The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 189–207 | Cite as

The evolution of regional multi-pole growth

  • Shanming Jia
  • Chenglin Qin
  • Xinyue YeEmail author
Original Paper


Regional multi-pole growth is an important spatial form of regional economic organization pattern. We construct a model of regional multi-pole growth evolution to study its mechanism based on the assumption of heterogeneous space and inseparability of the economic subject. The study concludes that the evolution of regional multi-pole growth is affected by factors such as transportation costs, economies of scale, the crowding-out effect, and the factor endowments of superior location and inferior location. Based on the condition that the factor endowment of a location remains the same, with an increased economy of scale effect and a decline in the marginal production cost advantage, location will strengthen the agglomeration layout, which does not help form regional multi-pole growth patterns. With an increase of the crowding-out effect and a decline in the marginal production cost disadvantage, location will strengthen the dispersed layout, which fosters the formation of the regional multi-pole growth pattern. When transportation costs are high, a decline in such costs strengthens the links among locations, fostering the evolution of the regional spatial organization form to shift from dispersion to agglomeration. However, when transportation costs are somewhat reduced, their further reduction leads the regional spatial organization pattern into dispersion. Therefore, under certain conditions and with a decline in transportation costs, regional multi-pole growth weakens first and then strengthens.

JEL Classification

R11 D01 O21 



Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41601111), National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17AJL011), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2015A030310523).


  1. Ago T, Hamoudi H, Lefouili Y (2015) Firm location and monopolistic competition. Pap Reg Sci. Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin RE, Okubo T (2006) Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting. J Econ Geogr 6:323–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boschma RA, Frenken K (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr 6:273–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boschma R, Frenken K (2015) Evolutionary economic geography (No. 1518). Section of Economic Geography. Utrecht University, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Brezzi M, Veneri P (2015) Assessing polycentric urban systems in the OECD: country, regional and metropolitan perspectives. Eur Plan Stud 23:1128–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christaller W (1966) Central places in southern Germany. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  7. d’Aspremont C, Ferreira RDS (2016) Oligopolistic vs. monopolistic competition: do inter-sectoral effects matter? Econ Theory 62:299–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Goei B, Burger MJ, Van Oort FG, Kitson M (2010) Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: evidence from commuting patterns, 1981–2001. Reg Stud 44:1149–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Vaus D, McAllister I (1987) Gender differences in religion: a test of the structural location theory. Am Sociol Rev 52:472–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desmet K, Rossi-Hansberg E (2014) Spatial development. Am Econ Rev 4:1211–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67:297–308Google Scholar
  12. Fan W, Treyz F, Treyz G (2000) An evolutionary new economic geography model. J Reg Sci 40:671–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frenken K, Boschma RA (2007) A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. J Econ Geogr 7:635–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedmann J (1966) Regional development policy: a case study of Venezuela, No. HT396. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujita M, Krugman P (1995) When is the economy monocentric? von Thünen and Chamberlin unified. Reg Sci Urban Econ 25:505–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujita M, Krugman P (2004) The new economic geography: past, present and the future. Pap Reg Sci 83:139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (2001) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall PG, Pain K (2006) The polycentric metropolis: learning from mega-city regions in Europe. Routledge, AbingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamnett C (1984) Gentrification and residential location theory: a review and assessment. Geogr Urban Environ Prog Res Appl 6:283–319Google Scholar
  20. Helpman E (1998) The size of regions. In: Pines D, Sadka E, Zilcha I (eds) Topics in public economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–54Google Scholar
  21. Isard W (1956) Location and space economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Jia S (2014) The mechanism of regional economic multiple poles growth. Ph.D. thesis, Jinan University, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  23. Krätke S (2001) Strengthening the polycentric urban system in Europe: conclusions from the ESDP. Eur Plan Stud 9:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krugman P (1993) On the number and location of cities. Eur Econ Rev 37:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krugman P (2011) The new economic geography, now middle-aged. Reg Stud 45:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li G, Fang C (2014) Analyzing the multi-mechanism of regional inequality in China. Ann Reg Sci 52(1):155–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lösch A (1938) The nature of economic regions. South Econ J 5:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin R, Sunley P (2015) Towards a developmental turn in evolutionary economic geography? Reg Stud 49:712–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:1695–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. North DC (1955) Location theory and regional economic growth. J Polit Econ 63:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ottaviano GIP (2011) “New” new economic geography: firm heterogeneity and agglomeration economies. J Econ Geogr 2:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perroux F (1950) Economic space: theory and applications. Q J Econ 64:89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pribadi DO, Putra AS, Rustiadi E (2015) Determining optimal location of new growth centers based on LGP–IRIO model to reduce regional disparity in Indonesia. Ann Reg Sci 54(1):89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samuelson PA (1954) The transfer problem and transport costs, II: analysis of effects of trade impediments. Econ J 64:264–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor PJ, Evans DM, Hoyler M, Derudder B, Pain K (2009) The UK space economy as practised by advanced producer service firms: identifying two distinctive polycentric city-regional processes in contemporary Britain. Int J Urban Reg Res 33:700–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Venables AJ (1996) Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. Int Econ Rev 37:341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Venables AJ (2011) Productivity in cities: self-selection and sorting. J Econ Geogr 11:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vernon R (1966) International investment and International trade in the product cycle. Q J Econ 80:190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weber A (1962) Theory of the location of industries. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsJinan UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of GeographyKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations