Robotic polishing can greatly improve the manufacturing efficiency of precision optics, and its tool influence function (TIF) needs to be modeled precisely for deterministic fabrication. When polishing large optics, the TIFs are significantly affected by the wear of the polishing pad, which in turn will change the material removal rate. In this paper, the generating mechanism of the pad wear is analyzed, so as to quantitatively predict the wear amount of the polishing pad under different processing parameters; consequently, the TIF error caused by pad wear can be compensated. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model can reliably predict the polishing pad shape and the corresponding TIF after different wearing time; henceforth, the resulting form quality and convergence rate of robotic polishing can be significantly improved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Pollicove H, Golini D (2003) Deterministic manufacturing processes for precision optical surfaces. Key Eng Mater 238:53–58
Pan R, Zhang Y, Ding J, Huang C, Wang Z (2016) Optimization strategy on conformal polishing of precision optics using bonnet tool. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 17(3):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-016-0035-7
Lin ZC, Wang RY, Jhang ZW (2018) Establishing a theoretical model for abrasive removal depth of silicon wafer chemical mechanical polishing by integrating a polishing times analytical model and specific down force energy theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9–12):4671–4683
Zhang L, Huang D, Zhou W, Fan C, Ji S, Zhao J (2017) Corrective polishing of freeform optical surfaces in an off-axis three-mirror imaging system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):2861–2869
Jones RA (1977) Optimization of computer controlled polishing. Appl Opt 16(1):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.16.000218
Wan S, Zhang X, He X, Xu M (2016) Modeling of edge effect in subaperture tool influence functions of computer controlled optical surfacing. Appl Opt 55(36):10223–10228. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.010223
Hill JM (2010) The large binocular telescope. Appl Opt 49(16):D115–D122. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.00D115
Cayrel M (2012) E-ELT optomechanics: overview. Proc SPIE 8444:84441X
Johns M (2008) The giant Magellan telescope (GMT). Proc SPIE 6986:698603
Clampin M (2008) Status of the James WEBB space telescope (JWST). Proc SPIE 7010:70100L
Preston FW (1927) The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines. J Glass Technol 11(44):214–256
Yu TK, Yu CC, Orlowski M (1993) A statistical polishing pad model for chemical-mechanical polishing. Proc IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 865–868
Xie Y, Bhushan B (1996) Effects of particle size, polishing pad and contact pressure in free abrasive polishing. Wear 200(1–2):281–295
Zhang G, Liu X, Lu W (2013) A parameter prediction model of running-in based on surface topography. Proc IMechE Part J: J Eng Tribol 227(9):1047–1055
Lu W, Zhang G, Liu X, Jiang X (2014) Prediction of surface topography at the end of sliding running-in wear based on areal surface parameters. Tribol Trans 57(3):553–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2014.887165
Jin XL, Zhang LC (2012) A statistical model for material removal prediction in polishing. Wear 274:203–211
Liu D, Chen G, Hu Q (2017) Material removal model of chemical mechanical polishing for fused silica using soft nanoparticles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):3515–3525
Lu W, Zhang P, Liu X, Zhai W, Zhou M, Luo J, Zeng W, Jiang X (2017) Influence of surface topography on torsional fretting wear under flat-on-flat contact. Tribol Int 109:367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.01.001
Byrne G, Mullany B, Young P (1999) The effect of pad wear on the chemical mechanical polishing of silicon wafers. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48(1):143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63151-5
McGrath J, Davis C (2004) Polishing pad surface characterisation in chemical mechanical planarisation. J Mater Process Technol 153:666–673
Lee C, Lee H, Jeong M, Jeong H (2011) A study on the correlation between pad property and material removal rate in CMP. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 12(5):917–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0123-7
Park K, Oh J, Jeong H (2008) Pad characterization and experimental analysis of pad wear effect on material removal uniformity in chemical mechanical polishing. Jpn J Appl Phys 47(10R):7812–7817
Greenwood JA, Williamson JP (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A 295(1442):300–319
Hibbeler RC (2016) Statics and mechanics of materials, 5th edn. Pearson Education
Hayes JB (1984) Linear methods of computer controlled optical figuring, Ph.D. Dissertation, Optical Sciences Center, University of Arizona. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852369
This study received financial support from the Science Challenging Program (JCKY2016212A506-0106), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51875107), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1104700), and European Horizon 2020 EMPIR project (15SIB01 FreeFORM).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, S., Zhang, X., Wang, W. et al. Effect of pad wear on tool influence function in robotic polishing of large optics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102, 2521–2530 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03344-7
- Optics fabrication
- Pad wear
- Tool influence function