Different femoral rotation with navigated flexion-gap balanced or measured resection in total knee arthroplasty does not lead to different clinical outcomes

Abstract

Purpose

Femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is hypothesized to vary in the same knee depending on the method used to establish it.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients who underwent TKA surgery using a measured resection technique (RT) were compared with 40 patients who underwent a flexion-gap balancing technique with computer-assisted (for navigation) surgery (FB-CAS) to assess clinical and radiographic alignment differences at two years postoperatively. In 36 of the 40 patients in the FB-CAS group, both methods were used. Intraoperatively, the transepicondylar femoral rotation (TEFR) in reference to the transepicondylar axis was established as the rotation that balanced the flexion gap. Once the TEFR was obtained, an analogous rotation as measured by a posterior reference femoral rotation (PRFR) cutting guide was determined.

Results

Femoral component rotation determined by the TEFR and PRFR methods differed in each of the knees. The median TEFR was 0.08°±0.6° (range − 1.5°, 1.5°), and the median PRFR was 0.06°±2.8° (range − 6°, 5°). The mean difference in the rotational alignment between the TEFR and PRFR techniques was 0.01° ± 3.1°. The 95% limits of agreement between the mean differences in measurements were between 6.2° external rotation and − 6.1° internal rotation. At 2 years postoperatively, we found no differences in the radiographic or clinical American Knee Society score between the two groups.

Conclusion

Rotation of the femoral component in TKA can vary in the same knee depending on the surgical method used to establish it. This variation in femoral rotation is sufficiently small enough to have no apparent effect on the 2-year clinical outcome score.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

RT:

Measured resection technique

FB-CAS:

Flexion gap-balancing technique with computer-assisted surgery

TEFR:

Transepicondylar femoral rotation

PRFR:

Posterior reference femoral rotation

AKS:

American Knee Society score

IR:

Internal rotation

ER:

External rotation

References

  1. 1.

    Berger RA, Rubasch HE, Seel MJ, Warren HT, Crosset LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop 286:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chen Z, Wang L, Liu Y, He J, Lian Q, Li D, Jin Z (2015) Effect of component mal-rotation on the knee loading in total knee arthroplasty using multi-body dynamics modeling under a simulated walking gait. J Orthop Res 33(9):1287–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2012) Does computer assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1307–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chon JG, Sun DH, Jung JY, Kim TI, Jnag SW (2011) Rotational alignment of the femoral component for minimal medial collateral ligament release in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 23(3):153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fitz W, Jäger S, Rieger JS, Seebach E, Bitsch RG (2017) Femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of patient individualized jigs with gap balancing in relation to anatomic landmarks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1712–1719

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hanada H, Whiteside LA, Steiger J, Dyer P, Masatoshi N (2007) Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop 462:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Heesterbeek PJ, Jacobs WCH, Wymenga AB (2009) Effects of the balanced gap technique on femoral component rotation in TKA. Clin Orthop 467:1015–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hernández-Vaquero D, Noriega-Fernandez A, Fernandez-Carreira JM, Fernandez-Simon JM, Llorens de los Rios J (2014) Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(12):3127–3134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ishii Y, Noguchi Sato J, Todoroki K, Toyabe S (2014) Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament does not affect femoral rotational alignment in TKA using a gap-balance technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3121–3126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ishikawa M, Kuriyama S, Ito H, Furu M, Nakamura S, Matsuda S (2015) Kinematic alignment produces near-normal knee motion but increases contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: a case study on single implant design. Knee 22(3):206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jones CW, Jerabek SA (2018) Current role of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(7):1989–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kwangkyoun K, Jungsung K, Dokyoung L, Sohui L, Jiyoon E (2019) The accuracy of alignment determined by patient-specific instrumentation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 31(1):19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Laskin RS (1995) Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:657–660

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Matsuda S, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Ishii R (2005) Varus-valgus balance and range of movement after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:804–808

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Irate G, Iwamoto Y (2001) Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-years followup of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg 14:152–156

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Meijer MF, Reininga IH, Boerboom AL, Bulstra SK, Stevens M (2014) Does imageless computer-assisted TKA lead to improved rotational alignment or few outliers? A systematic review. Clin Orthop 472(10):3124–3133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Meric G, Gracitelli GC, Aram LJ, Swank ML, Bugbee WD (2015) Variability in distal femoral anatomy in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: measurements on 13456 computed tomography scans. J Arthroplasty 30:1835–1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmeas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Rudert M, Roth J, Hull ML (2013) How frequent is rotational mismatch within 0º + -10º in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Orthopedics 36(12):e1515–e1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pirou P, Peronne E, Ouanezar H (2013) Rotational alignment of the femoral component using trochlear navigation during total knee arthroplasty: a dual-center study of 145 cases. J Arthroplasty 28(7):1107–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Seung-Yup L, Hong-Chul L, Ki-Mo J, Ji-Hoon B (2017) What factors are associated with femoral component rotation in TKA using the gap balancing technique? Clin Orthop 475:1999–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Shen C, Tang ZH, Hu JZ, Zou GY, Xiao RC, Yan DX (2015) Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 38(3):178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2005) The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:2276–2280

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Terashima T, Onodera T, Sawagucho N, Kasahara Y, Majima T (2014) External rotation of the femoral component decreases patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3103-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    der Linden-Van Van, der Zwaag HLM, Valstar ER, Van der Molen AJ, Nelissen RGH (2008) Transepicondylar axis accuracy in computer assisted knee surgery. A comparison of the CT-based measured axis versus the CAS-determined axis. Comput Aided Surg 13(4):200–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Victor J (2009) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Sur 95:365–372

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was received for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. Hernández-Hermoso.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Ethical approval

The authors of Hospital Ethics Committee approved this work (institutional review board approval number AC-14-033) that was performed according to the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Hermoso, J.A., Nescolarde-Selva, L., Rodríguez-Montserrat, D. et al. Different femoral rotation with navigated flexion-gap balanced or measured resection in total knee arthroplasty does not lead to different clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 1805–1813 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05591-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Total knee arthroplasty
  • Femoral rotation
  • Navigation
  • Gap balancing
  • Measured resection
  • Transepicondylar axis