Advertisement

Investigations into the effect of process parameters on surface roughness and burr formation during micro end milling of TI-6AL-4V

  • K. Vipindas
  • B. KuriachenEmail author
  • Jose Mathew
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 304 Downloads

Abstract

As micromachining is finding a lot of applications in various fields such as biomedical, avionics, optics, and electronics, it is necessary to produce parts with good surface finish and minimum burr. In this paper, experimental investigations on the effect of spindle speed, feed and depth of cut on various responses such as surface roughness and top burr formation during the micro milling of Ti-6Al-4V with two different carbide tools with a diameter of 0.5 and 1 mm have been carried out. Three levels of cutting parameters with full factorial design were used for the experimentation. The burrs formed on the up milling side of the micro slot were analyzed in this study. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to analyze the burrs formed and was quantified in term of its kerf width. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to find the level of significance of cutting parameters on surface roughness and top burr formation. In addition, statistical predictive models were also developed to predict the responses in terms of cutting parameters. Finally, a cutting strategy was postulated to minimize the top burr in the micro end milling of a slot and was verified for a slot of 0.75-mm width.

Keywords

Micro milling Surface roughness Up milling Down milling ANOVA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kiswantoa G, Zariatina DL, Ko TJ (2014) The effect of spindle speed, feed-rate and machining time to the surface roughness and burr formation of aluminum alloy 1100 in micro-milling operation. J Manuf Process 16:435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aurich JC, Dornfeld D, Arrazola PJ, Franke V, Leitz L, Min S (2009) Burrs—analysis, control and removal. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 58:519–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim CJ, Mayor JR, Ni J (2004) A static model of chip formation in microscale milling. J Manuf Sci Eng 126:710–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yuan ZJ, Zhou M, Dong S (1996) Effect of diamond tool sharpness on minimum cutting thickness and cutting surface integrity in ultra-precision machining. J Mater Process Technol 62:327–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Son SM, Lim HS, Ahn JH (2005) Effects of the friction coefficient on the minimum cutting thickness in micro cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu K, Melkote SN (2007) Finite element analysis of the influence of tool edge radius on size effect in orthogonal micro-cutting process. Int J Mech Sci 49:650–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aramcharoen A, Mativenga PT (2009) Size effect and tool geometry in micromilling of tool steel. Precis Eng 33:402–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biermann D, Kahnis P (2010) Analysis and simulation of size effects in micromilling. Prod Eng Res Dev 4:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alauddin M, Baradie MAE, Hashmi MSJ (1995) Computer-aided analysis of a surface-roughness model for end milling. J Mater Process Technol 55:123–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Özel T, Thepsonthi T, Ulutan D, Kaftanoğlu B (2011) Experiments and finite element simulations on micro-milling of Ti–6Al–4V alloy with uncoated and cBN coated micro-tools. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 60:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang W, Kweon SH, Yang SH (2005) A study on roughness of the micro-end-milled surface produced by a miniatured machine tool. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jin CZ, Kang IS, Park JH, Jang SH, Kim JS (2009) The characteristics of cutting forces in the micro-milling of AISI D2 steel. J Mech Sci Technol 23:2823–2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shizuka H, Okuda K, Nunobiki M, Inada Y (2011) Study on surface roughness in micro end milling of mold material. Adv Mater Res 325:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Su Y, He N, Li L, Li XL (2006) An experimental investigation of effects of cooling/lubrication conditions on tool wear in high-speed end milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Wear 261:760–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tsuda K, Okuda K, Shizuka H, Nunobiki M (2011) A study of the micro-end milling of titanium alloy. Adv Mater Res 325:588–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Biermann, D, Steiner M (2012) Analysis of micro burr formation in austenitic stainless steel X5CrNi18–10. 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 97–102Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berestovskyi D, Hung WNP, Lomeli P (2014) Surface finish of ball-end milled microchannels. J Micro- Nano-Manuf 2:041005-1–041005-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vazquez E, Gomar J, Ciurana J, Rodríguez CA (2015) Analyzing effects of cooling and lubrication conditions in micromilling of Ti6Al4V. J Clean Prod 87:906–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2016) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 21:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghani JA, Choudhury IA, Hassan HH (2004) Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of end milling parameters. J Mater Process Technol 145:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vázquez E, Rodríguez CA, Elías-Zúñiga A, Ciurana J (2010) An experimental analysis of process parameters to manufacture metallic micro-channels by micro-milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51:945–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Campanelli SL, Casalino G, Contuzzi N (2013) Multi-objective optimization of laser milling of 5754 aluminum alloy. Opt Laser Technol 52:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leone C, Papa I, Tagliaferri F, Lopresto V (2013) Investigation of CFRP laser milling using a 30 W Q-switched Yb:YAG fiber laser: effect of process parameters on removal mechanisms and HAZ formation. Compos Part A 55:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B (2013) Multi-objective optimization using Taguchi based grey relational analysis for micro-milling of Al 7075 material with ball nose end mill. Measurement 46:1849–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Masmiati N, Sarhan AAD (2015) Optimizing cutting parameters in inclined end milling for minimum surface residual stress—Taguchi approach. Measurement 60:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Durakbasa MN, Akdogan A, Vanli AS, Bulutsuz AG (2015) Optimization of end milling parameters and determination of the effects of edge profile for high surface quality of AISI H13 steel by using precise and fast measurements. Measurement 68:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee K, Dornfeld DA (2005) Micro-burr formation and minimization through process control. Precis Eng 29:246–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park IW, Dornfeld DA (2000) A study of burr formation processes using the finite element method: part II—the influences of exit angle, rake angle, and backup material on burr formation processes. J Eng Mater Technol 122:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen MJ, Ni HB, Wang ZJ, Jiang Y (2012) Research on the modeling of burr formation process in micro-ball end milling operation on Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Olvera O, Barrow G (1998) Influence of exit angle and tool nose geometry on burr formation in face milling operations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt B 212:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hashimura M, Hassamontr J, Dornfeld DA (1999) Effect of in-plane exit angle and rake angles on burr height and thickness in face milling operation. J Manuf Sci Eng 121:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chern GL (2006) Experimental observation and analysis of burr formation mechanisms in face milling of aluminum alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1517–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saptaji K, Subbiah S, Dhupia JS (2012) Effect of side edge angle and effective rake angle on top burrs in micro-milling. Precis Eng 36:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lekkala R, Bajpai V, Singh RK, Joshi SS (2011) Characterization and modeling of burr formation in micro-end milling. Precis Eng 35:625–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mathai GK, Melkote SN, Rosen DW (2013) Effect of process parameters on burrs produced in micromilling of a thin nitinol foil. J Micro- Nano-Manuf 1:021005-1–021005-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chu CH, Dornfeld DA (2005) Geometric approaches for reducing burr formation in planar milling by avoiding tool exits. J Manuf Process 7(2):182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Montgomery DC, Runger GC (2004) Applied statistics and probability for engineers. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Department, NIT, CalicutCalicutIndia
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering Department, NIT, MizoramMizoramIndia

Personalised recommendations