Skip to main content
Log in

A slip-line model for serrated chip formation in machining of stainless steel and validation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machining of difficult-to-cut materials producing serrated chip formation has generated a significant interest among academic researchers and industry groups because of the need for understanding the fundamental mechanisms to model the process. Therefore, various analytical and numerical models have been developed in the recent past to investigate such machining operations. The slip-line theory is one of the established modeling methods, but slip-line modeling of serrated chip formation has not been investigated adequately. In this study, a new slip-line model for serrated chip formation in machining with rounded cutting edge tool is presented along with its associated hodograph. In addition, Oxley’s theory was integrated to the proposed slip-line model for stainless steel material, and the model was validated by experimental results. A good agreement between the experimental and analytically predicted results was obtained. The proposed slip-line model offers predictions of cutting and thrust forces, ploughing force, maximum and minimum chip thickness values, tool–chip contact length, chip up-curl radius, thickness of the primary shear zone, angular position of the stagnation point, shear strain, shear strain rate at the shear plane, and the prevalent flow stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Prager W, Hodge PG Jr (1951) Theory of perfectly plastic solids. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Prager W (1953) A geometrical discussion on the slip line field in plane plastic flow, vol 65. Transaction of Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Green AP (1951) The use of plasticine models to simulate the plastic flow of metals. Philos Mag 42:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green AP (1954) On the use of hodograph in problems of plane plastic strain. J Mech Phys Solids 2:73–80

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson W (1962) Some slip-line fields for swaging and expanding, indenting, extruding and machining for tools with curved dies. Int J Mech Sci 4:323–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Usui E, Hoshi K (1963) Slip-line fields in metal machining which involve centered fans, Proceedings of International Production Engineering Research Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 61–71

  8. Usui E, Kikuchi K, Hoshi K (1964) The theory of plasticity applied to machining with cut-away tools. J Eng Ind 86(2):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kudo H (1965) Some new slip-line solutions for two-dimensional steady-state machining. Int J Mech Sci 7:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson W, Mahtab FU (1965) Some solutions using slip-line fields and the method of upper bounds for milling, turning and boring, Proceedings of 6th International Machine Tool Design Research Conference, Manchester, England, pp. 463

  11. Dewhurst P, Collins IF (1973) A matrix technique for constructing slip-line field solutions to a class of plane strain plasticity problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 7:357–378

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dewhurst P (1978) On the non-uniqueness of the machining process. Proc R Soc London Ser A 360:587–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Challen JM (1983) Slip-line fields (for polishing) with a cylindrically shaped abrasive grit, Research Report No. 1983/AM/1. School of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Challen JM, Oxley PLB (1984) Some new thoughts on the mechanisms of sliding and sticking friction in metal working processes. Adv Technol Plast 1:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi T, Ramalingam S (1993) Modeling chip formation with grooved tools. Int J Mech Sci 35(9):741–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldorf DJ, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG (1998) A slip-line field for ploughing during orthogonal cutting. J Manuf Sci Eng 120:693–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maity KP, Das NS (1998) A slip-line solution to metal machining using a cutting tool with a step-type chip-breaker. J Mater Process Technol 79:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maity KP, Das NS (1999) A class of slip-line field solutions for metal machining with elastic contact. J Mater Process Technol 96:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maity KP, Das NS (2001) A class of slip-line field solutions for metal machining with Coulomb friction at the chip-tool interface. J Mater Process Technol 116:278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maity KP, Das NS (2001) A class of slipline field solutions for metal machining with slipping and sticking contact at the chip-tool interface. Int J Mech Sci 43:2435–2452

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Smithey DW, Kapoor SG, DeVor RE (2001) A new mechanistic model for predicting worn tool cutting forces. Mach Sci Technol 5(1):23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fang N, Jawahir IS, Oxley PLB (2001) A universal slip-line model with non-unique solutions for machining with curled chip formation and a restricted contact tool. Int J Mech Sci 43:557–580

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Fang N, Jawahir IS (2002) Analytical predictions and experimental validation of cutting force ratio, chip thickness, and chip back-flow angle in restricted contact machining using the universal slip-line model. Int J Mach Tool Manu 42:681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fang N, Jawahir IS (2001) A new methodology for determining the stress state of the plastic region in machining with restricted contact tools. Int J Mech Sci 43:1747–1770

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Fang N, Jawahir IS (2002) An analytical predictive model and experimental validation for machining with grooved tools incorporating the effects of strains, strain-rates and temperatures. Ann CIRP 51(1):83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fang N (2002) Machining with tool–chip contact on the tool secondary rake face—part I: a new slip-line model. Int J Mech Sci 44:2337–2354

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Fang N (2002) Machining with tool–chip contact on the tool secondary rake face—part II: analysis and discussion. Int J Mech Sci 44:2355–2368

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Fang N, Jawahir IS (2003) Analytical prediction of the chip back-flow angle in machining with restricted contact grooved tools. J Manuf Sci Eng 125:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Jawahir IS (2003) Prediction of tool-chip interface friction and chip-groove effects in machining with restricted contact grooved tools using the universal slip-line model. Key Eng Mater 233-236:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fang N (2003) Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool—part I: new model and theory. J Mech Phys Solids 51:715–742

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Fang N (2003) Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool—part II: analysis of the size effect and the shear strain-rate. J Mech Phys Solids 51:743–762

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Fang N, Yang J, Liu N (2004) Analytical predictive modelling of serrated chip formation in high speed machining of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, California USA, pp. 769–777

  33. Fang N, Wu Q (2005) The effects of chamfered and honed tool edge geometry in machining of three aluminum alloys. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45:1178–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Das NS, Dundur ST (2005) Slipline field solutions for metal machining with adhesion friction and elastic effects at the chip-tool contact region. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 219(1):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Das NS, Dundur ST (2006) A slipline field analysis of free-chip orthogonal machining with adhesion friction at rake face. Mach Sci Technol 10(3):371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fang N, Dewhurst P (2005) Slip-line modeling of built-up edge formation in machining. Int J Mech Sci 47:1079–1098

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang X, Jawahir IS (2007) Recent advances in plasticity applications in metal machining: slip-line models for machining with rounded cutting edge restricted contact grooved tools. Int J Mach Mach Mater 2(3–4):347–360

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dundur ST, Das NS (2009) Slipline field modeling of orthogonal machining for a worn tool with elastic effects and adhesion friction at the contact regions. J Mater Process Technol 209:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jin X, Altintas Y (2011) Slip-line field model of micro-cutting process with round tool edge effect. J Mater Process Technol 211:339–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ozturk S, Altan E (2012) Slip-line metal cutting model with negative rake angle. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 34(3):246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ozturk S, Altan E (2012) A slip-line approach to the machining with rounded-edge tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Uysal A, Altan E (2011) A new slip-line field modeling of orthogonal machining for a worn tool. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Models and Modelling Methodologies in Science and Engineering, Orlando, Florida, USA, vol 3, pp 193–198

    Google Scholar 

  43. Uysal A, Altan E (2014) Experimental investigation of a slip-line field model for a worn cutting tool. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 228(8):1398–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Uysal A, Altan E (2016) Slip-line field modelling of rounded-edge cutting tool for orthogonal machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 230(10):1925–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Uysal A, Altan E (2014) A new slip-line field modeling of orthogonal machining with a rounded-edge worn cutting tool. Mach Sci Technol 18(3):386–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Oxley PLB (1989) Mechanics of machining—an analytical approach to assessing machinability. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  47. Manyindo BM (1984) An experimental and theoretical investigation of forces and chip geometry as a basis of machinability assessment when machining various materials, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

  48. Manyindo BM, Oxley PLB (1986) Modelling the catastrophic shear type of chip when machining stainless steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 200(5):349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hill R (1954) On the limits set by plastic yielding to the intensity of singularities of stress. J Mech Phys Solids 2:278–285

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Wu Q (2007) Serrated chip formation and tool-edge wear in high-speed machining of advanced aerospace materials, Ph.D. dissertation, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA

  51. Joshi S, Tewari A, Joshi SS (2015) Microstructural characterization of chip segmentation under different machining environments in orthogonal machining of Ti6Al4V. J Eng Mater Technol 137:011005-1-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Alper Uysal acknowledges financial support from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) BIDEB-2219 Postdoctoral Research Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alper Uysal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uysal, A., Jawahir, I.S. A slip-line model for serrated chip formation in machining of stainless steel and validation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101, 2449–2464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3136-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3136-x

Keywords

Navigation