Advertisement

A comprehensive review of finite element modeling of orthogonal machining process: chip formation and surface integrity predictions

  • Morteza Sadeghifar
  • Ramin Sedaghati
  • Walid Jomaa
  • Victor Songmene
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Finite Element (FE) modeling of machining processes has received growing attention over the last two decades. Since machining processes operate at severe deformation conditions, involving very high strain, strain rate, stress, and temperature, the modeling procedure is still a challenging task even with new advanced software and computers. Therefore, most of the published research works were mainly performed for the simplest configuration of machining known as orthogonal cutting, in which a plane strain deformation state is assumed. This configuration leads to reducing the number of elements in the FE model and the computational time of the solution, compared to conventional machining processes (turning, milling, and drilling). Nevertheless, FE modeling of orthogonal turning is still considered as an open-ended subject as most of the phenomena involved in the orthogonal turning process, which also exist in other machining operations, are not fully well understood. The present review article deals with finite element modeling of orthogonal machining process. The paper consists of several related parts. First, the fundamentals of the FE simulation of orthogonal turning process are briefly described. Then, a detailed review on the FE prediction of machining characteristics including chip morphology, cutting forces, cutting temperature, tool wear, and burr formation is provided. Also, the FE prediction of surface integrity characteristics including residual stresses and microstructural changes is discussed. The influence of input model and parameters including thermal, material, and frictional models as well as size and arrangement of elements on machining and surface integrity characteristics are explained as well. Both technical and statistical aspects of the FE simulation of orthogonal turning are treated. Since there is no review paper thoroughly and specifically discussing the methods and findings of the finite element simulation of turning operations, the present article can be used as a reference for researchers who are active and/or interested in this filed.

Keywords

Finite element modeling Metal cutting Machinability Surface integrity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Consortium de Recherche et d’Innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec (CRIAQ), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and specially, the companies Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) and Héroux-Devtek Inc. (HD) for funding this review study, which was conducted as a part of the industrial project CRIAQ MANU510: Machining Effects on Part Integrity and Life of Aircraft Materials.

References

  1. 1.
    Jomaa W (2015) Contributions to understanding the high speed machining effects on aeronautic part surface integrity, École de technologie supérieure, Canada, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ozel T, Altan T (2000) Determination of workpiece flow stress and friction at the chip-tool contact for high-speed cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:133–152Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guo YB, Wen Q, Woodbury KA (2006) Dynamic material behavior modeling using internal state variable plasticity and its application in hard machining simulations. J Manuf Sci Eng 128:749–759Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Outeiro JC, Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R (2006) Experimental and numerical modeling of the residual stresses induced in orthogonal cutting of AISI 316L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1786–1794Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Umbrello D (2008) Finite element simulation of conventional and high speed machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 196:79–87Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kountanya R, Al-Zkeri I, Altan T (2009) Effect of tool edge geometry and cutting conditions on experimental and simulated chip morphology in orthogonal hard turning of 100Cr6 steel. J Mater Process Technol 209:5068–5076Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davim JP, Maranhao C, Faria P, Abrao A, Rubio JC, Silva LR (2009) Precision radial turning of AISI D2 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:842–849Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang F, Li J, Sun J, Zhang S, Wang Z, Yan L (2010) Al7050-T7451 turning simulation based on the modified power-law material model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:871–880Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arrazola PJ, Ozel T (2010) Investigations on the effects of friction modeling in finite element simulation of machining. Int J Mech Sci 52:31–42Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ucun I, Aslantas K (2011) Numerical simulation of orthogonal machining process using multilayer and single-layer coated tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:899–910Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moussa NB, Sidhom H, Braham C (2012) Numerical and experimental analysis of residual stress and plastic strain distributions in machined stainless steel. Int J Mech Sci 64:82–93Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang F, Yan L, Rong Y (2013) Orthogonal cutting of hardened AISI D2 steel with TiAlN-coated inserts—simulations and experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:1555–1563Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atlati S, Haddag B, Nouari M, Zenasni M (2014) Thermomechanical modeling of the tool-work material interface in machining and its implementation using the ABAQUS VUINTER subroutine. Int J Mech Sci 87:102–117Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daoud M, Jomaa W, Chatelain JF, Bouzid A (2015) A machining-based methodology to identify material constitutive law for finite element simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:2019–2033Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nasr MNA (2015) Effects of sequential cuts on residual stresses when orthogonal cutting steel AISI 1045, in: 15th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operations. Procedia CIRP 31:118–123Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akbar F, Matienga PT, Sheikh MA (2010) An experimental and coupled thermo-mechanical finite element study of heat partition effects in machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:491–507Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raczy A, Elmadagli M, Altenhof WJ, Alpas AT (2004) An Eulerian finite-element model for determination of deformation state of a copper subjected to orthogonal cutting. Metall Mater Trans A 35A:2393–2400Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bil H, Kılıc SE, Tekkaya AE (2004) A comparison of orthogonal cutting data from experiments with three different finite element models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:933–944Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Filice L, Micari F, Rizzuti S, Umbrello D (2007) A critical analysis on the friction modeling in orthogonal machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:709–714Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramesh A, Melkote SN (2008) Modeling of white layer formation under thermally dominant conditions in orthogonal machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:402–414Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mabrouki T, Girardin F, Asad M, Rigal JF (2008) Numerical and experimental study of dry cutting for an aeronautic aluminium alloy (A2024-T351). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1187–1197Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Subbiah S, Melkote SN (2008) Effect of finite edge radius on ductile fracture ahead of the cutting tool edge in micro-cutting of Al2024-T3. Mater Sci Eng A 474:283–300Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ranganath S, Guo C, Hegde P (2009) A finite element modeling approach to predicting white layer formation in nickel superalloys. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:77–80Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Zkeri I, Rech J, Altan T, Hamdi H, Valiorgue F (2009) Optimization of the cutting edge geometry of coated carbide tools in dry turning of steels using a finite element analysis. Mach Sci Technol 13:36–51Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lorentzon J, Järvstrat N, Josefson BL (2009) Modeling chip formation of alloy 718. J Mater Process Technol 209:4645–4653Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mohammadpour M, Razfar MR, Jalili Saffar R (2010) Numerical investigating the effect of machining parameters on residual stresses in orthogonal cutting. Simul Model Pract Theory 18:378–389Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muñoz-Sanchez A, Canteli JA, Cantero JL, Miguélez MH (2011) Numerical analysis of the tool wear effect in the machining induced residual stresses. Simul Model Pract Theory 19:872–886Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tang ZT, Liu ZQ, Pan YZ, Wan Y, Ai X (2009) The influence of tool flank wear on residual stresses induced by milling aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol 209:4502–4508Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tang DW, Wang CY, Hu YN, Song YX (2009) Finite-element simulation of conventional and high-speed peripheral milling of hardened mold steel. Metall Mater Trans A 40:3245–3257Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang B, Liu Z (2014) Investigations on the chip formation mechanism and shear localization sensitivity of high-speed machining Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:1065–1076Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bagci E, Ozcelik B (2006) Finite element and experimental investigation of temperature changes on a twist drill in sequential dry drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:680–687Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Matsumura T, Tamura S (2015) Cutting simulation of titanium alloy drilling with energy analysis and FEM. In: 15th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operations, Procedia CIRP 31:252–557Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eck S, Ganser HP, Marsoner S, Ecker W (2015) Error analysis for finite element simulation of orthogonal cutting and its validation via quick stop experiments. Mach Sci Technol 19:460–478Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Markopoulos AP (2013) Finite element method in machining processes, 1st ed. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shet C, Deng X (2000) Finite element analysis of the orthogonal metal cutting process. J Mater Process Technol 105:95–109Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Park IW, Dornfeld A (2000) A study of burr formation processes using the finite element method: part I. J Eng Mater Technol 122:221–228Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu CR, Guo YB (2000) Finite element analysis of the effect of sequential cuts and tool-chip friction on residual stresses in a machined layer. Int J Mech Sci 42:1069–1086zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mamalis AG, Horvath M, Branis AS, Manolakos DE (2001) Finite element simulation of chip formation in orthogonal metal cutting. J Mater Process Technol 110:19–27Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu HY, Lee WB, Cheung CF, S. To, Chen YP (2005) Computer simulation of single-point diamond turning using finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 167:549–554Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rhim SH, Oh SI (2006) Prediction of serrated chip formation in metal cutting process with new flow stress model for AISI 1045 steel. J Mater Process Technol 171:417–422Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Xie L-J, Schmidt J, Schmidt C, Biesinger F (2005) 2D FEM estimate of tool wear in turning operation. Wear 258:1479–1490Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Umbrello D, Hua J, Shivpuri R (2004) Hardness-based flow stress and fracture models for numerical simulation of hard machining of AISI 52100 bearing steel. Mater Sci Eng A 374:90–100Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hua J, Shivpuri R, Cheng X, Bedekar V, Matsumoto Y, Hashimoto F, Watkins TR (2005) Effect of feed rate, workpiece hardness and cutting edge on subsurface residual stress in the hard turning of bearing steel using chamfer+hone cutting edge geometry. Mater Sci Eng A 394:238–248Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    MacGinley T, Monaghan J (2001) Modeling the orthogonal machining process using coated cemented carbide cutting tools. J Mater Process Technol 118:293–300Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shi G, Deng X, Shet C (2002) A finite element study of the effect of friction in orthogonal metal cutting. Finite Elem Anal Des 38:863–883zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yen YC, Jain A, Altan T (2004) A finite element analysis of orthogonal machining using different tool edge geometries. J Mater Process Technol 146:72–81Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guo YB, Yen DW (2004) A FEM study on mechanisms of discontinuous chip formation in hard machining. J Mater Process Technol 155-156:1350–1356Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barge M, Hamdi H, Rech J, Bergheau J-M (2005) Numerical modeling of orthogonal cutting: influence of numerical parameters. J Mater Process Technol 164-165:1148–1153Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Salio M, Berruti T, De Poli G (2006) Prediction of residual stress distribution after turning in turbine disks. Int J Mech Sci 48:976–984Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sartkulvanich P, Altan T, Gocmen A (2007) Effects of flow stress and friction models in finite element simulation of orthogonal cutting—a sensitivity analysis. Mach Sci Technol 9:1–26Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu K, Melkote SN (2007) Finite element analysis of the influence of tool edge radius on size effect in orthogonal micro-cutting process. Int J Mech Sci 49:650–660Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hortig C, Svendsen B (2007) Simulation of chip formation during high-speed cutting. J Mater Process Technol 186:66–76Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Woon KS, Rahman M, Fang FZ, Neo KS, Liu K (2008) Investigations of tool edge radius effect in micromachining: a FEM simulation approach. J Mater Process Technol 195:204–211Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2008) A new material model for 2D numerical simulation of serrated chip formation when machining titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:275–288Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Khalili K, Safaei M (2009) FEM analysis of edge preparation for chamfered tools. Int J Mater Form 2:217–224Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Deng WJ, Xia W, Tang Y (2009) Finite element simulation for burr formation near the exit of orthogonal cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:1035–1045Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sima M, Ozel T (2010) Modified material constitutive models for serrated chip formation simulations and experimental validation in machining of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:943–960Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2010) Numerical simulation of titanium alloy dry machining with a strain softening constitutive law. Mach Sci Technol 14:244–257Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Calamaz M, Coupard D, Nouari M, Girot F (2011) Numerical analysis of chip formation and shear localization processes in machining the Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:887–895Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Long Y, Guo C (2012) Finite element modeling of burr formation in orthogonal cutting. Mach Sci Technol 16:321–336Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Klocke F, Lung D, Buchkremer S, Jawahir IS (2013) From orthogonal cutting experiments towards easy-to-implement and accurate flow stress data. Mater Manuf Process 28:1222–1227Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Reddy Paturi UM, Reddy Narala SK, Singh Pundir R (2014) Constitutive flow stress formulation, model validation and FE cutting simulation for AA7075-T6 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 605:176–185Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Menezes PL, Avdeev IV, Lovell MR, Higgs CF III (2014) An explicit finite element model to study the influence of rake angle and friction during orthogonal metal cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:875–885Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pres P, Skoczyński W, Jaśkiewicz K (2014) Research and modeling workpiece edge formation process during orthogonal cutting. Arch Civil Mech Eng 14:622–635Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jomaa W, Daoud M, Songmene V, Bocher P, Châtelain JF(2014) Identification and validation of Marusich’s constitutive law for finite element modeling of high speed, In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE2014, Montreal, QC, Canada, November 14-20Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ozel T (2006) The influence of friction models on finite element simulations of machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:518–530Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nasr MNA, Ng E-G, Elbestawi MA (2008) A modified time-efficient FE approach for predicting machining-induced residual stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:149–161Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bonnet C, Valiorgue F, Rech J, Hamdi H (2008) Improvement of the numerical modeling in orthogonal dry cutting of an AISI316L stainless steel by the introduction of a new friction model. J Mater Process Technol 1:114–118Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ducobu F, Rivière-Lorphèvre E, Filippi E (2014) Numerical contribution to the comprehension of saw-toothed Ti6Al4V chip formation in orthogonal cutting. Int J Mech Sci 81:77–87Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ducobu F, Rivière-Lorphèvre E, Filippi E (2015) On the introduction of adaptive mass scaling in a finite element model of Ti6Al4V orthogonal cutting. Simul Model Pract Theory 53:1–14Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Coelho RT, Ng EG, Elbestawi MA (2007) Tool wear when turning hardened AISI 4340 with coated PCBN tools using finishing cutting conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:263–272Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Marusich TD, Usui S, McDaniel RJ (2003) Three-dimensional finite element prediction of machining-induced stresses, In: Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE2003, Washington, DC, USA, November 15-21Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Haddag B, Atlati S, Nouari M, Zenasni M (2015) Analysis of the heat transfer at the tool-workpiece interface in machining: determination of heat generation and heat transfer coefficients. Heat Mass Transf 51:1355–1370Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Movahhedy MR, Gadala MS, Altintas Y (2000) Simulation of chip formation in orthogonal metal cutting process: an ALE finite element approach. Mach Sci Technol 4:15–42Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Fang G, Zeng P (2005) Three-dimensional thermos-elastic-plastic coupled FEM simulations for metal oblique cutting processes. J Mater Process Technol 168:42–48Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands, Vol 21, pp 541–547Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zerilli FJ, Armstrong RW (1987) Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations. J Appl Phys 61:1816–1825Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Maekawa K, Shirakashi T, Usui E (1983) Flow stress of low carbon steel at high temperature and strain rate (part 2)—flow stress under variable temperature and variable strain rate. B Jpn Soc Prec Eng 17:167–172Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Oxley P, Hastings W (1977) Predicting the strain rate in the zone of intense shear in which the chip is formed in machining from the dynamic flow stress properties of the work material and the cutting conditions. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 356:395–410Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Marusich T, Ortiz M (1995) Modeling and simulation of high-speed machining. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38:3675–3694zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Nasr MNA (2007) On modeling of machining-induced residual stresses, McMaster University, Canada, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lorong P, Yvonnet J, Coffignal G, Cohen S (2006) Contribution of computational mechanics in numerical simulation of machining and blanking: state-of-the-art. Arch Comput Meth Eng 13:45–90zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ee KC, Dillon Jr OW, Jawahir IS (2005) Finite element modeling of residual stresses in machining induced by cutting using a tool with finite edge radius. Int J Mech Sci 47:1611–1628zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Guo YB, Liu CR (2002) 3D FEA modeling of hard turning. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:189–199Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Guo YB, Liu CR (2002) FEM analysis of mechanical state on sequentially machined surfaces. Mach Sci Technol 6:21–41Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Strenkowski JS, Carroll JT (1985) A finite element model of orthogonal metal cutting. J Eng Ind 107:349–354Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Movahhedy M, Gadala MS, Altintas Y (2000) Simulation of the orthogonal metal cutting process using an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite-element method. J Mater Process Technol 103:267–275Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ozel T, Zeren E (2007) Finite element modeling the influence of edge roundness on the stress and temperature fields induced by high-speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:255–267Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Shi J, Liu CR (2005) The influence of material models on finite element simulation of machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 126:849–857Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Fang N, Wu Q (2009) A comparative study of the cutting forces in high speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 718 with a round cutting edge tool. J Mater Process Technol 209:4385–4389Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Daoud M, Chatelain JF, Bouzid A (2015) Effect of rake angle on Johnson-Cook material constants and their impact on cutting process parameters of Al2024-T3 alloy machining simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:1987–1997Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Vaziri MR, Salimi M, Mashayekhi M (2011) Evaluation of chip formation simulation models for material separation in the presence of damage models. Simul Model Pract Theory 19:718–733Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Grzesik W, Bartoszuk M, Nieslony P (2005) Finite element modeling of temperature distribution in the cutting zone in turning processes with differently coated tools. J Mater Process Technol 164-165:1204–1211Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Nasr MNA, Ng E-G, Elbestawi MA (2007) Modeling the effects of tool-edge radius on residual stresses when orthogonal cutting AISI 316L. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:401–411Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Nasr MNA, Ng E-G, Elbestawi MA (2007) Effects of strain hardening and initial yield strength on machining-induced residual stresses. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 129:567–579Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sadeghifar M, Sedaghati R, Songmene V (2016) FE modeling and optimization of cutting temperature in orthogonal turning. In: 24th International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ICTAM), Montreal, Canada, August 21–26Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ozel T, Zeren E (2005) Finite element modeling of stresses induced by high speed machining with round edge cutting tools. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE2005, Orlando, FL, USA, November 5-11Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R, Outeiro JC (2007) The influence of Johnson-Cook material constants on finite element simulation of machining of AISI 316L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:462–470Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Xi Y, Bermingham M, Wang G, Dargusch M (2013) Finite element modeling of cutting force and chip formation during thermally assisted machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. J Manuf Sci Eng 135:061014–061011 9Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Issa M, Labergere C, Saanouni K, Rassineux A (2012) Numerical prediction of thermomechanical field localization in orthogonal cutting. J Manuf Sci Technol 5:175–195Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Klocke F, Raedt H-W, Hoppe S (2001) 2D-FEM simulation of the orthogonal high speed cutting process. Mach Sci Technol 5:323–340Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Doege E, Meyer-Nnolkemper H, Saeed I (1986) Fließkurvenatlas metallischer Werkstoffe. Hanser-Verlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sun S, Brandt M, Dargusch M (2009) Characteristics of cutting forces and chip formation in machining of titanium alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:561–568Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Baker M (2006) Finite element simulation of high-speed cutting forces. J Mater Process Technol 176:117–126Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Nordgren A, Zargari Samani B, M’Saoubi R (2014) Experimental study and modeling of plastic deformation of cemented carbide tools in turning. In: 6th CIRP International Conference on High Performance Cutting (HPC2014), Procedia CIRP 14:599–604Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Abukhshim NA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2004) An investigation of the tool-chip contact length and wear in high-speed turning of EN19 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 218:889–903Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Haglund AJ, Kishawy HA, Rogers RJ (2008) An exploration of friction models for the chip-tool interface using an Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element model. Wear 265:452–460Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Maranhao C, Paulo Davim J (2010) Finite element modeling of machining of AISI 316 steel: numerical simulation and experimental validation. Simul Model Pract Theory 18:139–156Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Klocke F, Rizzuti S, Frank P, Gerschwiler K, Lung D, Settineri L (2010) Experimental and numerical investigation on the delamination behaviour of PVD-coated tools in turning of austenitic steel. Int J Mater Form 3:435–438Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    El-Wardany TI, Kishawy HA, Elbestawi MA (2000) Surface integrity of die material in high speed hard machining, part 2: microhardness variations and residual stresses. J Manuf Sci Eng 122:632–641Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Qian L, Hossan MR (2007) Effect on cutting force in turning hardened tool steels with cubic boron nitride inserts. J Mater Process Technol 191:274–278Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Yen Y-C, Jain A, Chigurupati P, Wu W-T, Altan T (2004) Computer simulation of orthogonal cutting using a tool with multiple coatings. Mach Sci Technol 8:305–326Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Jomaa W, Songmene V, Bocher P (2016) An hybrid approach based on machining and dynamic tests data for the identification of material constitutive equations. J Mater Eng Perform 25:1010–1027Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Ceretti E, Attanasio A, Giardini C, Filice L, Rizzuti S, Umbrello D (2008) Evaluation of accuracy in 2D and 3D simulation of orthogonal cutting processes. In: Proceedings of 11th CIRP Conference on modeling of machining operationsGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Majumdar P, Jayaramachandran R, Ganesan S (2005) Finite element analysis of temperature rise in metal cutting processes. Appl Therm Eng 25:2152–2168Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Filice L, Umbrello D, Micari F, Settineri L (2005) On the finite element simulation of thermal phenomena in machining processes. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ESAFORM Conference, 729–732Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Tang L, Huang J, Xie L (2011) Finite element modeling and simulation in dry hard orthogonal cutting AISI D2 tool steel with CBN cutting tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:1167–1181Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Rech J, Kusiak A, Battaglia JL (2004) Tribological and thermal functions of cutting tool coatings. Surf Coat Tech 186:364–371Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Grzesik W, Nieslony P (2004) Physics based modeling of interface temperatures in machining with multilayer coated tools at moderate cutting speeds. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:889–901Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Yen Y-C, Söhner J, Weule H, Schmidt J, Altan T (2002) Estimation of tool wear of carbide tool in orthogonal cutting using FEM simulation. Mach Sci Technol 6:467–486Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Gillespie L (1996) The battle of the burr: new strategies and new tricks. Manuf Eng 116:69–70Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Gillespie LK, Blotter PT (1976) The formation and properties of machining burrs. J Eng Ind 98:66–74Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Iwata K, Ueda K, Okuda K (1982) Study of mechanism of burrs formation in cutting based on direct SEM observation. J Jpn Soc Prec Eng 48:510–515Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Nakayama K, Arai M (1987) Burr formation in metal cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 36:33–36Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Park IW, Dornfeld A (2000) A study of burr formation processes using the finite element method: part II—the influences of exit angle, rake angle, and backup material on burr formation processes. J Eng Mater Technol 122:229–237Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Field M, Kahles JF (1964) The surface integrity of machined and ground high strength steels. DMIC Rep 2010:54Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Stenberg N, Proudian J (2013) Numerical modeling of turning to find residual stresses. In: 14th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operations (CIRP CMMO), Procedia CIRP 8:258–264Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Schulze V, Autenrieth H, Deuchert M, Weule H (2010) Investigation of surface near residual stress states after micro-cutting by finite element simulation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59:117–120Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Outeiro JC, Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R, Jawahir IS (2015) Evaluation of present numerical models for predicting metal cutting performance and residual stresses. Mach Sci Technol 19:183–216Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Outeiro JC, Ee KC, Dillon Jr OW, Wanigarathne PC, Jawahir IS (2006) Some observations on comparing the modelled and measured residual stresses on the machined surface induced by orthogonal cutting of AISI 316L steel. In: 9th CIRP International Workshop on Modeling of Machining Operations, Bled, Slovenia, may 11–12Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Pu Z, Umbrello D, Dillon Jr OW, Jawahir IS ((2014)) Finite element simulation of residual stresses in cryogenic machining of AZ31B Mg alloy. In: 2nd CIRP Conference on Surface Integrity (CSI), Procedia CIRP 13:282–287Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Field M, Kahles JF (1972) Review of surface integrity of machined components. CIRP Ann 20:153–162Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Ding H, Shen N, Shin YC (2011) Modeling of grain refinement in aluminum and copper subjected to cutting. Comput Mater Sci 50:3016–3025Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ding H, Shin YC (2012) A metallo-thermomechanically coupled analysis of orthogonal cutting of AISI 1045 steel. J Manuf Sci Eng 134:051014–051011 12Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Ljustina G, Larsson R, Fagerström M (2014) A FE based machining simulation methodology accounting for cast iron microstructure. Finite Elem Anal Des 80:1–10Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Jafarian F, Imaz Ciaran M, Umbrello D, Arrazola PJ, Filice L, Amirabadi H (2014) Finite element simulation of machining Inconel 718 alloy including microstructure changes. Int J Mech Sci 88:110–121Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Liu R, Salahshoor M, Melkote SN, Marusich T (2015) A unified material model including dislocation drag and its application to simulation of orthogonal cutting of OFHC copper. J Mater Process Technol 216:328–338Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Bammann DJ (1990) Modeling temperature and strain rate dependent large deformation of metals. Appl Mech Rev 43:312–319Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Bammann DJ, Chiesa ML, Johnson GC (1996) Modeling large deformation and failure in manufacturing process. In: 19th International Congress on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ICTAM), Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Chandrasekaran H, M’Saoubi R, Chazal H (2005) Modeling of material flow stress in chip formation process from orthogonal milling and split Hopkinson bar tests. Mach Sci Technol 9:131–145Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    M’Saoubi R (1998) Aspects Thermiques et Microstructuraux de la coupe. Application a` la coupe orthogonale des aciers auste´ nitiques, Ecole nationale supérieure d'arts et métiers, France, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Changeux B, Touratier M, Lebrun JL, Thomas T, Clisson J (2001) High-speed shear tests for the identification of the Johnson-Cook law. In: Fourth International ESAFORM Conference, Liege, Belgium, April 23–25,Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Tounsi N, Vincenti J, Otho A, Elbestawi MA (2002) From the basics of orthogonal metal cutting toward the identification of the constitutive equation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:1373–1383Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Chandrasekeran H, Kapoor DV (1965) Photoelastic analysis of tool-chip interface stress. J Eng Ind 87B:495–502Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Childs THC, Mahdi MI (1989) On the stress distribution between the chip and tool during metal turning. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 38:55–58Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Sartkulvanich J, Koppka F, Altan T (2004) Determination of flow stress for metal cutting simulation—a progress report. J Mater Process Technol 146:61–71Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Schulze V, Vohringer O (2000) Influence of alloying elements on the strain rate and temperature dependence of the flow stress of steels. Metall Mater Trans A 31:825–830Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Rhim SH, Oh SI (2002) Simulation of serrated chip formation in metal cutting process by using a new flow stress model. CIRP January Meeting, ParisGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Rhim SH, Oh SI (2003) Prediction of serrated chip formation in metal cutting process. In: US-Korea Workshop on Advance in Metallic Structural Materials, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Huang Y, Liang SY (2003) Cutting forces modeling considering the effect of tool thermal property-application to CBN hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:307–315Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, USAGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Lemaitre J (1984) How to use damage mechanics. Nucl Eng Des 80:233–245Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Kara F, Aslantas K, Cicek A (2016) Prediction of cutting temperature in orthogonal machining of AISI316L using artificial neural network. Appl Soft Comput 38:64–74Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Hua J, Umbrello D, Shivpuri R (2006) Investigation of cutting conditions and cutting edge preparations for enhanced compressive subsurface residual stress in the hard turning of bearing steel. J Mater Process Technol 171:180–187Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Sadeghifar M, Sedaghati R, Jomaa W, Songmene V (2018) Finite element analysis and response surface method for robust multi-performance optimization of radial turning of hard 300M steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:2457–2474Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Sadeghifar M (2017) Development of the analysis and optimization strategies for prediction of residual stresses induced by turning processes, Concordia University, Canada, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morteza Sadeghifar
    • 1
  • Ramin Sedaghati
    • 1
  • Walid Jomaa
    • 2
  • Victor Songmene
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Industrial, and Aerospace EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversité LavalQuebec cityCanada
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations