Advertisement

Microstructure simulations of Inconel 718 during selective laser melting using a phase field model

  • Xiaoqing WangEmail author
  • Kevin Chou
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 289 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the microstructure evolution of the Inconel 718 alloy fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) was investigated by a phase field model. The temperature gradient and the solidification velocity were first calculated from a finite element thermal model of SLM and then used as the input of the phase field model to simulate the microstructure growth with time. The influences of the build height and laser beam scanning speed on the microstructure evolution were studied and evaluated. The results show that the columnar dendritic arm spacing values estimated from the phase field simulations are comparable to experimental and analytical results. With the increase of the build height, the dominated values of thermal gradient and cooling rate decreased first and then slightly increased at the top end of the manufacturing process. The microstructural evolution along the build height agreed well with the experimental test. In addition, with the increase of the laser beam scanning speed, the dominant temperature gradient increased to a certain value and then decreased, and the direction of the maximum temperature gradient tended to be parallel to the part build direction. Moreover, the temperature gradient affects the dendrite growth significantly, a greater temperature gradient resulting in a higher growth speed.

Keywords

Selective laser melting Powder bed fusion additive manufacturing Inconel 718 Microstructure simulation Phase field method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Marshall Space Flight Center fabricated the experimental samples.

Funding information

This work was partially supported by the CFD Research Corporation (Huntsville, AL) through a NASA STTR project.

Supplementary material

170_2018_2814_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, Mukherjee T, Elmer JW, Milewski JO, Beese AM, Wilson-Heid A, de A, Zhang W (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components—process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olakanmi EO, Cochrane RF, Dalgarno KW (2015) A review on selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM) of aluminium alloy powders: processing, microstructure, and properties. Prog Mater Sci 74:401–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang X, Gong X, Chou K (2017) Review on powder-bed laser additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231:1890–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415619883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ji Y, Chen L, Chen L-Q (2018) Understanding microstructure evolution during additive manufacturing of metallic alloys using phase-field modeling. In: Gouge M, Michaleris P (eds) Thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Elsevier Inc.,Oxford, United Kingdom, pp 93–116Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dinda GP, Dasgupta AK, Mazumder J (2012) Texture control during laser deposition of nickel-based superalloy. Scr Mater 67:503–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chlebus E, Gruber K, Kuźnicka B, Kurzac J, Kurzynowski T (2015) Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of Inconel 718 processed by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 639:647–655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tucho WM, Cuvillier P, Sjolyst-Kverneland A, Hansen V (2017) Microstructure and hardness studies of Inconel 718 manufactured by selective laser melting before and after solution heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 689:220–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.02.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang D, Niu W, Cao X, Liu Z (2015) Effect of standard heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melting manufactured Inconel 718 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 644:32–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi J-P, Shin GH, Yang S, Yang DY, Lee JS, Brochu M, Yu JH (2017) Densification and microstructural investigation of Inconel 718 parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Powder Technol 310:60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneider J, Lund B, Fullen M (2018) Effect of heat treatment variations on the mechanical properties of Inconel 718 selective laser melted specimens. Addit Manuf 21:248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cao GH, Sun TY, Wang CH, Li X, Liu M, Zhang ZX, Hu PF, Russell AM, Schneider R, Gerthsen D, Zhou ZJ, Li CP, Chen GF (2018) Investigations of γ′, γ″ and δ precipitates in heat-treated Inconel 718 alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Charact 136:398–406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vastola G, Zhang G, Pei QX, Zhang YW (2016) Modeling the microstructure evolution during additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V: a comparison between electron beam melting and selective laser melting. JOM 68:1370–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1890-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andani M et al (2018) Micromechanics modeling of metallic alloys 3D printed by selective laser melting. Mater Des 137:204–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu S et al (2018) Microstructure prediction of selective laser melting AlSi10Mg using finite element analysis. Mater Des 142:319–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khairallah SA, Anderson A (2014) Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder. J Mater Process Technol 214:2627–2636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Körner C, Attar E, Heinl P (2011) Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes. J Mater Process Technol 211:978–987.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yin H, Felicelli SD (2010) Dendrite growth simulation during solidification in the LENS process. Acta Mater 58:1455–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fallah V, Amoorezaei M, Provatas N, Corbin SF, Khajepour A (2012) Phase-field simulation of solidification morphology in laser powder deposition of Ti–Nb alloys. Acta Mater 60:1633–1646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Markl M, Körner C (2016) Multiscale modeling of powder bed-based additive manufacturing. Annu Rev Mater Res 46:93–123.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ingo S (2009) Phase-field models in materials science. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:073001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galarraga H, Warren RJ, Lados DA, Dehoff RR, Kirka MM (2017) Fatigue crack growth mechanisms at the microstructure scale in as-fabricated and heat treated Ti-6Al-4V ELI manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM). Eng Fract Mech 176:263–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu D, Wang Y (2017) Mesoscale multi-physics simulation of solidification in selective laser melting process using a phase field and thermal lattice Boltzmann model:V001T002A027.  https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-67633
  23. 23.
    Tan W, Bailey NS, Shin YC (2011) A novel integrated model combining cellular automata and phase field methods for microstructure evolution during solidification of multi-component and multi-phase alloys. Comput Mater Sci 50:2573–2585.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.03.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang L, Wei Y, Yu F, Zhang Q, Peng Q (2016a) Phase-field simulation of dendrite growth under forced flow conditions in an Al–Cu welding molten pool. Cryst Res Technol 51:602–609.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.201600165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang L, Wei Y, Zhan X, Yu F (2016b) A phase field investigation of dendrite morphology and solute distributions under transient conditions in an Al–Cu welding molten pool. Sci Technol Weld Join 21:446–451.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2015.1124504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gong X, Chou K (2015) Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution in electron beam additive manufacturing. JOM 67:1176–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1352-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lopez-Botello O et al (2017) Two-dimensional simulation of grain structure growth within selective laser melted AA-2024. Mater Des 113:369–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panwisawas C et al (2017) Mesoscale modelling of selective laser melting: thermal fluid dynamics and microstructural evolution. Comput Mater Sci 126:479–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee Y, Zhang W (2016) Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 12:178–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Foroozmehr A et al (2016) Finite element simulation of selective laser melting process considering optical penetration depth of laser in powder bed. Mater Des 89:255–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cole JV (2017) Multiple high-fidelity modeling tools for metal additive manufacturing process development, (Research Report)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zeng K, Pal D, Stucker B (2012) A review of thermal analysis methods in laser sintering and selective laser melting, pp 796–814 http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/Manuscripts/2012/2012-60-Zeng.pdf Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cheng B, Gong X, Xiaoqing W, Chou K (2014) Thermal analysis, microstructural characterization and nanoindentation for electron beam additive manufacturing. The Fourteenth Annual Early Career Technical Conference, Birmingham, pp 196–203Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sahoo S, Chou K (2016) Phase-field simulation of microstructure evolution of Ti–6Al–4V in electron beam additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 9:14–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karma A (2001) Phase-field formulation for quantitative modeling of alloy solidification. Phys Rev Lett 87(115701).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115701
  36. 36.
    Provatas N, Elder K (2011) Phase-field methods in materials science and engineering. WileyGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ohno M, Takaki T, Shibuta Y (2016) Variational formulation and numerical accuracy of a quantitative phase-field model for binary alloy solidification with two-sided diffusion. Phys Rev E 93:012802.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.012802 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Keller T, Lindwall G, Ghosh S, Ma L, Lane BM, Zhang F, Kattner UR, Lass EA, Heigel JC, Idell Y, Williams ME, Allen AJ, Guyer JE, Levine LE (2017) Application of finite element, phase-field, and CALPHAD-based methods to additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys. Acta Mater 139:244–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Farzadi A, Do-Quang M, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi A, Amberg G (2008) Phase-field simulation of weld solidification microstructure in an Al–Cu alloy. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 16:065005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/16/6/065005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Greenwood M, Haataja M, Provatas N (2004) Crossover scaling of wavelength selection in directional solidification of binary alloys. Phys Rev Lett 93:246101–246101.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.246101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kim SG, Kim WT, Suzuki T (1999) Phase-field model for binary alloys. Phys Rev E 60:7186–7197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nastac L (1999) Numerical modeling of solidification morphologies and segregation patterns in cast dendritic alloys. Acta Mater 47:4253–4262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00325-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu Z, Qi H (2015) Effects of processing parameters on crystal growth and microstructure formation in laser powder deposition of single-crystal superalloy. J Mater Process Technol 216:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang HM, Zhang JH, Tang YJ, Hu ZQ, Yukawa N, Morinaga M, Murata Y (1992) Rapidly solidified MC carbide morphologies of a laser-glazed single-crystal nickel-base superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 156:109–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(92)90421-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kou S (1987) Welding metallurgy, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burden MH, Hunt JD (1974a) Cellular and dendritic growth. I. J Cryst Growth 22:99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(74)90126-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Burden MH, Hunt JD (1974b) Cellular and dendritic growth. II. J Cryst Growth 22:109–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(74)90127-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang X, Chou K (2017a) Electron backscatter diffraction analysis of Inconel 718 parts fabricated by selective laser melting additive manufacturing. JOM 69:402–408.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2198-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang X, Keya T, Chou K (2016c) Build height effect on the Inconel 718 parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Procedia Manufacturing 5:1006–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang X, Chou K (2017b) Effects of thermal cycles on the microstructure evolution of Inconel 718 during selective laser melting process. Additive Manufacturing 18:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jia Q, Gu D (2014) Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: densification, microstructure and properties. J Alloys Compd 585:713–721.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    AlMangour B et al (2018) Thermal behavior of the molten pool, microstructural evolution, and tribological performance during selective laser melting of TiC/316L stainless steel nanocomposites: experimental and simulation methods. J Mater Process Technol 257:288–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang X, Gong X, Chou K (2015) Scanning speed effect on mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy processed by electron beam additive manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 1:287–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dehoff RR, Kirka MM, Sames WJ, Bilheux H, Tremsin AS, Lowe LE, Babu SS (2015) Site specific control of crystallographic grain orientation through electron beam additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 31:931–938.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nastac L, Valencia JJ, Tims ML, Dax FR (2001) Advances in the solidification of IN718 and RS5 alloys. Proc Superalloys 718:625–706.  https://doi.org/10.7449/2001/Superalloys_2001_103_112 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied EngineeringJacksonville State UniversityJacksonvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations