Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 412–418 | Cite as

Repair with bicortical suspension device restores proximal tibiofibular joint motion

  • Pedro Pessoa
  • Teresa Alves-da-SilvaEmail author
  • Francisco Guerra-Pinto
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint is a complex injury that is often overlooked or misdiagnosed. Surgical treatment is recommended for severe acute or for chronic symptomatic instability but there is still no evidence on the optimal reconstruction technique. The purpose of this study is to analyze the motion of the proximal tibiofibular joint after repair with a bicortical suspension device as compared to its normal kinematics.

Methods

Kinematic analysis of the proximal tibiofibular joint was performed during continuous passive motion of the knee and ankle in 7 whole body cadavers in a controlled laboratory study. The 14 knees were measured in four conditions: (1) intact; (2) repair with transarticular bicortical suspension device tensioned to 40 N; (3) the same repair tensioned to 50 N; and (4) the repair tensioned to 50 N after interosseous syndesmotic membrane sectioning.

Results

Proximal tibiofibular joint can be successfully repaired by a bicortical suspension device restoring its normal 3D spatial motion. The fixation of the PTFJ with the device tested tensioned to 40 or 50 N could restore the intact joint kinematics for every movement tested except knee internal and external rotation. The fixation to 40 N attained closer values to the intact joint in the movements that evolve the anterior PTFJ ligament. The 50 N fixation is overall more rigid than the intact joint but statistically closer to the normal PTFJ kinematics for the movements more dependent on the posterior PTFJ ligament. Sectioning of the interosseous syndesmotic membrane determined an important loss of stability of the PTFJ during the movements of ankle extension and ankle flexion. Such loss illustrates the relevance of this associated injury when planning PTFJ ligament reconstruction.

Conclusions

This study indicates that the repair of the proximal tibiofibular joint with a transarticular bicortical suspension device tensioned to 40 and 50 N can restore the normal kinematics of this joint. Based on these findings, Surgeons may consider this option as a reliable solution when planning successful treatment for proximal tibiofemoral joint instability.

Keywords

Proximal tibiofibular joint Tibiofibular instability Bicortical suspension device Kinematics Knee 

Abbreviations

CT scan

Computed tomography scan

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

N

Newton

PTFJ

Proximal tibiofibular joint

IOSM

Interosseous syndesmotic membrane

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor João Gory O´Neil and the Department of Anatomy of Medical College, Universidade Nova de Lisboa for provision of the specimens and assistance with laboratory setup. We thank Professor Ricardo Matias, Physiotherapist Mario Valerio and  PhD Candidate Rodrigo Brandão Martins who contributed towards the article by making acquisition and analysis of data. We thank Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal for providing the kinematic analysis instruments. We thank Biomet, and Arthrex for providing the medical devices.

Author contributions

PP, TAS and FGP conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, carried out the experimental study, participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. PP is the Senior Orthopaedic Surgeon of the Medical Department of a professional soccer team—Sporting Clube de Portugal. TAS and FGP are Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests with respect to the research, authorship and publication of this article. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and publication of this article.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not applicable to this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Aladin A, Lam KS, Szypryt EP (2002) The importance of early diagnosis in the management of proximal tibiofibular dislocation: a 9- and 5-year follow-up of a bilateral case. Knee 9:233–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lambert KL (1971) The weight-bearing function of the fibula. A strain gauge study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:507–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ogden JA (1974) Subluxation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 101:192–197Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ogden JA (1974) Subluxation and dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:145–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogden JA (1974) The anatomy and function of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 101:186–191Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Seymortier P, Ryckaert A, Verdonk P, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R (2008) Traumatic proximal tibiofibular dislocation. Am J Sports Med 36:793–798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turco VJ, Spinella AJ (1985) Anterolateral dislocation of the head of the fibula in sports. Am J Sports Med 13:209–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Semonian RH, Denlinger PM, Duggan RJ (1995) Proximal tibiofibular subluxation relationship to lateral knee pain: a review of proximal tibiofibular joint pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 21:248–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cazeneuve JF, Bracq H, Meeseman M (1997) Weinert and Giachino ligament arthroplasty for the surgical treatment of chronic superior tibiofibular joint instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:36–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giachino AA (1986) Recurrent dislocations of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1104–1106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horst PK, LaPrade RF (2010) Anatomic reconstruction of chronic symptomatic anterolateral proximal tibiofibular joint instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1452–1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janke M, Warzecha C, Ballmer PM (2008) Traumatic chronic instability of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Unfallchirurg 111:1033–1036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sekiya JK, Kuhn JE (2003) Instability of the proximal tibiofibular joint. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:120–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sijbrandij S (1978) Instability of the proximal tibio-fibular joint. Acta Orthop Scand 49:621–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baciu CC, Tudor A, Olaru I (1974) Recurrent luxation of the superior tibio-fibular joint in the adult. Acta Orthop Scand 45:772–777CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burkhart TA, Asa B, Payne MWC, Johnson M, Dunning CE, Wilson TD (2015) Anatomy of the proximal tibiofibular joint and interosseous membrane, and their contributions to joint kinematics in below-knee amputations. J Anat 226:143–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eichenblat M, Nathan H (1983) The proximal tibio fibular joint. An anatomical study with clinical and pathological considerations. Int Orthop 7:31–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Espregueira-Mendes JD, Vieira Da Silva M (2006) Anatomy of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:241–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bekerom MPJ, Weir A, van der Flier RE (2011) Anatomic reconstruction or temporary screw stabilization of chronic symptomatic anterolateral proximal tibiofibular joint instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1406–1408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cazeneuve JF, Bracq H (1998) Chronic instability of the proximal tibio-fibular articulation: hemi-long biceps ligamentoplasty by the Weinert and Giachino technique. Apropos of 3 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84:84–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rajkumar P, Schmitgen GF (2002) A new surgical treatment of an acute dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Int J Clin Pract 56:556–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anavian J, Marchetti DC, Moatshe G, Slette EL, Chahla J, Brady AW, Civitarese DM, LaPrade RF (2018) The forgotten joint: quantifying the anatomy of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1096–1103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marchetti DC, Chahla J, Moatshe G, Slette EL, LaPrade RF (2018) Quantitative radiographic assessment of the anatomic attachment sites of the anterior and posterior complexes of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1104–1109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marchetti DC, Moatshe G, Phelps BM, Dahl KD, Ferrari MB, Chahla J, Turnbull TL, LaPrade RF (2017) The proximal tibiofibular joint: a biomechanical analysis of the anterior and posterior ligamentous complexes. Am J Sports Med 45:1888–1892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thornes B, Walsh A, Hislop M, Murray P, O’Brien M (2003) Suture–Endobutton fixation of ankle tibio-fibular diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 24:142–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Falkenberg P, Nygaard H (1983) Isolated anterior dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65:310–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Veth RP, Kingma LM, Nielsen HK (1984) The abnormal proximal tibiofibular joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 102:167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weinert CRJ, Raczka R (1986) Recurrent dislocation of the superior tibiofibular joint. Surgical stabilization by ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:126–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHospital Ortopédico de Sant´iago do OutãoSetúbalPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHospital Dr. José d`AlmeidaAlcabideche, CascaisPortugal

Personalised recommendations