An experimental study of pneumatic extruding direct writing deposition-based additive manufacturing

  • Ming Ma
  • Honghai Zhang


A pneumatic extruding direct writing deposition process is proposed in this paper. Compressed high-purity nitrogen was selected as a driving force to squeeze a liquid metal out of a nozzle. Combining this step with movement of the underlying substrate enabled the formation of metal patterns. Four nozzles with different structures were employed in this research, and the effect of the structural design of the nozzle on the flow of the liquid metal was analyzed both theoretically and experimentally. The influence of the distance between the nozzle and the substrate on the deposited metal lines was also investigated. To demonstrate a practical application, several metal patterns were successfully fabricated, each with a uniform and continuous metal line. Furthermore, three-dimensional objects were also fabricated. The results of a morphological analysis of the deposited metal lines show that the throttle channels added to the nozzle significantly decrease the flow of the metal fluid; as a result, nozzles with throttle channels produce thinner metal lines. The distance between the nozzle and the substrate influences the outline of the cross section of the deposited metal lines without significantly decreasing the outflow of the liquid metal.


Pneumatic extruding Additive manufacturing Metals Direct writing Throttle channel 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant no. 51175204] and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [grant no. 20120142130011].


  1. 1.
    Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. SpringerUS, New York, pp 269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgese M, Dicandia FA, Costa F, Genovesi S, Manara G (2017) An inkjet printed chipless RFID sensor for wireless humidity monitoring. IEEE Sensors J 17:4699–4707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis JA (2006) Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv Funct Mater 16:2193–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewis JA, Gratson GM (2004) Direct writing in three dimensions. Mater Today 7:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leigh SJ, Bradley RJ, Purssell CP, Billson DR, Hutchins DA (2012) A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PLoS One 7:e49365-1–e49365-6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang YL, Chen H, Yang JW, Tian WL, Wang WZ (2017) 3D-printed OFETs of the 1,4-bis(3-phenylquinoxalin-2-yl)benzene-based polymer semiconductors. Polym Chem 8:4878–4886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poldsalu I, Harjo M, Tamm T, Uibu M, Peikolainen AL, Kiefer R (2017) Inkjet-printed hybrid conducting polymer-activated carbon aerogel linear actuators driven in an organic electrolyte. Sensors Actuators B Chem 250:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan H, Chen ZH, Zheng Y, Newman C, Quinn JR, Dotz F, Kastler M, Facchetti A (2009) A high-mobility electron-transporting polymer for printed transistors. Nature 457:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cui Z (2012) Printed electronics: materials, technologies and applications. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 66–80Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gao Y, Li H, Liu J (2012) Direct writing of flexible electronics through room temperature liquid metal ink. PLoS One 7:e45485-1–e45485-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen W, Thornley L, Coe HG, Tonneslan SJ, Vericella JJ, Zhu C, Duoss EB, Hunt RM, Wight MJ, Apelian D, Pascall AJ, Kuntz JD, Spadaccini CM (2017) Direct metal writing: controlling the rheology through microstructure. Appl Phys Lett 110:094104-1–094104-5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen ZR, Wang HJ, Liu QZ, Cai WH (2013) Engineering fluid mechanics. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 276–280Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ionaitis RR, Chekov ME (2014) Investigation of the hydrodynamic structure of throttled fluid flow. Atomic Energy 115:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu YY, Fang SH, Han ZZ, Liu Y, Yu YZ, Hu QX (2013) Pneumatic feeding system research of the low-temperature deposition manufacturing based on system identification and PID control method. J Pure Appl Microbiol 7:447–452Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations