Study on cutting speed and energy utilization rate in processing stainless steel with abrasive water jet


Cutting speed and energy utilization rate are two very important technical indexes for judging metal processing with abrasive water jet (AWJ). Cutting speed is related to the time benefit, while energy utilization rate is related to the economic benefit of AWJ processing. Based on theory of inelastic impact mechanics and hydrodynamics, the mathematical model of cutting speed and energy utilization rate in processing stainless steel with AWJ was established. And the discrete numerical analysis of the mathematical model was carried out. The effects of different jet parameters on cutting speed and energy utilization rate were explored. Cutting experiments were carried out to verify the model. The results show that with the increase of outlet pressure, the cutting speed increases linearly. With the increase of outlet pressure of 5 MPa, the cutting speed increases by 0.075 mm/s. When the outlet pressure increases from 10 to 46 MPa, the energy utilization rate decreases from 137 to 51.2 MJ/mm3. With the increase of mass fraction of abrasive, the cutting speed and energy utilization rate will increase first and then decrease. When the mass fraction increases from 5 to 25%, the cutting speed increases from 0.1504 to 0.2024 mm/s then decreases to 0.1308 mm/s, and the energy utilization rate increases from 35.13 to 43.93 MJ/mm3 then decreases to 23.73 MJ/mm3. The change of size of abrasive particle has no significant effect on cutting speed and energy utilization rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9


  1. 1.

    Hashish M (1991) Characteristics of surface machined with abrasive water jet. J Eng Mater-TASME 113:354–362

  2. 2.

    Hashish M (1988) Visualization of surfaces machined with abrasive water jet cutting process. Exp Mech 28:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yang Z, Chen SM, Zhang YJ, Li M (2009) Development and application of high pressure water jet technology. Mech Manage Dev 24:87–90 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  4. 4.

    Feng YX (2007) Abrasive water jet milling ceramic materials processing technology research. Shandong University doctoral dissertation

  5. 5.

    Wang YW (2013) Abrasive water jet cutting titanium alloy experimental study. Xihua University master's degree thesis

  6. 6.

    Rongrun R (2002) Current status and development trend of water jet processing technology. Aviation Precision Manuf Technol 38:12–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  7. 7.

    Momber AW, Kovacevic R (1998) Principles of abrasive water jet machining. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Feng DC, Shi LL, Guo CW, Wang FC, Chen YQ (2018) Numerical and experimental study on the flow characteristics of abrasive slurry jet with polymer additives. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3289–3299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Guo R, Zhou CL, Liu XD (2019) Influence of abrasive types and particle sizes on the surface morphology of steel plate. Heavy Mach 4:22–25 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  10. 10.

    Tabatchikova TI, Tereshchenko NA, Yakovleva IL (2017) Effect of abrasive waterjet on the structure of the surface layer of Al-Mg alloy. Phys Met Metallogr 118:879–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mieszala M, Torrubia P, DA Lozano A (2017) Erosion mechanisms during abrasive waterjet machining: model microstructures and single particle experiments. J Mater Process Technol 247:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yuvaraj N, Pradeep KM (2017) Study and evaluation of abrasive water jet cutting performance on AA5083-H32 aluminum alloy by varying the jet impingement angles with different abrasive mesh sizes. Mach Sci Technol:1–31

  13. 13.

    Li WY, Wang J, Zhu H (2013) On ultrahigh velocity micro-particle impact on steels—a single impact study. Wear 305(1–2):216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pal VK, Tandon P (2013) Identification of the role of machinability and milling depth on machining time in controlled depth milling using abrasive water jet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(5–8):877–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Miao XJ, Qiang ZR, Wu MP, Song L, Ye F (2018) The optimal cutting times of multipass abrasive water jet cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:1779–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Perec A (2018) Experimental research into alternative abrasive material for the abrasive water-jet cutting of titanium. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:1529–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ming Ming IW, Azmi AI, Chuan LC, Mansor AF (2018) Experimental study and empirical analyses of abrasive waterjet machining for hybrid carbon/glass fiber-reinforced composites for improved surface quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9–12):3809–3822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Peng JQ, Song DL, Zong YY (2012) Research of removing force and removing model of the abrasive water jet on metal material. Mach Des Manuf 2:17–19 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  19. 19.

    Qiang CH, Wang FC, Guo CW (2018) Study on impact stress of abrasive slurry jet in cutting stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(1–4):297–309

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang FC, Xu QW, Feng DC, Guo CW (2018) Experiment study on performance of abrasive slurry jet with or without high polymer in stainless steel machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:2449–2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was funded by the Future Scientists Program of China University of Mining and Technology (2020WLKXJ044) and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuwen Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiang, C., Wang, F. & Guo, C. Study on cutting speed and energy utilization rate in processing stainless steel with abrasive water jet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 1875–1886 (2020).

Download citation


  • Abrasive water jet
  • Stainless steel
  • Cutting speed
  • Energy utilization rate