Low-carbon design of structural components by integrating material and structural optimization
- 19 Downloads
Mechanical parts, especially large mechanical structures, consume a lot of resources and energy in manufacturing stage and produce large amounts of carbon emissions. To reduce the carbon emissions of mechanical parts from the perspective of manufacturing system, an approach integrating structural optimization and material selection is studied. A hybrid optimization model for low-carbon design of mechanical parts is established. The objective function of the model is built by quantifying the carbon emissions of mechanical parts. To improve the efficiency of carbon emissions analysis, a new concept “variable carbon emission” is proposed to identify part of carbon emissions, the amount of which will change with design variables. In this paper, variable carbon emissions of mechanical parts are quantified and parameterized by the relevant parameters of design variables. Two types of design variables (material variable and structural variable) are included in the model. The qualitative constraints and quantitative constraints for the low-carbon design optimization are both taken into consideration. Furthermore, an integrated numerical solving method is used to search for the optimal design scheme considering the coupling among material and structural parameters in low-carbon design. It foresees the synergic use of finite element model (FEM) and several numerical solution algorithms. The low-carbon design of a hydraulic slider is given as an example to demonstrate the approach. The results show that the approach has good potential to be applied in the low-carbon design of mechanical parts even with complex structural features.
KeywordsLow-carbon design Variable carbon emissions Structural optimization Material selection Hydraulic slider
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.US Energy Information Administration (2017) US Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2016. https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/. Accessed 5 October 2017
- 2.US Energy Information Administration (2017) US energy flow, 2016. https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/flow/total_energy.pdf
- 3.International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14064- 1:2006 Greenhouse gases – Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. https://www.iso.org/standard/38381.html. Accessed 31 March 2006
- 4.BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, London. ISBN 978-0-580-71382-8Google Scholar
- 5.International Organization for Standardization (2013) ISO/TS 14067:2013 Greenhouse gases – Carbon footprint of products – Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. https://www.iso.org/standard/59521.html. Accessed 31 May 2013
- 10.International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principle and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html. Accessed 31 July 2006
- 11.International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html. Accessed 31 July 2006
- 18.Lu Q, Zhou G, Xiao Z, Chang F, Tian C (2017) A selection methodology of key parts based on the characteristic of carbon emissions for low-carbon design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0522-8
- 29.British Standards Institution (2011) Guide to PAS 2050-How to assess the carbon footprint of goods and services. https://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/faculty/hall/publications/PAS2050_Guide.pdf
- 30.ANSYS Inc. Adaptive Single-Objective Optimization (ASO). https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Ansys/15.0.7/en-us/help/wb_dx/dx_theory_KNLPQL.html. Accessed 15 June 2017
- 31.Zhou XY, Chen LP, Huang ZD (2007) The SIMP-SRV method for stiffness topology optimization of continuum structures. Int J CAD/CAM 7(1):66–80Google Scholar