Skip to main content
Log in

Vibration-based estimation of tool major flank wear in a turning process using ARMA models

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the correlation between vibrational features of tool/holder assembly and tool major flank wear in a turning process. During cutting, 3D tool acceleration signals are recorded by an accelerometer. Then, based on the dynamics of the tool/holder system that manifests itself in natural frequencies/modes, wear sensitive features are determined and derived from autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model of the recorded signals. After a comprehensive investigation of extracted features, dispersion ratio of natural modes, a correlation between the wear and features is found. Moreover, a metric calculated based on the system eigenvalues is introduced to find the distance between ARMA models of tool with different wear levels and the baseline model, as another wear-sensitive feature. Analysis of experimental results reveals that in the accelerating stage of wear, a change of vibration mode from second bending mode in the main cutting direction to the first bending mode in feed direction occurs, and simultaneously, the ARMA distance reaches a minimum value. This analysis provides a reliable algorithm for tool wear estimation since it directly originates from tool/holder system natural modes/frequencies and interprets the physical behaviour of the system in connection with the tool wear. Based on the results from dispersion analysis, the outputs of ARMA metric can also be used to provide reliable predictions for tool replacement policy. The method obtained here can be utilized for development of an online real-time tool wear estimation algorithm in turning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin KF (1994) A review by discussion of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 34(4):527–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghasempoor A, Moore TN, Jeswiet J (1998) On-line wear estimation using neural networks. Proc Ins Mech Eng – B 212:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pandit S and M Kashou S. (August 1982) A data dependent systems strategy of on-line tool wear sensing. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 104/217

  4. Liang S Y and Dornfeld D A. (August 1989) Tool wear detection using time series analysis of acoustic emission. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 111/199

  5. Jemielniak K, Kossakowska J, Urbanski T (2011) Application of wavelet transform of acoustic emission and cutting force signals for tool condition monitoring in rough turning of Inconel 625. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 225:123–129

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li X (2002) A brief review: acoustic emission method for tool wear monitoring during turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yao Y, Fang XD (1992) Modelling of multivariate time series for tool wear estimation in finish-turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 32(4):495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roth J T and Pandit S M. (November 1999) Monitoring end-mill wear and predicting tool failure using accelerometers. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 121/559

  9. Sick B (2002) Online and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: a review of more than a decade of research. Mech Syst Signal Process 16(4):487–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oraby SE, Hayhurst DR (2004) Tool life determination based on the measurement of wear and tool force ratio variation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1261–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rehorn Adam G, Jiang J, Orban PE (2005) State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:693–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Szecsi T (1999) A DC motor based cutting tool condition monitoring system. J Mater Process Technol 92–93:350–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Danai K, Ulsoy AG (1987) An adaptive observer for on-line tool wear estimation in turning. Part I: theory. Mech Syst Signal Proc l(2):211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Danai K, Ulsoy AG (1987) An adaptive observer for on-line tool wear estimation in turning. Part II: results. Mech Syst Signal Proc l(2):227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang SN, Tan KK, Wong YS et al (2007) Tool wear detection and fault diagnosis based on cutting force monitoring. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:444–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alonso FJ, Salgado DR (2008) Analysis of the structure of vibration signals for tool wear detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:735–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kilundu B, Dehombreux P, Chiementin X (2011) Tool wear monitoring by machine learning techniques and singular spectrum analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:400–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Wang W, Huang Y et al (2008) Design of neural network-based estimator for tool wear modelling in hard turning. J Intell Manuf 19:383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aliustaoglu C, Ertunc H, Ocak H (2009) Tool wear condition monitoring using a sensor fusion model based on fuzzy inference system. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Purushothaman S (2010) Tool wear monitoring using artificial neural network based on extended Kalman filter weight updation with transformed input patterns. J Intell Manuf 21:717–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma VS, Sharma SK, Sharma AK (2008) Cutting tool wear estimation for turning. J Intell Manuf 19:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srikant RR, Krishna PV, Rao ND (2011) Online tool wear prediction in wet machining using modified back propagation neural network. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 225:1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brezak D, Majetic D et al (2012) Tool wear estimation using an analytic fuzzy classifier and support vector machine. J Intell Manuf 23:797–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Penedo F, Haber R E, Gajate A and Del Toro R M. (November 2012) Hybrid incremental modeling based on least squares and fuzzy-NN for monitoring tool wear in turning processes. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, Vol. 8, No. 4.

  25. Leem C S, Dornfeld D A and Dreyfus S E. (May 1995) A customized neural network for sensor fusion in on-line monitoring of cutting tool wear. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 117/153

  26. Chen S L and Chang T H. (2001) Using a data fusion neural network in the tool wear monitoring of a computer numerical control turning machine. Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part B.

  27. Segreto T, Simeone A, Teti R (2012) Sensor fusion for tool state classification in nickel superalloy high performance cutting. Procedia CIRP 1:593–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Segreto T, Simeone A, Teti R (2013) Multiple sensor monitoring in nickel alloy turning for tool wear assessment via sensor fusion. Procedia CIRP 12:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Paul PS, Varadarajan AS (2012) A multi-sensor fusion model based on artificial neural network to predict tool wear during hard turning. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 226(5):853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jemielniak K, Urbanski T et al (2012) Tool condition monitoring based on numerous signal features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu TI, Song SD et al (2013) Online monitoring and measurements of tool wear for precision turning of stainless steel parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:1397–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Siddhpura A, Paurobally R (2013) A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:371–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin Richard J, (April 2000) A metric for ARMA processes, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 48, No. 4.

  34. De Cock K, De Moor B (2002) Subspace angles between ARMA models. Syst Control Lett 46(4):265–270

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng H, Mita A (2007) Damage indicator defined as the distance between ARMA models for structural health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit. doi:10.1002/stc.235

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pandit SM, Wu SM (1983) Time series and system analysis with applications. Wiley, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Ostasevicius V, Gaidys R, Rimkeviciene J, Dauksevicius R (2010) An approach based on tool mode control for surface roughness reduction in high-frequency vibration cutting. J Sound Vib 329:4866–4879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Remadna M, Rigal JF (2006) Evolution during time of tool wear and cutting forces in the case of hard turning with CBN inserts. J Mater Process Technol 178:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng K. (2009) Machining dynamics fundamentals, applications and practices, Springer London, (pp 134–136).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. H. Aghdam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aghdam, B.H., Vahdati, M. & Sadeghi, M.H. Vibration-based estimation of tool major flank wear in a turning process using ARMA models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76, 1631–1642 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6296-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6296-3

Keywords

Navigation