Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 498–506 | Cite as

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal “over-the-top” technique is safe and shows low rate of failure in skeletally immature athletes

  • Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina
  • Luca MacchiarolaEmail author
  • Cecilia Signorelli
  • Alberto Grassi
  • Federico Raggi
  • Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli
  • Stefano Zaffagnini



The aim of this study was to follow up, clinically and radiographically, skeletally immature patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal “over-the-top” technique.


Twenty athletes aged between 8 and 13 years were enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. The subjects underwent surgical ACL reconstruction between 2009 and 2013. The surgical technique consisted of a single-bundle all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis. The mean follow-up was 54 months [34–123] after surgery. Clinically, the patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively with Lysholm and KOOS scores; sport activity level was evaluated using the pre-injury, pre-operative and post-operative Tegner scores. Objective IKDC was calculated post-operatively. The joint laxity was evaluated by KT1000 and Rolimeter arthrometers. Panoramic AP standing radiographs of the lower limbs and lateral knee radiographs were also taken at the follow-up to evaluate limb length discrepancies (LLD) and axial malalignment. Normally distributed parameters were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while the non-normally distributed parameters were presented as median [25° percentile, 75° percentile].


Clinical scores showed significant (P < 0.01) improvement: Lysholm and KOOS scores improved from 40 [22; 65] and 59 [42, 73], respectively, to 100 [95; 100] and 99 [97;100] after surgery. Tegner score improved from 2 [2; 2] pre-operatively to 7 [3; 9] at follow-up (P < 0.01). At follow-up, IKDC score was A for 19 patients and one who scored B. All patients returned to sport activity and had good stability at follow-up: the KT1000 showed a median side-to-side difference of 0.0 mm [− 0.4; 1.0] for the standard force evaluation and 0.0 mm [− 1.0; 0.8] for manual-maximum test. The Rolimeter showed median side-to-site difference of 0.0 mm [− 1.0; 0.8]. Three minor leg length discrepancies and axial deviations were observed at the radiograph: one patient had 0.6 cm lengthening and 4° of varus, one had 1 cm lengthening, and one had 3° of varus (in comparison with the non-operated limb). No re-injury was observed.


This study demonstrates that the modified all-epiphyseal single-bundle “over-the-top” technique is a viable and safe option for ACL reconstruction in pediatric subjects. These results support once more that not only ACL reconstruction is a safe procedure in skeletally immature patients, but also it is highly recommended for those who want to pursue an active and sportive life.

Level of evidence

Case series, IV.


Anterior cruciate ligament Adolescents Skeletally immature Laxity ACL reconstruction Growth disturbances 



No external fundind was used.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedure performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.


  1. 1.
    Aichroth PM, Cannon WD (1992) International Knee Documentation Committee: knee ligament injury and reconstruction evaluation, eds. Knee Surgery Current Practice. Raven Press:New York, pp 759–760Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson AF, Anderson CN (2015) Correlation of meniscal and articular cartilage injuries in children and adolescents with timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:275–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson AF (2004) Transepiphyseal replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using quadruple hamstring grafts in skeletally immature patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A Suppl 1(Pt 2):201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ardern CL, Ekås G, Grindem H, Moksnes H et al (2018) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on prevention, diagnosis and management of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(4):989–1010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ashraf N, Meyer MH, Frick S, Meyer RA Jr (2007) Evidence for overgrowth after midfemoral fracture via increased RNA for mitosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:214–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chicorelli AM, Micheli LJ, Kelly M, Zurakowski D, MacDougall R (2016) Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature athlete. Clin J Sport Med 26:266–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chotel F, Henry J, Seil R, Chouteau J, Moyen B, Bérard J (2010) Growth disturbances without growth arrest after ACL reconstruction in children. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1496–1500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins MJ, Arns TA, Leroux T et al (2016) Growth abnormalities following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature patient: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 32:1714–1723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collins MJ, Prinsen CA, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM (2016) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil 24:1317–1329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cordasco FA, Mayer SW, Green DW (2017) All-inside, all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature athletes. Am J Sports Med 45:856–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dekker TJ, Rush JK, Schmitz MR (2016) What’s new in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injuries? J Pediatr Orthop. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Domzalski M, Karauda A, Grzegorzewski A, Lebiedzinski R, Zabierek S, Synder M (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transphyseal technique in prepubescent athletes: midterm, prospective evaluation of results. Arthroscopy 32:1141–1146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edwards TB, Greene CC, Baratta RV, Zieske A, Willis RB (2001) The effect of placing a tensioned graft across open growth plates. A gross and histologic analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83-A:725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fabricant PD, Jones KJ, Delos D et al (2013) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the skeletally immature athlete: a review of current concepts: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95:e28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fabricant PD, Lakomkin N, Cruz AI, Spitzer E, Marx RG (2016) ACL reconstruction in youth athletes results in an improved rate of return to athletic activity when compared with non-operative treatment: a systematic review of the literature. J ISAKOS 2015:1–8Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fabricant PD, Lakomkin N, Cruz AI, Spitzer E, Lawrence JT, Marx RG (2016) Early ACL reconstruction in children leads to less meniscal and articular cartilage damage when compared with conservative or delayed treatment. J ISAKOS 1:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faltstrom A, Hagglund M, Magnusson H, Forssblad M, Kvist J (2016) Predictors for additional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish national ACL register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:885–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Funahashi KM, Moksnes H, Maletis GB, Csintalan RP, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in adolescents with open physis: effect of recurrent injury and surgical delay on meniscal and cartilage injuries. Am J Sports Med 42:1068–1073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guzzanti V, Falciglia F, Gigante A, Fabbriciani C (1994) The effect of intra-articular ACL reconstruction on the growth plates of rabbits. J Bone Jt Surg Br 76:960–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1(3–4):226–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hui C, Roe J, Ferguson D, Waller A, Salmon L, Pinczewski L (2012) Outcome of anatomic transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Tanner stage 1 and 2 patients with open physes. Am J Sports Med 40:1093–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Inderhaug E, Stephen JM, El-Daou H, Williams A, Amis AA (2017) The effects of anterolateral tenodesis on tibiofemoral contact pressures and kinematics. Am J Sports Med 45(13):3081–3088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kay J, Memon M, Marx RG et al (2018) Over 90% of children and adolescents return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(4):1019–1036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malatray M, Raux S, Peltier A et al (2018) Ramp lesions in ACL deficient knees in children and adolescent population: a high prevalence confirmed in intercondylar and posteromedial exploration. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(4):1074–1079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F et al (1998) Arthroscopic intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gracilis and semitendinosus tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(2):68–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Seil R (2016) The ESSKA paediatric anterior cruciate ligament monitoring initiative. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:680–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Paley D (2005) Radiographic assessment of lower limb deformities. In: Paley D, Herzenberg JE (eds) Principles of deformity correction. Springer, New York, pp 31–38Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pennock A, Murphy MM, Wu M (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:445–453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pierce TP, Issa K, Festa A, Scillia AJ, McInerney VK (2017) Pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of transphyseal versus physeal-sparing techniques. Am J Sports Med 45:488–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Placella G, Bartoli M, Peruzzi M, Speziali A, Pace V, Cerulli G (2016) Return to sport activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature athletes with manual drilling original all inside reconstruction at 8 years follow-up. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50:635–638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rohman EM, Macalena JA (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9(2):130–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shifflett GD, Green DW, Widmann RF, Marx RG (2016) Growth arrest following ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft in skeletally immature patients: a review of 4 cases. J Pediatr Orthop 36:355–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Slough JM, Hennrikus W, Chang Y (2013) Reliability of Tanner staging performed by orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45:1229–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vavken P, Tepolt FA, Kocher MS (2018) concurrent meniscal and chondral injuries in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. J Pediatr Orthop 38(2):105–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang J, Xiong J, Xu Z, Shi H, Dai J, Jiang Q (2015) Short-term effects of discoid lateral meniscectomy on the axial alignment of the lower limb in adolescents. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(3):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD (2016) Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 44:1861–1876CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yoo WJ, Kocher MS, Micheli LJ (2011) Growth plate disturbance after transphyseal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature adolescent patients: an MR imaging study. J Pediatr Orthop 31(6):691–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zaffagnini S, Golanò P, Farinas O et al (2003) Vascularity and neuroreceptors of the pes anserinus: anatomic study. Clin Anat 16:19–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A et al (2017) Over-the-top ACL reconstruction plus extra-articular lateral tenodesis with hamstring tendon grafts: prospective evaluation with 20-year minimum follow-up. Am J Sports Med 45(14):3233–3242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Luca Macchiarola
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Cecilia Signorelli
    • 2
  • Alberto Grassi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Federico Raggi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stefano Zaffagnini
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica IIIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione TecnologicaIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e NeuroMotorie DIBINEMUniversità di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations