Advertisement

Experimental and theoretical investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of a revolver barrel

  • Sahil Kajal
  • V. K. Jain
  • J. Ramkumar
  • Leeladhar NagdeveEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 213 Downloads

Abstract

Rifling is the process of making helical grooves inside the barrel of a firearm. It is done to provide the bullet with gyroscopic stability for optimum range and accuracy. After the machining process of rifling, the surface produced is uneven and hence finishing is required to reduce the surface roughness. Low value of surface roughness is critical which can otherwise decrease the muzzle velocity, range, and accuracy. High value of surface roughness can increase the friction heat loss leading to the overall low life of the barrel. It can also result in bullet material deposition inside the barrel leading to metal fouling which requires successive cleaning of the barrel. Surface finish influences functionality, efficiency, and output of the machined part. Magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) is a finishing process which uses magnetic field to accomplish finishing. In the present research work, the barrel of a 0.32 in. revolver was finished using MAF. The barrel had high and uneven surface roughness before finishing with Ra value varying from 600 to 900 nm. The input variable parameters were rotational speed, vertical reciprocation speed, working gap, abrasive mesh size, and abrasive volume percent. With the optimum finishing conditions, surface roughness value as low as 150 nm was achieved.

The finishing process was modeled theoretically by assuming an initial uniform surface profile with roughness peaks running circumferentially in the inner cylindrical surface with the abrasive particles cutting these peaks along a helical path. Theoretical finishing rate without the influence of rifling was compared with the experimental results, and the difference between them showed the effect of rifling on the finishing rate. The effect of rifling on the finishing rate was analyzed by using regression analysis.

Keywords

Revolver barrel Finishing Surface roughness Magnetic abrasive finishing Flexible magnetic abrasive brush 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very thankful of BASF, Germany for supplying CIPs of different grades for our research work. We thankfully acknowledge the help of staff members of Manufacturing Science Lab, IIT Kanpur for providing the facilities to fabricate the tool for finishing the revolver barrel and other attachments. This paper is a revised and expanded version of the paper entitled “Experimental Investigations into Internal Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Helical Grooves of a Revolver Barrel” by Sahil Kajal, V. K. Jain, J. Ramkumar, and Leeladhar Nagdeve, presented at the 6th International & 27th AIMTDR Conference (2016) held at College of Engineering, Pune, India, during 16–18 December 2016.

References

  1. 1.
    1978 Electrochemical machining of gun barrel bores and rifling, ‘A project of the manufacturing technology program, Naval Sea Systems Command’, Naval Ordnance Station, Louisville, Kentucky 40,214Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jain VK, Jha S (2005) Nano-finishing Techniques’. In: Mahalik NP (ed) Micro-manufacturing and Nano-Technology, Springer Verlag, pp. 171–195Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim J-D, Kang Y-H, Bae Y-H, Lee S-W (1997) Development of a magnetic abrasive jet machining syste precision internal polishing of circular tubes. J Mater Process Technol 71:384–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00103-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yamaguchi H, Shinmura T (2000) Study of an internal magnetic abrasive finishing using a pole rotation system. Discussion of the characteristic abrasive behavior. Precis Eng 24:237–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-6359(00)00037-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamaguchi H, Kang J, Hashimoto F (2011) Metastable austenitic stainless steel tool for magnetic abrasive finishing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60:339–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barletta M, Tagliaferri V (2006) Development of an abrasive jet machining system assisted by two fluidized beds for internal polishing of circular tubes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang Y, Hu D (2005) Study on the inner surface finishing of tubing by magnetic abrasive finishing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yin S, Shinmura T (2004) Vertical vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive finishing and deburring for magnesium alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1297–1303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2010) Nano-Finishing of Stainless-Steel Tubes Using Rotational Magnetorheological Abrasive Flow Finishing Process. Mach Sci Technol 14:365–389.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2010.511865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh DK, Jain VK, Raghuram V (2004) Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process. J Mater Process Technol 149:22–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh DK, Jain VK, Raghuram V, Komanduri R (2005) Analysis of surface texture generated by a flexible magnetic abrasive brush. Wear 259:1254–1261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jayswal SC, Jain VK, Dixit PM (2005a) Magnetic abrasive finishing process- A parametric analysis. J Adv Manuf Syst 4:131–150.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686705000655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jayswal SC, Jain VK, Dixit PM (2005b) Modeling and simulation of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:477–490.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2180-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Danish M, Ginta TL, Habib K, Carou D, Rani AMA, Saha BB (2017) Thermal analysis during turning of AZ31 magnesium alloy under dry and cryogenic conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2855–2868.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9893-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2008) Analysis of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:613–621.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1095-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jha S, Jain VK (2004) Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1019–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumaran SC, ShunmugamMS (2014) Study of Profile Changes in Magneto-Rheological Abrasive Honing By an Ingenious Relocation Technique, 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th–14th, 2014, IIT Guwahati, Assam, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mori T, Hirota K, Kawashima Y (2003) Clarification of magnetic abrasive finishing mechanism. J Mater Process Technol 143–144:682–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00410-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jha S, Jain VK, Komanduri R (2007) Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:725–729.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Du KJ, Choi MS (1995) Simulation for the prediction of surface-accuracy in magnetic abrasive machining. J Mater Process Technol 53:630–642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0924–0136(94)01753-N CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jain VK, Kumar P, Behera PK, Jayswal SC (2001) Effect of working gap and circumferential speed on the performance of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Wear 250–251:384–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00642-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    David JG (1999) Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd ed.’, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sidpara AM, Jain VK (2012) Theoretical analysis of forces in magneto rheological fluid based finishing process. Int J Mech Sci 56:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lt CDR Roy S Dutt (2009) Theoretical modeling on magnetic abrasive finishing process.Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barman Anwesa, Das M, Singh A (2014) Modeling and Simulation of Magnetic Field Assisted Finishing Process’, 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th–14th, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wani AM, Yadava V, Khatri A (2007) Simulation for the prediction of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive flow finishing (MAFF). J Mater Process Technol 190:282–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noordin MY, Venkatesh VC, Sharif S, Elting S (2004) Abdullah A (2004) Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. J Mater Process Technol 145:46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coppi R (2008) Management of uncertainty in Statistical Reasoning: The case of Regression Analysis. Int J Approx Reason 47:284–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.05.011 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sahil Kajal
    • 1
  • V. K. Jain
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Ramkumar
    • 1
  • Leeladhar Nagdeve
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKanpurIndia
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentM.A.N.I.TBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations