Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Supermarket warehouses”: stocking policies optimization in an assembly-to-order environment

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In modern assembly-to-order systems, sub-assemblies warehouse locations, dimensions, and supply are critical decisional variables. Persona et al. (Int J Prod Econ 110(1–2):147–159, 2007) affirm the structural diversity between assembly parts can largely influence the stocking policies. On the other hand, Zhang et al. (2007) and Hsu et al. (Nav Res Logist 54(5):510–523, 2007) substantiate that the problem gets more complex when it comes to choosing the correct physical locations for common assembly parts. The study at hand concentrates on components warehouse centralization/decentralization choices in an assembly-to-order (ATO) environment, which typically supplies the assembly systems with components’ kits through decentralized warehouses called “Supermarkets”. Specifically, this paper applies an innovative step-by-step procedure to support materials management decision-making policies in order to define when, how, and where it is convenient to install a supermarket warehouse, considering the typical aspect of an ATO environment: number, type, position of the assembly systems, demand rate and commonality degree of components used, internal transportation equipment and transportation costs, load unit capacity, space cost for stocking, space availability in the plant, inventory costs, and safety stock dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akçay Y, Xu SH (2004) Joint inventory replenishment and component allocation optimization in an assemble-to-order system. Manag Sci 50(1):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azzi A, Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2009) Quantificare l’Indice Annuo dei Costi di Giacenza: Modello di Calcolo e Analisi Comparativa di Casi Studio, Prooceding ANIMP 2007. 36°Convegno Nazionale Ingegneria E Impiantistica Italiana Rome, 11–12 June 2009. http://www.animp.it/news.aspx?sezione=Convegni

  3. Battini D, Faccio M, Ferrari E, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2007) Design configuration for a mixed-model assembly system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:188–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2008) Balancing–sequencing procedure for a mixed model assembly system in case of finite buffer capacity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(3–4):345–359

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bollapragada R, Rao US, Zhang J (2004) Managing inventory and supply performance in assembly systems with random supply capacity and demand. Manag Sci 50(12):1729–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi W, Lee Y (2004) A dynamic part-feeding system for an automotive assembly line. Comput Ind Eng 43(1):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chu H, Wang J, Jin Y, Suo H (2006) Decentralized inventory control in a two-component assembly system. Int J Prod Econ 102:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das C, Tyagi R (1999) Effect of correlated demands on safety stock centralization: patterns of correlation versus degree of centralization. Int J Bus Logist 20(1):205–213

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Boeck L, Vandaele N (2008) Coordination and synchronization of material flows in supply chains: an analytical approach, International. J Prod Econ 116(1):199–207

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Souza MC, De Carvalho CRV, Brizon WB (2008) Packing items to feed assembly lines. Eur J Oper Res 184(2):480–489

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Drake PR, Lee DM (2009) Component prioritisation for strategic purchasing and the case study of a South Korean elevator manufacturer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eppen GD (1979) Effects on centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Manag Sci 51(1):498–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Evers PT, Frederick BJ (1993) The portfolio effect and multiple consolidation points: a critical assessment of the square root law. J Bus Logist 14(2):109–125

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hillier MS (2000) Component commonality in multiple-period, assemble-to-order systems. IIE Transactions 32(8):755–766

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hillier MS (2002) The costs and benefits of commonality in assemble-to-order systems with a (Q, r)-policy for component replenishment. Eur J Oper Res 141(1):570–586

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsu VN, Lee CY, So KC (2007) Managing components for assemble-to-order products with lead-time-dependent pricing: the full-shipment model. Nav Res Logist 54(5):510–523

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Yeh WC (2005) A hybrid heuristic algorithm for the multistage supply chain network problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li SG, Kuo X (2008) The inventory management system for automobile spare parts in a central warehouse. Expert Systems Appl 34(1):1144–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lim SJ, Jeong SJ, Kim KS, Park MW (2006) A simulation approach for production–distribution planning with consideration given to replenishment policies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu SC, Lin CC (2005) A heuristic method for the combined location routing and inventory problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:372–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manzini R, Gamberi M, Persona A, Regattieri A (2004) A framework for designing a flexible cellular assembly system. Int J Prod Res 17(42):3505–3528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Manzini R, Persona A, Regattieri A (2006) Framework for designing and controlling a multicellular flexible manufacturing system. IJSOM 1(2):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matta A, Dallery Y, Di Mascolo M (2005) Analysis of assembly systems controlled with kanbans. Eur J Oper Res 166(1):310–336

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohebbi E, Choobineh F (2005) The impact of component commonality in an assemble-to-order environment under supply and demand uncertainty. Omega, IJMS 33(1):472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nonas LS (2009) Finding and identifying optimal inventory levels for systems with common components. Eur J Oper Res 193(1):98–119

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Persona A, Battini D, Manzini R, Pareschi A (2007) Optimal safety stock levels of subassemblies and manufacturing components. Int J Prod Econ 110(1–2):147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ronen D (1990) Inventory centralization/decentralization—the ‘square root law’ revisited again. J Bus Logist 11:129–138

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saygin C (2007) Adaptive inventory management using RFID data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1045–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stulman A (1987) Benefits of centralized stocking for the multi-centre newsboy problem with first come, first served allocation. J Oper Res Soc 38(9):827–832

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Thangam A, Uthayakumar R (2009) A two-level distribution inventory system with stochastic. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:1208–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ting PS, Hou KL, Chung KJ (2009) An accurate and reliable solution algorithm for the (Q, r) inventory system with a fixed shortage cost. Math Comput Model 49(1):128–135

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang X, Ou J, Gilbert SM (2007) Coordination of stocking decisions in an assemble to order environment. Retrieved July, 10, 2007, from Kellogg Website: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, Stradella San Nicola, 3, 36100, Vicenza, Italy

    Daria Battini, Alessandro Persona & Fabio Sgarbossa

  2. Department of Innovation in Mechanics and Management, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131, Padova, Italy

    Maurizio Faccio

Authors
  1. Daria Battini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maurizio Faccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandro Persona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabio Sgarbossa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Faccio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Battini, D., Faccio, M., Persona, A. et al. “Supermarket warehouses”: stocking policies optimization in an assembly-to-order environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50, 775–788 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2555-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2555-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation