Advertisement

Application of minimum quantity lubrication techniques in machining process of titanium alloy for sustainability: a review

  • Khaled Ali OsmanEmail author
  • Hakkı Özgür Ünver
  • Ulvi Şeker
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Recently, the manufacturing sector is increasingly keen to apply sustainability at all levels of sustainability from system to products and processes. At the processes level, cutting fluids (CFs) are among the most unsustainable materials and need to be addressed properly in accordance with three main and decisive aspects, also known as the triple bottom line: ecology, society, and economics. Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) is a promising technique that minimizes the use of CFs, thus improving sustainability. This paper presents a review of the literature available on the use of the MQL technique during different machining processes involving titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V). To carry out the study, four search engines were used to focus on the most cited articles published over a span of 17 years from 2000 to 2016. The performance and drawbacks are compiled for each eco-friendly technique: dry, MQL, and cryogenics with combinations of MQL and cryogenics, critically considering machining parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate, and output measures, namely surface roughness, tool life, and cutting temperature. After drawing conclusions from critical evaluation of research body, future research avenues in the field are proposed for the academics and industry.

Keywords

Sustainable manufacturing Titanium Machining Minimum quantity lubrication Cutting fluids 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Munoz AA, Sheng P (1995) An analytical approach for determining the environmental impact of machining processes. J Mater Process Technol 53:736–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gutowski T, Murphy C, Allen D, Bauer D, Bras B, Piwonka T, Sheng P, Sutherland J, Thurston D, Wolff E (2005) Environmentally benign manufacturing: observations from Japan, Europe and the United States. J Clean Prod 13(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jawahir IS, Jayal AD (2011) Product and process innovation for modeling of sustainable machining processes. In: Seliger G, MMK K, Jawahir IS (eds) Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, pp 301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Granados S, Jawahir IS, Fernandez J (2009) A comprehensive criterion for sustainability evaluation of machining processes. Proceedings of the 7th global conference on sustainable manufacturing, Chennai, India, 385–391Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010) Transitioning to sustainable production—part I: application on machining technologies. J Clean Prod 18(2):174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haapala KR, Zhao F, Camelio J, Sutherland JW, Skerlos SJ, Da D, Jawahir IS, Clarens AF, Rickli JL (2013) A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 135(4):041013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Dillon OWJ, Jawahir IS (2010) Sustainable manufacturing: modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2(3):144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dahmus JB, Gutowski TG (2004) An environmental analysis of machining. In: ASME International mechanical engineering congress and RD & D Expo, Anaheim, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Gurston DH et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiktorsson M, Bellgran M, Jackson M (2008) Sustainable manufacturing challenges and possibilities for research and industry from a Swedish perspective. The 41st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Tokyo, Japan, 119–122Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steinhilper R, Kruse A, Drews T (2013) Ecological analysis of manufacturing systems focusing on the identification of variety-induced non value adding emission. In: Seliger G (ed) Proceedings of the 11th global conference on sustainable manufacturing—innovative solutions. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, Berlin 66–71Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elias C, Lima J, Valiev R, Meyers M (2008) Biomedical applications of titanium and its alloys. J Miner Met Mater Soc 60:46–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Follansbee P, Gray GT (1989) An analysis of the low temperature, low and high strain-rate deformation of Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Trans A 20:863–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pramanik A, Littlefair G (2015) Developments in machining of stacked materials made of CFRP and titanium/aluminum alloys. Mach Sci Technol 18(4):485–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hong SY, Markus I, Jeong W (2001) New cooling approach and tool life improvement in cryogenic machining of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2245–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pervaiz S (2014) Investigation cooling and lubrication strategies for sustainable machining of titanium alloys: impact on machinability and environmental performance. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allwood J (2005) Sustainable manufacturing seminar series Institute of Manufacturing. University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jawahir IS, Dillon Jr OW (2007) Sustainable manufacturing processes: new challenges for developing predictive models and optimization techniques. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on sustainable manufacturing SM1, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1–15Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu T, Gupta A, Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Feng SC, Dillon OW, Jawahir IS (2010) A framework of product and process metrics for sustainable manufacturing. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, November 22–24, Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ezugwu EO (2005) Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1353–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stanford M, Lister PM (2002) The future role of metalworking fluids in metal cutting operations. Ind Lubr Tribol 54:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Najiha MS, Rahman MM, Yusoff AR (2016) Environmental impacts and hazards associated with metal working fluids and recent advances in the sustainable systems: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1008–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Groover MP (2002) Solutions manual: fundamentals of modern manufacturing. WileyGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    El Baradie MA (1996) Cutting fluids: part II. Recycling and clean machining. J Mater Process Technol 56(1–4):798–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sheehan MJ, Hands D (2007) Metalworking fluid mist-strategies to reduce exposure: a comparison of new and old transmission case transfer lines. J Occup Environ Hyg 4(4):288–300Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2014) Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod 83:33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Daniel CM, KVC R, Olson WW, Sutherland JW (1996) Effect of cutting fluid properties and application variables on heat transfer in turning and boring operations. Japan/USA Symp Flex Autom 2:1119–1126Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park D, Stewart PA, Coble JB (2009) A comprehensive review of the literature on exposure to metalworking fluids. J Occup Environ Hyg 6(9):530–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rabiei F, Rahimi AR, Hadad MJ, Ashrafijou M (2015) Performance improvement of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in surface grinding by modeling and optimization. J Clean Prod 86:447–460Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adler DP, Hii WWS, Michalek DJ, Sutherland JW (2006) Examining the role of cutting fluids in machining and efforts to address associated environmental/health concerns. Mach Sci Technol 10:23–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kendall LA (1998) Friction and wear of cutting tools and cutting tool materials. ASM Handbook 18:609–620Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brinksmeier E, Meyer D, Huesmann-Cordes AG, Herrmann C (2015) Metalworking fluids—mechanisms and performance. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64(2):605–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang S, Li JF, Wang YW (2012) Tool life and cutting forces in end milling Inconel 718 under dry and minimum quantity cooling lubrication cutting conditions. J Clean Prod 32:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M, Demirbas E, Simsek BT (2013) Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design of experiments. J Clean Prod 42:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dudzinski D, Devillez A, Moufki A, Larrouquère D, Zerrouki V, Vigneau J (2004) A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(4):439–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Erdel BP (1999) Environmental issues in machining. SME Machining Technology, vol 10, no 4, 4th quarterGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McClure T, Adams R, Gugger M (2004) Comparison of flood vs. microlubrication on machining performance. Unist Technical PaperGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(2):511–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Denkena B (2003) Advancing cutting technology. Ann CIRP 52(2):483–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ulatan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:250–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jawahir IS, Brinksmeier E, M’Saoubi R, Aspinwall DK, Outeiro JC, Meyer D, Umbrello D, Jayal AD (2011) Surface integrity in material removal processes: recent advances. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(2):603–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rahman M, Senthil Kumar A, Salam MU (2002) Experimental evaluation on the effect of minimal quantities of lubricant in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(5):539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Su Y, He N, Li L, Li XL (2006) An experimental investigation of effects of cooling/lubrication conditions on tool wear in high-speed end milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Wear 261(7–8):760–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dhar NR, Islam MW, Islam S, Mithu MAH (2006) The influence of minimum quality lubrication (MQL) on cutting temperature, chip and dimensional accuracy in turning AISI-1040 steel. J Mater Process Technol 171:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Attanasio A, Gelfi M, Giardini C, Remino C (2006) Minimum quantity lubrication in turning: effect on tool wear. Wear 260:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sharma S, Dograb M, Suri NM (2009) Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Varadarajan AS, Philip PK, Ramamoorthy B (2002) Investigation of hard turning with minimal cutting fluid application and its comparison with dry and wet turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rahman M, Wang Z, Wong Y (2006) A review on high-speed machining of titanium alloys. JSME Int J 49(1):11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brinksmeier E, Janssen R (2002) Drilling of multi-layer composite materials consisting of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP), titanium and aluminum alloys. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 51:87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Sadeghi MH, Daneshi A, Stockert S, Rasifard A (2009) An expermental investigation of the effects of workpiece and grinding parameters on minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:924–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Knight WA, Boothroyd G (2005) Fundamentals of metal machining and machine tools, vol 69. CRCGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y (2013) A critical assessment of lubrication techniques in machining processes: a case for minimum quantity lubrication using vegetable oil-based lubricant. J Clean Prod 41:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    King N, Keranen L, Gunter K, Sutherland J (2001) Wet versus dry turning: a comparison of machining costs, product quality, and aerosol formationGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Upadhyay V, Jain PK, Mehta NK, Branko K (2012) Minimum quantity lubrication assisted turning—an overview. DAAAM International Vienna, Vienna, pp 463–478Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ghosh S, Rao PV (2015) Application of sustainable techniques in metal cutting for enhanced machinability: a review. J Clean Prod 100:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brockhoff T, Walter A (1998) Fluid minimization in cutting and grinding. Abras Magazine:38–42Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kamata Y, Obikawa T (2007) High speed MQL finish-turning of Inconel 718 with different coated tools. J Mater Process Tech 192:281–286Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Filipovic A, Stephenson D (1996) Minimum quantity lubrication (mql) applications in automotive power-train machining. Mach Sci Technol 10:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sharif MN, Pervaiz S, Deiab I (2016) Potential of alternative lubrication strategies for metal cutting processes: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:2447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Catai RE, Fusse RY, FranÇa TV, Aguiar PR (2005) Study on the behavior of the minimum quantity lubricant-MQL technique under different lubrication and cooling conditions when grinding ABNT 4340 steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng XXVII:192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172(2):299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Obikawa T, Kamata Y, Asano Y, Nakayama K, Otieno AW (2008) Micro-liter lubrication machining of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(15):1605–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Liu ZQ, Xu JY, Han S, Chen M (2013) A coupling method of response surfaces (CRSM) for cutting parameters optimization in machining titanium alloy under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) condition. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(5):693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Deiab I, Raza SW, Pervaiz S (2014) Analysis of lubrication strategies for sustainable machining during turning of titanium Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Procedia CIRP 17:766–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pervaiz S, Rashid A, Deiab I, Nicolescu CM (2016) An experimental investigation on effect of minimum quantity cooling lubrication (MQCL) in machining titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:1371–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Karaguzel U, Olgun U, Uysal E, Budak E, Bakkal M (2015) Increasing tool life in machining of difficult-to-cut materials using nonconventional turning processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77: 1993–2004Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Karaguzel U, Olgun U, Uysal E, Budak E, Bakkal M (2015) Increasing tool life in machining of difficult-to-cut materials using nonconventional turning processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:1993–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Raza SW, Pervaiz S, Deiab I (2014) Tool wear patterns when turning of titanium alloy using sustainable lubrication strategies. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15(9):1979–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Xu J, Liu Z, An Q, Chen M (2012) Wear mechanism of high-speed turning Ti-6Al-4V with TiAlN and AlTiN coated tools in dry and MQL conditions. Adv Mater Res 497:30–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lin H, Wang C, Yuan Y, Chen Z, Wang Q, Xiong W (2015) Tool wear in Ti–6Al–4V alloy turning under oils on water cooling comparing with cryogenic air mixed with minimal quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1):87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rotella G, Dillon OW Jr, Umbrello D, Settineri L, Jawahir IS (2014) The effects of cooling conditions on surface integrity in machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1–4):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wang ZG, Rahman M, Wong YS, Neo KS, Sun J, Tan CH, Onozuka H (2009) Study on orthogonal turning of titanium alloys with different coolant supply strategies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:621–632Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Li R, Riester L, Watkins TR, Blau PJ, Shih AJ (2008) Metallurgical analysis and nanoindentation characterization of Ti-6Al-4V workpiece and chips in high-throughput drilling. Mater Sci Eng A 472(1–2):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wang ZG, Rahman M, Wong YS, Neo KS, Sun J, Tan CH, Onozuka H (2009) Study on orthogonal turning of titanium alloys with different coolant supply strategies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:621–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sun J, Wong YS, Rahman M, Wang ZG, Neo KS, Tan CH, Onozuka H (2006) Effects of coolant supply methods and cutting conditions on tool life in end milling titanium alloy. Mach Sci Technol 10(3):355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Autret R, Liang S (2003) Minimum quantity lubrication in finish hard turning. Proceedings of International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nguyen T, Nguyen D, Howes P, Kwon P, Park KH (2015) Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) using vegetable oil with nano-platelet solid lubricant in milling titanium alloy, ASME 2015 Int Manuf Sci and Engg Conf, North Carolina, USA. Paper No. MSEC2015-9466Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Park KH, Yang GD, Lee HJ, Jeong SW, Lee DY (2014) Eco-friendly face milling of titanium alloy. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15:1159–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jiang F, Li J, Yan L, Sun J, Zhang S (2010) Optimizing end-milling parameters for surface roughness under different cooling/lubrication conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(9-12):841–851Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bermingham MJ, Sim WM, Gardiner S, Dargusch MS (2015) Tool life and wear mechanisms in laser assisted milling Ti-6Al-4V. Wear 322–323:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yuan S, Yan L, Liu W, Liu Q (2011) Effects of cooling air temperature on cryogenic machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 211(3):356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Liu ZQ, Chen M, An QL (2015) Investigation of friction in end-milling of Ti-6Al-4V under different green cutting conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5):1181–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Okada M, Hosokawa A, Asakawa N (2014) End milling of stainless steel and titanium alloy in an oil mist environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1255–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yasir A, Che Hassan C, Jaharah A, Norhamidi M, Gusri A, Zaid A (2010) Cutting force analysis when milling Ti–6Al–4V under dry and near dry conditions using coated tungsten carbides. Adv Mater Res 129:993–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wang F, Zhao J, Li A, Zhao J (2014) Experimental study on cutting forces and surface integrity in high-speed side milling of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Mach Sci Technol 18(3):448–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sun S, Brandt M, Barnes JE, Dargusch MS (2010) Investigation of the cutting forces and tool wear in laser assisted milling of Ti6Al4V alloy. Proc of the 36th International MATADOR Conference 3:255–258Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ma J, Ge X, Lei S (2013) Energy efficiency in thermally assisted machining of titanium alloy: a numerical study. J Manuf Sci Eng 135(6):061001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hedberg GK, Shin YC (2015) Laser assisted milling of Ti-6Al-4V ELI with the analysis of surface integrity and its economics. Lasers Manuf Mater Process 2:164–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kim DH, Lee CM (2015) A study on the laser-assisted ball-end milling of difficult-to-cut materials using a new back-and-forth preheating method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 5:1–10Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Churi NJ, Wang ZM, Jeong W (2006) Rotary ultrasonic machining of titanium alloy: effects of machining variables. Mach Sci Technol 10:301–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Pujana J, Rivero A, Celaya A, Lopez de Lacalle LN (2009) Analysis of ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Ti6A14V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:500–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Yap TC, El-Tayeb NSM, Brevern PV (2013) Cutting forces, friction coefficient and surface roughness in machining Ti-5Al-4V-0.6 Mo-0.4 Fe using carbide tool K313 under low pressure liquid nitrogen. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 35(1):–5Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Rasidi I, Rahim EA, Ibrahim AA, Maskam NA, Ghani SC (2014) The effect on the application of coolant and ultrasonic vibration assisted micro milling on machining performance. Appl Mech Mater 660:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Muhammad R, Maurotto A, Demiral M, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Thermally enhanced ultrasonically assisted machining of Ti alloy. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Zhao W, He N, Li L (2007) High speed milling of Ti6Al4V alloy with minimal quantity lubrication. Key Eng Mater 375–376:435–439Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Rahima EA, Sharif S (2007) Tool failure modes and wear mechanism of coated carbide tools when drilling Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Precis Technol 1:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Percin M, Aslantas K, Ucun I, Kaynak Y, Cicek A (2016) Micro-drilling of Ti–6Al–4V alloy: the effects of cooling/lubricating. Precis Eng 45:450–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Li R, Hegde P, Shih AJ (2007) High-throughput drilling of titanium alloys. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47:63–74Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Rahim EA, Sasahara H (2011) A study of the effect of palm oil as MQL lubricant on high speed drilling of titanium alloys. Tribol Int 44(3):309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Zeilmann RP, Weingaertner WL (2006) Analysis of temperature during drilling of Ti6Al4V with minimal quantity of lubricant. J Mater Process Technol 179:124–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Jau-Min LR (2007) High throughput drilling of titanuium alloys. Chinese J Mech Eng 20(3):1Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Armendia M, Garay A, Iriarte LM, Arrazola PJ (2010) Comparison of the machinabilities of Ti6Al4V and TIMETAL® 54 M using uncoated WC-Co tools. J Mater Process Technol 210:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Le Coz G, Marinescu M, Devillez A, Dudzinski D, Velnom L (2012) Measuring temperature of rotating cutting tools: application to MQL drilling and dry milling of aerospace alloys. Appl Therm Eng 36:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Saglam H, Yaldiz S, Unsacar F (2007) The effect of tool geometry and cutting speed on main cutting force and tool tip temperature. Mater Des 28:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Furness, R, Stoll, A, Nordstrom, G, Martini, G, Johnson, J, Loch, T, Klosinski, R (2006). Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) machining for complex powertrain components. ASME 2006 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Michigan, USA, 965–973Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Mellinger JC, Ozdoganlar OB, Devor RE, Kapoor SG (2002) Modeling chip-evacuation forces and prediction of chip-clogging in drilling. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 124(3):605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khaled Ali Osman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hakkı Özgür Ünver
    • 2
  • Ulvi Şeker
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing EngineeringAtilim UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory, Department of Mechanical EngineeringTOBB University of Economics and TechnologyAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Technical Education FacultyGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations