Laser cladding of Stellite-6 with a coaxial nozzle via modeling and systematic experimental investigations

Abstract

In this paper, an experimental and simulation analysis is undertaken on laser cladding of Stellite-6 on mild steel and HY80 substrates. A cladding system equipped with a coaxial powder nozzle was used to identify process parameters which would produce both favorable single-track and single-layer clads first on mild steel without the need to identify different process parameters on a per-track basis. Using the parameters from mild steel substrate cladding, a minimal amount of adjustment was shown to provide process parameters to clad Stellite-6 on HY80. Modeling of single-track clads of Stellite-6 on mild steel was performed to gain additional insight into the cladding process and was validated against two single-track conditions. It was shown that a significant amount of variability can exist in the clad geometry depending on the process parameters chosen; thus, the model provides an average portrayal of the process. Finally, based on parameter tuning during the process, cladding was found to be near-optimal when the laser beam diameter was approximately the same diameter as the powder waist diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

References

  1. 1.

    Zhou X, De Hosson JTM (1991) Spinel/metal interfaces in laser coated steels: a transmission electron microscopy study. Acta Metall Mater 39(10):2267–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Steen WM (1998) Laser surface treatment. In: Laser material processing. Springer, pp 218–271

  3. 3.

    Powell J, Henry P, Steen W (1988) Laser cladding with preplaced powder: analysis of thermal cycling and dilution effects. Surf Eng 4(2):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Weerasinghe V, Steen W (1986) Laser surface cladding. In: Draper CW, Mazzoldi P (eds) Laser surface treatments of metals. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 360–387

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Henri P, Jonne N, Sebastian T, Jari T, Steffen N, Petri V (2012) Laser cladding with coaxial wire feeding. Int Congress Appl Lasers Electro-Opt 2012:1196–1201

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sexton L, Lavin S, Byrne G, Kennedy A (2002) Laser cladding of aerospace materials. J Mater Process Technol 122(1):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lin J, Steen W (1998) Design characteristics and development of a nozzle for coaxial laser cladding. J Laser Appl 10(2):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    De Oliveira U, Ocelik V, De Hosson JTM (2005) Analysis of coaxial laser cladding processing conditions. Surf Coat Technol 197(2–3):127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Frenk A, Vandyoussefi M, Wagniere J-D, Kurz W, Zryd A (1997) Analysis of the laser-cladding process for Stellite on steel. Metall Mater Trans B 28(3):501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jeng M-C, Yan L-Y, Doong J-L (1991) Wear behaviour of cobalt-based alloys in laser surface cladding. Surf Coat Technol 48(3):225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Weerasinghe V, Steen W (1987) Laser cladding with pneumatic powder delivery. In: Applied laser tooling. Springer, pp 183–211

  12. 12.

    Jouvard JM, Grevey D, Lemoine F, Vannes A (1997) Continuous wave Nd: Yag laser cladding modeling: a physical study of track creation during low power processing. J Laser Appl 9(1):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ibarra-Medina J, Pinkerton AJ (2011) Numerical investigation of powder heating in coaxial laser metal deposition. Surf Eng 27(10):754–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pan H, Liou F (2005) Numerical simulation of metallic powder flow in a coaxial nozzle for the laser aided deposition process. J Mater Process Technol 168(2):230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wen S, Shin Y, Murthy J, Sojka P (2009) Modeling of coaxial powder flow for the laser direct deposition process. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52(25–26):5867–5877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pinkerton AJ (2007) An analytical model of beam attenuation and powder heating during coaxial laser direct metal deposition. J Phys D Appl Phys 40(23):7323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tabernero I, Lamikiz A, Martinez S, Ukar E, De Lacalle LL (2012) Modelling of energy attenuation due to powder flow-laser beam interaction during laser cladding process. J Mater Process Technol 212(2):516–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Partes K (2009) Analytical model of the catchment efficiency in high speed laser cladding. Surf Coat Technol 204(3):366–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    St-Georges L (2007) Development and characterization of composite Ni–Cr+ Wc laser cladding. Wear 263(1–6):562–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pinkerton AJ, Li L (2004) The significance of deposition point standoff variations in multiple-layer coaxial laser cladding (coaxial cladding standoff effects). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(6):573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Denney P (1991) The process development for a portable Nd: Yag laser materials processing system. Int Congress Appl Lasers Electro-Opt 1991:140–149

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Singh J, Mazumder J (1987) Microstructure and wear properties of laser clad Fe− Cr− Mn− C alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 18(2):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Aleshin S (1996) Coaxial single point powder feed nozzle. In: Google Patents

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hoadley A, Frenk A, Marsden C (1991) A process overview of laser hardfacing. In: Proc. I Int. Conf. Surface Engineering: Practice and Prospects, Adelaide, Australia, pp 12–14

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu J, Li L (2005) Effects of powder concentration distribution on fabrication of thin-wall parts in coaxial laser cladding. Opt Laser Technol 37(4):287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Köhler H, Jayaraman V, Brosch D, Hutter F, Seefeld T (2013) A novel thermal sensor applied for laser materials processing. Phys Procedia 41:502–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ng G, Jarfors A, Bi G, Zheng H (2009) Porosity formation and gas bubble retention in laser metal deposition. Appl Phys A 97(3):641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shin YC, Purdue Research Foundation (2013) Integrated laser material processing cell. US Patent 8,604,381

  29. 29.

    Lin J, Hwang B-C (1999) Coaxial laser cladding on an inclined substrate. Opt Laser Technol 31(8):571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pinkerton AJ, Li L (2004) Modelling powder concentration distribution from a coaxial deposition nozzle for laser-based rapid tooling. J Manuf Sci Eng 126(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Launder BE, Spalding DB (1983) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. In: Numerical prediction of flow, heat transfer, turbulence and combustion. Elsevier, pp 96–116

  32. 32.

    Katinas C, Shang W, Shin YC, Chen J (2018) Modeling particle spray and capture efficiency for direct laser deposition using a four nozzle powder injection system. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(4):041014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    ANSYS (2009) Fluent 12.0 Theory Guide. Ansys Inc.

  34. 34.

    Liu J, Li L, Zhang Y, Xie X (2005) Attenuation of laser power of a focused Gaussian beam during interaction between a laser and powder in coaxial laser cladding. J Phys D Appl Phys 38(10):1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wen S, Shin YC (2010) Modeling of transport phenomena during the coaxial laser direct deposition process. J Appl Phys 108(4):044908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kusmoko A, Dunne DP, Li H (2014) A comparative study for wear resistant of Stellite 6 coatings on nickel alloy substrate produced by laser cladding, HVOF and plasma spraying techniques. J Curr Eng Technol 4(1):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Liu S, Shin YC (2019) Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy: a review. Mater Des 164:107552

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of this research by Naval Engineering Education Consortium (NEEC) NUWC IHEODTD (Grant #: N00174-17-2-0001). DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. NUWC Keyport #19-018.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yung C. Shin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katinas, C., Throop, T., Shin, Y.C. et al. Laser cladding of Stellite-6 with a coaxial nozzle via modeling and systematic experimental investigations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06624-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Laser cladding
  • Stellite-6
  • Modeling
  • Laser direct deposition