Advertisement

Mechanical properties of PLA-based composites for fused deposition modeling technology

  • S. M. Lebedev
  • O. S. Gefle
  • E. T. Amitov
  • D. V. Zhuravlev
  • D. Y. Berchuk
  • E. A. Mikutskiy
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 133 Downloads

Abstract

To predict the mechanical behavior of 3D printed products, it is important to understand the composite material properties and the effect that parameters of 3D printing process have on the properties of these materials. The mechanical properties of PLA-based composite materials were studied in this work. The mechanical properties of the hot pressed samples were compared to those of the 3D printed samples. The elongation at break and the yield strength of the samples fabricated by 3D printing are decreased by 15–60% compared to those for the hot pressed samples. It has been found that the mechanical properties of 3D printed samples do not practically depending on the deposition scheme.

Keywords

Composite polymer materials Poly(lactic acid) Mechanical properties Fused deposition modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work from the National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (project TPU CEP-IPHT-73/2017).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Song Y, Li Y, Song W, Yee K, Lee K-Y, Tagarielli VL (2017) Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Mater Des 123:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ciurana J, Serenóa L, Vallèsa E (2013) Selecting process parameters in RepRap additive manufacturing system for PLA scaffolds manufacture. Procedia CIRP 5:152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, Namiki M, Jeong T-K, Asahara H, Horiguchi K, Nakamura T, Todoroki A, Hirano Y (2016) Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation. Sci Rep 6:23058.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Es-Said OS, Foyos J, Noorani R, Mendelson M, Marloth R, Pregger BA (2000) Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater Manuf Process 15(1):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carneiro OS, Silva AF, Gomes R (2015) Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Des 83:768–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lebedev SM, Gefle OS, Amitov ET, Berchuk DY, Zhuravlev DV (2017) Poly(lactic acid)-based polymer composites with high electric and thermal conductivity and their characterization. Polym Test 58:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tekce HS, Kumlutas D, Tavman IH (2007) Effect of particle shape on thermal conductivity of copper reinforced polymer composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 26(1):113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lebedev SM, Gefle OS, Amitov ET, Berchuk DY, Zhuravlev DV (2017) Influence of heavy metal powders on rheological properties of poly(lactic acid). Russ Phys J 60(4):624–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laureto J, Tomasi J, King JA, Pearce JM (2017) Thermal properties of 3-D printed polylactic acid-metal composites. Prog Addit Manuf 2:57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chieng BW, Ibrahim NA, Then YY, Loo YY (2016) Mechanical, thermal, and morphology properties of poly(lactic acid) plasticized with poly(ethylene glycol) and epoxidized palm oil hybrid plasticizer. Polym Eng Sci 56:1169–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zakaria Z, Islam MS, Hassan A, Haafiz MKM, Arjmandi R, Inuwa IM et al (2013) Mechanical properties and morphological characterization of PLA/chitosan/epoxidized natural rubber composites. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2013:629092.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/629092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pilla S, Gong S, O’Neill E, Rowell RM, Krzysik AM (2008) Polylactide-pine wood flour composites. Polym Eng Sci 48:578–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xue B, Ye J, Zhang J (2015) Highly conductive poly(L-lactic acid) composites obtained via in situ expansion of graphite. J Polym Res 22(112).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-015-0755-x
  15. 15.
    Lizundia E, Oleaga A, Salazar A, Sarasua JR (2012) Nano- and microstructural effects on thermal properties of poly(L-lactide)/multi-wall carbon nanotube composites. Polymer 53:2412–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sullivan EM, Gerhardt RA, Wang B, Kalaitzidou K (2016) Effect of compounding method and processing conditions on the electrical response of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet/polylactic acid nanocomposite films. J Mater Sci 51:2980–2990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Lebedev
    • 1
  • O. S. Gefle
    • 1
  • E. T. Amitov
    • 1
  • D. V. Zhuravlev
    • 1
  • D. Y. Berchuk
    • 1
  • E. A. Mikutskiy
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations