Study on the influence of the grinding chatter on the workpiece’s microstructure transformation

  • Cong Sun
  • Zhenxin Liu
  • Dongxue Lan
  • Jinchao Duan
  • Shichao Xiu
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Grinding chatter is a kind of self-excited vibration which does not need external motivation. However, the internal motivation exists in the form of the grinding force. The grinding force is time-varying due to the regeneration effects between the grinding wheel and the workpiece. Generally, the chatter strength is reflected by the grinding force, which affects the distribution of the grinding temperature field by adjusting the heat flux. Moreover, the dynamic temperature generated within the grinding area is applied to cause the materials microstructure transformation of the workpiece’s surface. Consequently, the materials microstructure transformation of the workpiece’s surface is affected by the grinding chatter as well. In order to investigate the relationship between the material microstructure transformation and the chatter strength, a new hybrid model which combines the finite difference method (FDM) and the cellular automaton (CA) method is established accordingly. Coupled by the chatter factor, the FDM verified by the Jager theory model is applied to obtain the distribution of the dynamic grinding temperature field. It can be proved that the grinding temperature goes up with the increase of the grinding chatter. Combined with the dynamic temperature field, the CA model is firstly applied to simulate the austenization which includes the nucleation, growth, grain coarsening, and carbon diffusion process. The results indicate that the grain size expands with the increase of the grinding chatter, which results in the low mechanical properties of the material. Then, the martensite’s nucleation with the grinding chatter started in the calculated austenite microstructure. Afterwards, the martensite with the grinding chatter grows up in the calculated austensite microstructure. From the experiment and the simulation, it can be concluded that the martensite content decreases with the increase of the grinding chatter. According to the above conclusions, it proves that better mechanical properties can be obtained by wakening the impact of the grinding chatter.

Keywords

Grinding chatter Grinding force Temperature field Microstructure transformation Cellular automata Austenization Martensite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ding Z, Li B, Shao Y, Liang SY (2015) Phase transition at high heating rate and strain rate during maraging steel C250 grinding. Mater Manuf Process 31(13)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fergani O, Shao Y, Lazoglu I, Liang SY (2014) Temperature effects on grinding residual stress. Procedia CIRP 14:2–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oliveira JFG, Silva EJ, Guo C, Hashimoto F (2009) Industrial challenges in grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(2):663–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shao Y, Li B, Chiang KN, Liang SY (2015) Physics-based analysis of minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(9–12):1–12Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yan Y, Xu J, Wiercigroch M (2014) Non-linear analysis and quench control of chatter in plunge grinding. Int J Non Linear Mech 70:134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang J, Ge P, Jen TC, Zhang L (2009) Experimental and numerical studies of AISI1020 steel in grind-hardening. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52(3–4):787–795CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu Z, Payre G (2007) Stability analysis of doubly regenerative cylindrical grinding process. J Sound Vib 301(3–5):950–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Altintas Y, Weck M (2004) Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(2):619–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foeckerer T, Zaeh M, Zhang OB (2013) A three-dimensional analytical model to predict the thermo-metallurgical effects within the surface layer during grinding and grind-hardening. Int J Heat Mass Transf 56(1):223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaeger JC (1942) Moving sources of heat and the temperature of sliding contacts. J Procroysocnew South Wales 76Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wen LK, Lin JF (2006) General temperature rise solution for a moving plane heat source problem in surface grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31(3):268–277Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen B, Shih AJ, Xiao G (2011) A heat transfer model based on finite difference method for grinding. J Manuf Sci Eng 133(3):031001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X, Yu T, Sun X, Shi Y, Wang W (2016) Study of 3D grinding temperature field based on finite difference method: considering machining parameters and energy partition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(5):915–927Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zarudi I, Zhang LC (2002) Modelling the structure changes in quenchable steel subjected to grinding. J Mater Sci 37(20):4333–4341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen T, Zarudi I, Zhang LC (2007) Grinding-hardening with liquid nitrogen: mechanisms and technology. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47(1):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shi X, Xiu S, Zhang X, Wang Y (2016) A study of PSHG and its characteristic mechanism of residual stress within a hardened layer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(1–4):1–15Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen F, Cui Z, Liu J, Zhang X, Chen W (2009) Modeling and simulation on dynamic recrystallization of 30Cr2Ni4MoV rotor steel using the cellular automaton method. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17(7):075015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Su B, Han Z, Zhao Y, Shen B, Xu E, Huang S, Liu B (2014) Numerical simulation of microstructure evolution of heavy steel casting in casting and heat treatment processes. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn 54(2):408–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Su B, Han ZQ, Liu BC, Zhao YR, Shen BZ, Zhang LZ (2012) Numerical simulation on austenitization of cast steel during heating process, p 2080Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang B, Hattiangadi A, Li W, Zhou G, McGreevy T (2010) Simulation of steel microstructure evolution during induction heating. Mater Sci Eng A 527(12):2978–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu B, Zhang Y, Wang C, Liu PX, Liang WK, Li J (2014) Modeling of the austenitization of ultra-high strength steel with cellular automation method. Metall Mater Trans A 45(7):3161–3171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2255-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Su B, Han Z, Liu B (2013) Cellular automaton modeling of austenite nucleation and growth in hypoeutectoid steel during heating process. ISIJ Int 53(3):527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghassemi-Armaki H, Maaß R, Bhat SP, Sriram S, Greer JR, Kumar KS (2014) Deformation response of ferrite and martensite in a dual-phase steel. Acta Mater 62(1):197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhi Y, Liu WJ, Liu XH (2014) Simulation of martensitic transformation of high strength and elongation steel by cellular automaton. In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ, pp 235–238Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sherman DH, Yang BJ, Catalina AV, Hattiangadi AA, Zhao P, Chuzhoy L, Johnson ML (2007) Modeling of microstructure evolution of athermal transformation of lath martensite. In: Materials science forum. Trans Tech Publ, pp 4795–4800Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sun C, Niu Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Xiu S (2017) Study on the surface topography considering grinding chatter based on dynamics and reliability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–14Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yuan L, Keskinen E, Järvenpää V (2005) Stability analysis of roll grinding system with double time delay effects. In: IUTAM Symposium on Vibration Control of Nonlinear Mechanisms and Structures. Springer, pp 375–387Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chung K-W, Liu Z (2011) Nonlinear analysis of chatter vibration in a cylindrical transverse grinding process with two time delays using a nonlinear time transformation method. Nonlinear Dyn 66(4):441–456.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9924-y MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malkin S (1989) Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives. SMEGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC, Feshbach H (1962) Conduction of heat in solids. Phys Today 15(11):74–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Des Ruisseaux NR, Zerkle R (1970) Thermal analysis of the grinding process. J Eng Ind 92(2):428–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang D, Li C, Zhang Y, Jia D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental research on the energy ratio coefficient and specific grinding energy in nanoparticle jet MQL grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5–8):1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li BM, Zhao B (2003) Modern grinding technology. China Machin PressGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Halder C, Bachniak D, Madej L, Chakraborti N, Pietrzyk M (2015) Sensitivity analysis of the finite difference 2-D cellular automata model for phase transformation during heating. ISIJ Int 55(1):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao C, Wang P, Xing M (2017) Research on the matching of fastener stiffness based on wheel-rail contact mechanism for prevention of rail corrugation. Math Probl Eng 2017Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Polycarpou AA (2005) Measurement and modeling of normal contact stiffness and contact damping at the meso scale. J Vib Acoust 127(1):52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Halder C, Madej L, Pietrzyk M (2014) Discrete micro-scale cellular automata model for modelling phase transformation during heating of dual phase steels. Arch Civil Mech Eng 14(1):96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang B, Chuzhoy L, Johnson M (2007) Modeling of reaustenitization of hypoeutectoid steels with cellular automaton method. Comput Mater Sci 41(2):186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Demirel M, Kuprat A, George D, Rollett A (2003) Bridging simulations and experiments in microstructure evolution. Phys Rev Lett 90(1):016106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    El-Raghy T, Barsoum MW, Zavaliangos A, Kalidindi SR (2010) Processing and mechanical properties of Ti3SiC2: II, effect of grain size and deformation temperature. J Am Ceram Soc 82(10):2855–2860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kubin LP (1982) Reviews on the deformation behavior of materials reviews on the deformation behavior of materials. 4(3):181–275Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Orr RL, Chipman J (1967) Thermodynamic functions of ironGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fisher JC, Hollomon JH, Turnbull D (1948) Nucleation. J Appl Phys 19(8):775–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Basinski ZS, Christian JW (1954) Crystallography of deformation by twin boundary movements in indium-thallium alloys. Acta Metall 2(1):101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Denis S, Sjöström S, Simon A (1987) Coupled temperature, stress, phase transformation calculation. Metall Mater Trans A 18(7):1203–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Olson GB (1995) Opportunities in martensite theory. J Phys IV 05(C8):C8-31–C38-40Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hattiangadi A, Cai J, Chuzhoy L, Johnson ML (2006) Prediction of residual stress and damage distribution using explicit microstructure level simulation of martensitic transformationGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muhamad R, Ali MSM, Oehlers DJ, Griffith M (2012) The tension stiffening mechanism in reinforced concrete prisms. Adv Struct Eng 15(12):2053–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bischoff PH (2003) Tension stiffening and cracking of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 15(2):174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cong Sun
    • 1
  • Zhenxin Liu
    • 1
  • Dongxue Lan
    • 1
  • Jinchao Duan
    • 1
  • Shichao Xiu
    • 1
  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations