Abstract
The research mainly focused on the forming limit curves (FLC) of the 6061 Al alloy subjected to heat treatments with various (1 mm, 1.6 mm, 2 mm, and 2.5 mm) sheet metal thicknesses. Five peculiar heat treatments, including natural aging temper (T4) and highest-strength (T6) temper, were devised to study the influence of heat treatments on the formability of 6061 Al alloy sheets. Tensile tests were executed to determine the plastic behavior of the alloy under specific heat treatments. Laser marked FLC specimens were deep-drawn with the proposed spring-attached Nakajima deep drawing test setup. A finite element model (FEM) of the deep drawing experiment was constructed to investigate the nucleation and growth mechanism of the voids. The developed model was compared and verified with the experimental FLC, fracture locations, and dome height. The FEM results were differed from the experimental FLC by less than 5% considering all heat treatments and sheet thicknesses. The results declared that sheet metal thickness has a positive effect on the effective strain up to failure. On the other hand, the duration of artificial aging time reduced effective strain to failure controlled by nucleation and growth of voids.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable
Code availability
Not applicable
References
Wang N, Zhou Z, Lu G (2011) Microstructural evolution of 6061 alloy during ısothermal heat treatment. J Mater Sci Technol 27:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60018-2
Benedyk JC (2010) 3 - Aluminum alloys for lightweight automotive structures. Woodhead Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845697822.1.79
Demir H, Gündüz S (2009) The effects of aging on machinability of 6061 aluminium alloy. Mater Des 30:1480–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.08.007
ASM Handbook Committe C (1991) ASM Metals Handbook Volume 4, 10 th Edit. ASM International
Braun R (2010) On the stress corrosion cracking behaviour of 6XXX series aluminium alloys. Int J Mater Res 101:657–668. https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110314
Buha J, Lumley RN, Crosky AG (2006) Microstructural development and mechanical properties of interrupted aged Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 37:3119–3130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0192-x
Buha J, Lumley RN, Crosky AG, Hono K (2007) Secondary precipitation in an Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloy. Acta Mater 55:3015–3024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.006
Marioara CD, Nordmark H, Andersen SJ, Holmestad R (2006) Post-β″ phases and their influence on microstructure and hardness in 6xxx Al-Mg-Si alloys. J Mater Sci 41:471–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2470-1
Yassar RS, Field DP, Weiland H (2005) Transmission electron microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry studies on the precipitation sequence in an Al-Mg-Si alloy: AA6022. J Mater Res 20:2705–2711. https://doi.org/10.1557/Jmr.2005.0330
Pogatscher S, Antrekowitsch H, Ebner T, Leoben M (2012) The role of co-clusters in the artificial aging of AA 6061 and AA 6060. 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48179-1_70
Dutta I, Allen SM (1991) A calorimetric study of precipitation in aluminum alloy 6061. J Mater Sci Lett 10:323–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00719697
Edwards GA, Stiller K, Dunlop GL, Couper MJ (1998) The precipitation sequence in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater 46:3893–3904. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00059-7
Massardier V, Epicier T, Merle P (2000) Correlation between the microstructural evolution of A 6061 aluminium alloy and the evolution of its thermoelectric power. Acta Mater 48:2911–2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00085-9
Ozturk F, Sisman A, Toros S, Kilic S, Picu RC (2010) Influence of aging treatment on mechanical properties of 6061 aluminum alloy. Mater Des 31:972–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.017
Giuliano G, Bellini C, Sorrentino L, Turchetta S (2018) Forming process analysis of an AA6060 aluminum vessel. Frat ed Integrita Strutt 12:164–172. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.45.14
Keeler SP, Backofen WA (1963) Plastic instability and fracture in sheet stretched over rigid punches. ASM Trans Q 56:25–48
Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. Soc Automot Eng 380–387
El-Domiaty AA, Shabara MAN, Al-Ansary MD (1996) Determination of stretch-bendability of sheet metals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 12:207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351200
ISO (2006) ISO 12004-2:2008 Metallic materials-sheet and strip-determination of plastic strain ratio. BSI Stand Publ 3:10
Mohammed B, Park T, Pourboghrat F, Hu J, Esmaeilpour R, Abu-Farha F (2018) Multiscale crystal plasticity modeling of multiphase advanced high strength steel. Int J Solids Struct 151:57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.007
Mohammed B, Park T, Kim H, Pourboghrat F, Esmaeilpour R (2018) The forming limit curve for multiphase advanced high strength steels based on crystal plasticity finite element modeling. Mater Sci Eng A 725:250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.04.029
Panich S, Barlat F, Uthaisangsuk V, Suranuntchai S, Jirathearanat S (2013) Experimental and theoretical formability analysis using strain and stress based forming limit diagram for advanced high strength steels. Mater Des 51:756–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.080
Bong HJ, Barlat F, Lee M-G, Ahn DC (2012) The forming limit diagram of ferritic stainless steel sheets: experiments and modeling. Int J Mech Sci 64:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.08.009
Saxena KK, Das IM, Mukhopadhyay J (2015) Evaluation of bending limit curves of aluminium alloy AA6014-T4 and dual phase steel DP600 at ambient temperature. Int J Mater Form 10:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1271-6
Paul SK (2015) Path independent limiting criteria in sheet metal forming. J Manuf Process 20:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.025
Yang TS (2007) The strain path and forming limit analysis of the lubricated sheet metal forming process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.08.019
Assempour A, Hashemi R, Abrinia K, Ganjiani M, Masoumi E (2009) A methodology for prediction of forming limit stress diagrams considering the strain path effect. Comput Mater Sci 45:195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.025
Uppaluri R, Venkata Reddy N, Dixit PM (2011) An analytical approach for the prediction of forming limit curves subjected to combined strain paths. Int J Mech Sci 53:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.02.006
Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2011) Investigation on the strain-path dependency of stress-based forming limit curves. Int J Mater Form 4:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0989-4
Ma B, Diao K, Wu X, Li X, Wan M, Cai Z (2016) The effect of the through-thickness normal stress on sheet formability. J Manuf Process 21:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.12.006
Tseng HC, Hung C, Huang CC (2010) An analysis of the formability of aluminum/copper clad metals with different thicknesses by the finite element method and experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2446-4
Dilmec M, Halkaci HS, Ozturk F (2013) Effects of sheet thickness and anisotropy on forming limit curves of AA2024-T4. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2689–2700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4684-0
Dehghani F, Salimi M (2016) Analytical and experimental analysis of the formability of copper-stainless-steel 304L clad metal sheets in deep drawing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:163–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7359-9
Mahabunphachai S, Koç M (2010) Investigations on forming of aluminum 5052 and 6061 sheet alloys at warm temperatures. Mater Des 31:2422–2434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.053
Wang L, Strangwood M, Balint D, Lin J, Dean TA (2011) Formability and failure mechanisms of AA2024 under hot forming conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 528:2648–2656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.084
Wang L, Lee TC (2006) The effect of yield criteria on the forming limit curve prediction and the deep drawing process simulation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:988–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.050
Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2012) Influence of out-of-plane compression stress on limit strains in sheet metals. Int J Mater Form 5:213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-011-1044-9
Hashemi R, Abrinia K (2014) Analysis of the extended stress-based forming limit curve considering the effects of strain path and through-thickness normal stress. Mater Des 54:670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.023
Assempour A, Nejadkhaki HK, Hashemi R (2010) Forming limit diagrams with the existence of through-thickness normal stress. Comput Mater Sci 48:504–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.02.013
Dhara S, Basak S, Panda SK, Hazra S, Shollock B, Dashwood R (2016) Formability analysis of pre-strained AA5754-O sheet metal using Yld96 plasticity theory: role of amount and direction of uni-axial pre-strain. J Manuf Process 24:270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.09.014
Zhang L, Lin J, Min J, Ye Y, Kang L (2016) Formability evaluation of sheet metals based on global strain distribution. J Mater Eng Perform 25:2296–2306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2054-z
Prasad KS, Panda SK, Kar SK, Murty SVSN, Sharma SC (2018) Prediction of fracture and deep drawing behavior of solution treated Inconel-718 sheets: numerical modeling and experimental validation. Mater Sci Eng A 733:393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.007
Atkins AG (1996) Fracture in forming. J Mater Process Technol 56:609–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(95)01875-1
Isik K, Silva MB, Tekkaya AE, Martins PAF (2014) Formability limits by fracture in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 214:1557–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.026
Lumelskyj D, Rojek J, Tkocz M (2018) Detection of strain localization in numerical simulation of sheet metal forming. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:490–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.08.004
Amaral R, Teixeira P, Azinpour E, et al (2016) Evaluation of ductile failure models in sheet metal forming. MATEC Web Conf 80:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20168003004
Li J, Li S, Xie Z, Wang W (2015) Numerical simulation of incremental sheet forming based on GTN damage model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:2053–2065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7333-6
Kami A, Dariani BM, Sadough Vanini A, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2014) Numerical determination of the forming limit curves of anisotropic sheet metals using GTN damage model. J Mater Process Technol 216:472–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.017
Nguyen HH, Nguyen TN, Vu HC (2018) Ductile fracture prediction and forming assessment of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Fract 209:143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-017-0249-4
Haltom SS, Kyriakides S, Ravi-Chandar K (2013) Ductile failure under combined shear and tension. Int J Solids Struct 50:1507–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.009
Sari Sarraf I, Green DE, Vasilescu DM, Song Y (2018) Numerical analysis of damage evolution and formability of DP600 sheet with an extended Rousselier damage model. Int J Solids Struct 134:70–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.030
Jenab A, Green DE, Alpas AT, Golovashchenko SF (2018) Experimental and numerical analyses of formability improvement of AA5182-O sheet during electro-hydraulic forming. J Mater Process Technol 255:914–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.12.037
Banhart J, Chang CST, Liang Z, Wanderka N, Lay MDH, Hill AJ (2010) Natural aging in Al-Mg-Si alloys—a process of unexpected complexity. Adv Eng Mater 12:559–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201000041
Mohammadtaheri M (2012) A new metallographic technique for revealing grain boundaries in aluminum alloys. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 1:224–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-012-0033-9
ASTM (2009) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16AE01
Yildiz RA, Yilmaz S (2020) Stress–strain properties of artificially aged 6061 Al alloy: experiments and modeling. J Mater Eng Perform 29:5764–5775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05080-6
Barnwal VK, Raghavan R, Tewari A, Narasimhan K, Mishra SK (2017) Effect of microstructure and texture on forming behaviour of AA-6061 aluminium alloy sheet. Mater Sci Eng A 679:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.027
Barnwal VK, Tewari A, Narasimhan K, Mishra SK (2016) Effect of plastic anisotropy on forming behavior of AA-6061 aluminum alloy sheet. J Strain Anal Eng Des 51:507–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324716655727
ASTM (2010) Standard test method for plastic strain ratio ‘r’ for sheet metal 1. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0517-00R10.2
ASTM (2014) Standard test method for determining forming limit curves. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E2218-15
Yildiz RA, Yilmaz S (2017) The verification of strains obtained by grid measurements using digital image processing for sheet metal formability. J Strain Anal Eng Des 52:506–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324717734669
Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3443401
Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fract 17:389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036191
Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X
Zhao PJ, Chen ZH, Dong CF (2016) Failure analysis based on microvoids damage model for DP600 steel on in-situ tensile tests. Eng Fract Mech 154:152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.11.017
Chu CC, Needleman A (1980) Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. J Eng Mater Technol 102:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3224807
Yildiz RA (2019) Investigation of the effect of heat treatments on the formability of the 6061 Al alloy. Istanbul Technical University
Yildiz RA, Yilmaz S (2020) European Journal of Mechanics/A Solids Experimental Investigation of GTN model parameters of 6061 Al alloy. Eur J Mech/A Solids 83:104040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104040
He M, Li F, Wang Z (2011) Forming limit stress diagram prediction of aluminum alloy 5052 based on GTN model parameters determined by in situ tensile test. Chin J Aeronaut 24:378–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60045-9
Nahshon K, Hutchinson JW (2008) Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure. Eur J Mech - A/Solids 27:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.002
Xue L (2008) Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials. Eng Fract Mech 75:3343–3366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.022
Jackiewicz J (2011) Use of a modified Gurson model approach for the simulation of ductile fracture by growth and coalescence of microvoids under low, medium and high stress triaxiality loadings. Eng Fract Mech 78:487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.027
Sen H, Yilmaz S, Yildiz RA (2020) Springback behavior of DP600 steel: an implicit finite element simulation. J Eng Res 8:252–264
Wang C, Ma R, Zhao J, Zhao J (2017) Calculation method and experimental study of coulomb friction coefficient in sheet metal forming. J Manuf Process 27:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.02.016
Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2008) Algorithms and strategies for treatment of large deformation frictional contact in the numerical simulation of deep drawing process. Arch Comput Methods Eng 15:113–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-008-9018-x
Duncan JL, Shabel BS, Filho JG (2010) A tensile strip test for evaluating friction in sheet metal forming. SAE Tech Pap Ser 1. https://doi.org/10.4271/780391
Luo M, Wierzbicki T (2010) Numerical failure analysis of a stretch-bending test on dual-phase steel sheets using a phenomenological fracture model. Int J Solids Struct 47:3084–3102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.07.010
Ramazani A, Abbasi M, Prahl U, Bleck W (2012) Failure analysis of DP600 steel during the cross-die test. Comput Mater Sci 64:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.01.031
Keeler S, Brazier WG (1975) Relationship between laboratory material characterization and press-shop formability. In: Proceedings of the Micro alloying Conference. pp 21–32
Materials availability
Not applicable
Funding
This study was funded by Istanbul Technical University (Project Number: 38489).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that the descriptions are accurate and agreed upon by all authors. The roles of all authors listed below:
Rasid Ahmed YILDIZ: Methodology, Software, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – Original Draft,
Safak YILMAZ: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yildiz, R.A., Yilmaz, S. Influence of heat treatments on the formability of the 6061 Al alloy sheets: experiments and GTN damage model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113, 2277–2299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06792-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06792-2