Development of a novel rectangular–circular grid filling pattern of fused deposition modeling in cellular lattice structures

Abstract

The mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling (FDM) are restricted by natural anisotropy, which hinders its wide application in fields such as aerospace engineering, where there are high strength/stiffness-to-weight ratio demands. Once the internal structure has been determined, the layer thickness and the filling mode would determine the mechanical properties of the printed part. However, the essence of the filling modes provided by commercial slicing software is based on robustness, manufacturing speed, and feasibility, without taking into consideration the high strength/stiffness-to-weight ratio of the parts. In order to reduce the weight and improve the mechanical properties of the printed parts, a lattice-like filling mode with grid used as the main body and inserted circles was designed, and the relevant filling algorithm was developed. Simulations have been performed to compare the capabilities of several parameter combinations, and subsequent mechanical tests have demonstrated that the tensile and compressive moduli of the printed parts filled by the proposed method are respectively about 43% and 23% higher than those of the equal-weight control parts filled by commercial software. This illustrates that the filling mode and corresponding parameter settings can reduce material consumption and improve mechanical performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

References

  1. 1.

    Khudiakova A, Arbeiter F, Spoerk M, Wolfahrt M, Godec D, Pinter G (2019) Inter-layer bonding characterisation between materials with different degrees of stiffness processed by fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf 28:184–193

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Liu J, Ma Y, Qureshi AJ, Ahmad R (2018) Light-weight shape and topology optimization with hybrid deposition path planning for FDM parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1955-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Akhoundi B, Behravesh AH (2019) Effect of filling pattern on the tensile and flexural mechanical properties of FDM 3D printed products. Exp Mech 59:883–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dudescu C, Racz L (2017) Effects of raster orientation, infill rate and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed materials. ACTA Universitatis Cibiniensis 69:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/aucts-2017-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Olmi G (2013) Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30. Comput Mater Sci 79:506–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rodríguez JF, Thomas JP, Renaud JE (2003) Design of fused-deposition ABS components for stiffness and strength. J Mech Des 125:545–551. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1582499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mostafa KG, Montemagno C, Qureshi AJ (2018) Strength to cost ratio analysis of FDM Nylon 12 3D Printed Parts. Procedia Manuf 26:753–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lin S, Xia L, Ma G, Zhou S, Xie YM (2019) A maze-like path generation scheme for fused deposition modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:1509–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03986-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhao H, Chen B, Gu F, Huang Q-X, Garcia J, Chen Y, Tu C, Benes B, Zhang H, Cohen-Or D (2016) Connected fermat spirals for layered fabrication. ACM Trans Graph 35:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897824.2925958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chou C, Couch J, Garside N, Whatley C, Junot J, Nelson J, Banna MAH (2017) Fused-deposition modeling raster parameter effects on mechanical properties of Taulman Bridge Nylon. Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.29215.46241

  11. 11.

    Wang YT, Liu Y, Liu X, Yang Z, Yan D-M, Liu L et al (2016) Global stiffness structural optimization for 3D printing under unknown loads. J Comput Graph Techn 5(3):18–38

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lee M, Fang Q, Cho Y, Ryu J, Liu L, Kim D-S (2018) Support-free hollowing for 3D printing via Voronoi diagram of ellipses. Comput Aided Des 101:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2018.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lu L, Chen B, Sharf A, Zhao H, Wei Y, Fan Q, Chen X, Savoye Y, Tu C, Cohen-Or D (2014) Build-to-last: strength to weight 3D printed objects. ACM Trans Graph 33:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601168

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Leary M, Mazur M, Elambasseril J, McMillan M, Chirent T, Sun Y, Qian M, Easton M, Brandt M (2016) Selective laser melting (SLM) of AlSi12Mg lattice structures. Mater Des 98:344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Raymont D (2012) Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 62:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fina F, Goyanes A, Madla CM, Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Kuek JM, Patel P, Gaisford S, Basit AW (2018) 3D printing of drug-loaded gyroid lattices using selective laser sintering. Int J Pharm 547:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dreifus G, Goodrick K, Giles S, Patel M, Foster RM, Williams C, Lindahl J, Post B, Roschli A, Love L, Kunc V (2017) Path optimization along lattices in additive manufacturing using the Chinese postman problem. 3D Print Addit Manuf 4:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2017.0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jin Y, Du J, He Y, Fu G (2017) Modeling and process planning for curved layer fused deposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:273–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9743-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jin Y, Du J, Ma Z, Liu A, He Y (2017) An optimization approach for path planning of high-quality and uniform additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:651–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0207-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Omairey SL, Dunning PD, Sriramula S (2019) Development of an ABAQUS plugin tool for periodic RVE homogenisation. Eng Comput 35:567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jamshidian M, Tehrany EA, Imran M, Jacquot M, Desobry S (2010) Poly-lactic acid: production, applications, nanocomposites, and release studies. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:552–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Torres J, Cotelo J, Karl J, Gordon AP (2015) Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. Jom 67:1183–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bijarimi M, Ahmad S, Rasid R (2012) Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of PLA/PP melt blends. International Conference on Agriculture, Chemical and Environmental Sciences (ICACES 2012) 6–7

Download references

Funding

This paper was sponsored by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (3194064).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gong Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Li, Y., Liu, B. et al. Development of a novel rectangular–circular grid filling pattern of fused deposition modeling in cellular lattice structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 3419–3436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05461-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fused deposition modeling
  • Filling mode
  • Path planning
  • Mechanical properties
  • Lattice structure