Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 959–987 | Cite as

The changing transmission mechanism of US monetary policy

  • Norhana Endut
  • James Morley
  • Pao-Lin Tien
Article

Abstract

We examine the relative importance of the interest rate, exchange rate, and bank-lending channels for the transmission mechanism of monetary policy in the United States over the past fifty years. Our analysis is based on a structural vector autoregressive model that includes bank loans and uses sign restrictions to identify monetary policy shocks. Given these identified policy shocks, we quantify the relative importance of different transmission channels via counterfactual analysis. Our results suggest a nontrivial role for the bank-lending channel at the aggregate level, but its importance has been greatly diminished since the early 1980s. Despite the timing, we find no support for a link between this change in the transmission mechanism and the concurrent reduction in output volatility associated with the Great Moderation. There is, however, some evidence of a link to the reduction in inflation volatility occurring at the same time.

References

  1. Ahmed S, Levin A, Wilson BA (2004) Recent U.S. macroeconomic stability: good policy, good practices, or good luck? Rev Econ Stat 86(3):824–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeloni I, Kashyap A, Mojon B, Terlizzese D (2003) Monetary transmission in the Euro Area: does the interest rate channel explain all? NBER working paper No. 9984Google Scholar
  3. Ashcraft A (2006) New evidence on the lending channel. J Money Credit Bank 38:751–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barigozzi M, Conti AM, Luciani M (2013) Do Euro Area countries respond asymmetrically to the common monetary policy. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 76:693–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benati L, Surico P (2009) VAR analysis and the great moderation. Am Econ Rev 99:1636–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernanke B, Blinder A (1988) Credit Money Aggreg Demand. Am Econ Rev 78:435–439Google Scholar
  7. Bernanke B, Blinder A (1992) The federal funds rate and the channels on monetary transmission. Am Econ Rev 82:901–921Google Scholar
  8. Bernanke B, Gertler M (1995) Inside the black box: the credit channel of monetary policy transmission. J Econ Perspect 9:27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernanke B, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1999) The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In: Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics, vol 1. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 1341–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boivin J, Giannoni M (2006) Has monetary policy become more effective? Rev Econ Stat 88:445–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boivin J, Kiley M, Mishkin F (2010) How has the monetary transmission mechanism evolved over time? NBER working paper No. 15879Google Scholar
  12. Brady R (2011) Consumer credit, liquidity, and the transmission mechanism of monetary policy. Econ Inq 49:246–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Canova F, De Nicoló G (2002) Monetary disturbances matter for business fluctuations in the G-7. J Monet Econ 49:1131–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canova F, Gambetti L (2009) Structural changes in the U.S. economy: is there a role for monetary policy? J Econ Dyn Control 33:477–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canova F, Paustian M (2010) Measurement with some theory: a new approach to evaluate business cycle models. Barcelona economics working paper series working paper No. 511Google Scholar
  16. Chen S (2004) Dynamic Cash Flow Effects on Investment. Dissertation, Washington University in St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  17. Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M (1995) Liquidity effects, monetary policy and the business cycle. J Money Credit Bank 27:1113–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans C (1999) Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what end? In: Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics, vol 1. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 65–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dave C, Dressler SJ, Zhang L (2009) The bank lending channel: a FAVAR analysis. Villanova school of business economics working paper No. 4Google Scholar
  20. Dave C, Dressler SJ, Zhang L (2013) The bank lending channel: a FAVAR analysis. J Money Credit Bank 45:1705–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Den Haan WJ, Sumner SW, Yamashiro GM (2007) Bank loan portfolios and the monetary transmission mechanism. J Monet Econ 54:904–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eichenbaum M, Evans C (1995) Some empirical evidence on the effects of shocks to monetary policy on exchange rate. Q J Econ 110:975–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fagan G, Henry J, Mestre R (2005) An area-wide model for the Euro Area. Econ Model 22:39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faust J (1998) The robustness of identified VAR conclusions about money. Carnegie Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 49:207–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fazzari S, Hubbard GR, Petersen BC (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brook Papers Econ Act 1988:141–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fernández-Villaverde J, Rubio-Ramírez JF, Sargent T, Watson MW (2007) ABCs (and Ds) of understanding VARs. Am Econ Rev 97:1021–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forni M, Gambetti L (2010) The dynamic effects of monetary policy: a structural factor model approach. J Monet Econ 57:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fry R, Pagan A (2011) Sign restrictions in structural vector autoregressions: a critical review. J Econ Lit 49:938–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1993) The cyclical behavior of short-term business lending implications for financial propagation mechanism. Eur Econ Rev 37:623–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giannone D, Lenza M, Reichlin L (2008) Explaining the great moderation: it is not the shocks. J Eur Econ Assoc 6:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gorton G (2009) Slapped in the face by the invisible hand: banking and the panic of 2007. Prepared for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s 2009 financial markets conference: financial innovation and crisis, May 11–13, 2009Google Scholar
  32. Kashyap A, Stein J (1994) Monetary policy and bank lending. In: Mankiw NG (ed) Monetary policy. University of Chicago Press for NBER, Chicago, pp 221–256Google Scholar
  33. Kashyap A, Stein J (1995) The impact of monetary policy on bank balance sheets. Carnegie Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 42:151–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kashyap A, Stein J (2000) What do a million observations on banks say about the transmission of monetary policy? Am Econ Rev 90:407–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kashyap A, Stein J, Wilcox D (1993) Monetary policy and credit conditions: evidence from the composition of external finance. Am Econ Rev 83:78–98Google Scholar
  36. Kim S (1999) Do monetary policy shocks matter in the G-7 countries? Using common identifying assumptions about monetary policy across countries. J Int Econ 48:387–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim CJ, Morley J, Piger J (2008) Bayesian counterfactual analysis of the sources of the great moderation. J Appl Econ 23:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim CJ, Nelson CR (1999) Has the U.S. economy become more stable? A Bayesian approach based on a Markov-switching model of the business cycle. Rev Econ Stat 81:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim CJ, Nelson CR, Piger J (2004) The less volatile U.S. economy: a Bayesian investigation of timing, breadth, and potential explanations. J Bus Econ Stat 22:80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kishan RP, Opiela TP (2000) Bank size, bank capital, and the bank lending channel. J Money Credit Bank 32:121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leeper EM, Sims CA, Zha T (1996) What does monetary policy do? Brook Papers Econ Act 1996:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu Y, Morley J (2014) Structural evolution of the postwar U.S. economy. J Econ Dyn Control 42:50–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lubik TA, Schorfheide F (2004) Testing for indeterminacy: an application to U.S. monetary policy. Am Econ Rev 94:190–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ludvigson S, Steindel C, Lettau M (2002) Monetary policy transmission through the consumption-wealth channel. FRBNY Econ Policy Rev 8:117–133Google Scholar
  45. McConnell M, Perez-Quiros G (2000) Output fluctuations in the United States: what has changed since the early 1980s? Am Econ Rev 90:1464–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mishkin F (1995) Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism. J Econ Perspect 9:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mishkin F (2007) The economics of money, banking, and financial markets, 8th edition. Pearson Addison Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. Niemira MP, Klein PA (1994) Forecasting financial and economic cycles. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Peersman G (2004) The transmission of monetary policy in the Euro Area: are the effects different across countries? Oxf Bull Econ Stat 66:285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perez S (1998) Causal ordering and ‘The Bank Lending Channel’. J Appl Econ 13:613–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramey VA (1993) How important is the credit channel in the transmission of monetary policy? Carnegie Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 39:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reifschneider D, Tetlow R, Williams J (1999) Aggregate disturbances, monetary policy, and the macroeconomy: the FRB/US perspective. Fed Reserve Bull Board Gov Fed Reserve Syst 1999:1–19Google Scholar
  53. Romer CD, Romer DH (1990) New evidence on the monetary transmission mechanism. Brook Papers Econ Act 1990:149–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stock JH, Watson MW (2002) Has the business cycle changed and why? In: Gertler M, Rogoff K (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual 2002, vol 17. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 159–218Google Scholar
  55. Taylor JB (1995) The monetary transmission mechanism: an empirical framework. J Econ Perspect 9:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uhlig H (2005) What are the effects of monetary policy on output? Results from an agnostic identification procedure. J Monet Econ 52:381–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bank Negara MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Bureau of Economic AnalysisWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations