis Latin America 


  1. Agrawal A, Tandon K (1994) Anomalies or illusions? Evidence from stock markets in eighteen countries. J Int Money Financ 13(1):83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an Empiricist’s companion. Princenton University Press, PrincentonGoogle Scholar
  3. Ariel RA (1987) A monthly effect in stock returns. J Financ Econ 18(1):161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadsby CB, Ratner M (1992) Turn-of-month and pre-holiday effects on stock returns: some international evidence. J Bank Financ 16(3):497–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang EC, Pinegar JM, Ravichandran R (1993) International evidence on the robustness of the day-of-the-week effect. J Financ Quant Anal 28(4):497–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connolly R (1989) An examination of the robustness of the weekend effect. J Financ Quant Anal 24(2):133–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cribari-Neto F, Ferrari SLP, Oliveira WASC (2005) Numerical evaluation of tests based on different heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators. J Stat Comput Simul 75(8):611–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damodaran A (1989) The weekend effect in information releases: a study of earnings and dividend announcements. Rev Financ Stud 2(4):607–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (1993) Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. De Bondt WFM, Thaler RH (1987) Further evidence on investors overreaction and stock market seasonality. J Financ 42(3):557–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dicle MF, Levendis J (2014) The day-of-the-week effect revisited: international evidence. J Econ Financ 38(3):407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster FD, Viswanathan S (1990) A theory of the interday variations in volume, variance, and trading costs in securities markets. Rev Financ Stud 3(4):593–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. French KR (1980) Stock returns and the weekend effect. J Financ Econ 8(1):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbons MR, Hess P (1981) Day of the week effects and asset returns. J Bus 54(4):579–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gultekin MN, Gultekin NB (1983) Stock market seasonality: international evidence. J Financ Econ 12(4):469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keim DB (1983) Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality: further empirical evidence. J Financ Econ 12(1):13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keim DB, Stambaugh R (1984) A further investigation of the weekend effect in stock returns. J Financ 39(3):819–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kiymaz H, Berument H (2003) The day of the week effect on stock market volatility and volume: international evidence. Rev Financ Econ 12(4):363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunkel RA, Compton WS, Beyer S (2003) The turn-of-the-month effect still lives: the international evidence. Int Rev Financ Anal 12(2):207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristjanpoller W (2012) Day of the week effect in Latin American stock markets. Econ Anal Rev 27(1):71–89Google Scholar
  21. Kristjanpoller W, Muñoz RE (2012) Analysis of day of the week effect in the main Latin American stock markets: an approximation through the stochastic dominance criterion. Estudios de Economía 39(1):5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hlavac M (2015) ExtremeBounds: Extreme Bounds Analysis in R, R package version 0.1.5.
  23. Jaffe J, Westerfield R (1985) The week-end effect in common stock returns: the international evidence. J Financ 40(2):433–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaffe J, Westerfield R (1989) Is there a monthly effect in stock market returns? Evidence from foreign countries. J Bank Financ 13(2):237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakonishok J, Levi M (1982) Weekend effects on stock returns: a note. J Financ 37(3):883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lakonishok J, Smidt S (1988) Are seasonal anomalies real? A ninety-year perspective. Rev Financ Stud 1(4):403–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leamer EE (1983) Let’s take the con out of econometrics. Am Econ Rev 73(1):31–43Google Scholar
  28. Leamer EE (1985) Sensitivity analyses would help. Am Econ Rev 75(3):308–313Google Scholar
  29. Levy T, Yagil J (2012) The week-of-the-year effect: evidence from around the globe. J Bank Financ 36(7):1963–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Long JS, Ervin LH (2000) Using heterocedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. Am Stat 54(3):217–224Google Scholar
  31. MacKinnon JG, White H (1985) Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. J Econom 29(3):305–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Porterba JM, Weisbenner SJ (2001) Capital gains tax rules, tax-loss trading, and turn-of-the-year returns. J Financ 56(1):353–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rojas E, Kristjanpoller W (2014) Calendar anomalies in the Latin American stock markets: a Bonferroni testing approach. Lecturas de Economía 81(2):91–113Google Scholar
  34. Roll R (1983) Vas ist das? The turn-of-the-year effect and the return premia of small firms. J Portf Manag 9(2):18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sala-i-Martin X (1997) I just ran two million regressions. Am Econ Rev 87(2):178–183Google Scholar
  36. Schwert GW (2003) Anomalies and market efficiency. In: Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM (eds) Handbook of the economics of finance. Elsevier, vol 1, ch 15, pp 939–974Google Scholar
  37. Sias RW, Starks LT (1995) The day-of-the-week anomaly: the role of institutional investors. Financ Anal J 51(3):58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sullivan R, Timmermann A, White H (2001) Dangers of data mining: the case of calendar effects in stock returns. J Econom 105(1):249–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thaler RH (1987) Anomalies: weekend, holiday, turn of the month, and intraday effects. J Econ Perspect 1(2):169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad del Pacífico (Lima, Perú)Lima 11Peru

Personalised recommendations