Toolpath generation and finishing of bio-titanium alloy using novel polishing tool in MFAF process

  • Anwesa Barman
  • Manas DasEmail author


Nanofinishing of biomaterials is a necessary process to lengthen the prosthetic life and performance. Here, Magnetic Field Assisted Finishing (MFAF) process is used to finish biomaterials in the nanometer level. MFAF process uses Magnetorheological (MR) fluid mixed with abrasive particles as the polishing medium. In this study, titanium is used as the workpiece material. A specially designed tool is used to carry out the nanofinishing process. Two types of path planning i.e. parallel and spiral tool path are adopted during finishing. The surface roughness and surface texture differ for each generated tool path. The surface roughness generated from each of the path planning processes is analyzed and it is found that parallel toolpath generates lowest surface roughness (~10 nm) with better surface texture than spiral toolpath. Hence, the parallel toolpath is considered as the optimum toolpath for finishing biomaterials in MFAF process. Experimental investigations using parallel tool path are carried out to explore the capability of the developed novel tool along with the determination of the optimum range of the process parameters to explore finishing capability. Preliminary experimental study shows that best surface finish and surface topography is achieved using 1200 rpm tool rotational speed, 1 mm working gap, and 6.30 h. finishing time.


Nano-finishing Biomaterials MR fluid Toolpath Permanent magnet 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Yan Y, Chibowski E, Szczees A (2017) Surface properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy part I: surface roughness and apparent surface free energy. Mater Sci Eng C 70:207–215. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Niinomi M (1998) Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 243:231–236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Polishetty A, Littlefair G, Praveen Kumar K (2014) Machinability assessment of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V for biomedical applications. Adv Mater Res 941–944:1985–1990. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang C, Liu W, Li S et al (2016) A nano-scale mirror-like surface of Ti–6Al–4V attained by chemical mechanical polishing. Chinese Phys B 25:58301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ozdemir Z, Ozdemir A, Basim GB (2016) Application of chemical mechanical polishing process on titanium based implants. Mater Sci Eng C 68:383–396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basim GB, Ozdemir Z, Mutlu O (2012) Biomaterials applications of chemical mechanical polishing. In: planarization/CMP Technol. (ICPT 2012), Int. Conf. VDE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishizawa K, Kurisu H, Yamamoto S et al (2008) Effect of chemical polishing in titanium materials for low outgassing. J Phys Conf Ser 100:92023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang P, Lai J, Han L et al (2016) Electropolishing of titanium alloy under hydrodynamic mode. Sci China Chem 59:1525–1528. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okada A, Uno Y, Yabushita N et al (2004) High efficient surface finishing of bio-titanium alloy by large-area electron beam irradiation. J Mater Process Technol 149:506–511. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim S-K, Cho Y-T, Jung Y-G (2013) Determination of efficient superfinishing conditions for mirror surface finishing of stainless steel. J Korean Soc Manuf Process Eng 12:100–106Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou K, Chen Y, Du ZW, Niu FL (2015) Surface integrity of titanium part by ultrasonic magnetic abrasive finishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:997–1005. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zeng S, Blunt L (2014) An experimental study on the correlation of polishing force and material removal for bonnet polishing of cobalt chrome alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:185–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jha S, Jain VK, Komanduri R (2007) Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:725–729. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jha S, Jain VK (2009) Rheological characterization of magnetorheological polishing fluid for MRAFF. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:656–668. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sidpara A, Jain VK (2012) Nano-level finishing of single crystal silicon blank using magnetorheological finishing process. Tribol Int 47:159–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barman A, Das M (2017) Design and fabrication of a novel polishing tool for finishing freeform surfaces in magnetic field assisted finishing (MFAF) process. Precis Eng 49:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geels K (2007) Metallographic and materialographic specimen preparation, light microscopy, image analysis, and hardness testing, 15th edn ASTM international CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stephen I, Jacobs D, Kordonski W, Victorovich I (1998) Magnetorheological fluid compositionGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sidpara A, Jain VK (2011) Effect of fluid composition on nanofinishing of single-crystal silicon by magnetic field-assisted finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:243–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marsden JE, Ratiu TS (1998) Introduction to mechanics and symmetry. Phys Today 48:70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIIT GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations