Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the survival rate and clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after MRI-based patient-specific instruments (PSI) and conventional instruments 5 years after initial surgery.
Methods
At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (0.4), 163 patients (90.6%) with a mean age of 71.8 years (8.7) were analysed. A survival analysis with revision of the TKA as endpoint was performed. The Knee Society Score (KSS), evaluations on plain radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and at each FU.
Results
At final follow-up, one TKA in the PSI- (1.2%) and 3 TKAs in the conventional group (3.8%) had undergone revision surgery (n.s.). No radiological abnormalities were noted at any time point. Postoperatively, the KSS and PROMs significantly improved within each group compared with the preoperative values. There were no clinically relevant differences for the KSS [PSI: 77.4, 9.8 (95% CI 75.0–79.7) vs. conventional: 77.3 10.5 (95% CI 74.9–79.8)] and the PROMs between both groups (n.s.) at 5 years follow-up.
Conclusion
There is still a lack of reliable data on the survival of TKA and clinical evidence, when using PSI for TKA. Longer follow-up studies are, therefore, needed.
Level of evidence
I.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Hadithy N, Rozati H, Sewell MD et al (2012) Causes of a painful total knee arthroplasty: are patients still receiving total knee arthroplasty for extrinsic pathologies? Int Orthop 36(6):1185–1189
Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53
Boonen B, Schotanus MGM, Kerens B et al (2013) Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2206–2212
Boonen B, Schotanus MGM, Kerens B et al (2016) No difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional instrumented TKA at 2 years follow-up: a multi-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Jt Journal 98-B:939–944
Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72
Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2012) Does computerassisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(7):1307–1322
Cho WS, Ahn HS, Kim MY et al (2006) Pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc 41(1):129–133
DeSouza CM, Legedza AT, Sankoh AJ (2009) An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 19(6):1055–1073
Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12
EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life Health Policy 16:199–208
Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24:39–43
Freyd M (1923) The graphic rating scale. J Ed Psych 14:83–102
Giesinger K, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Holzner B, Giesinger JM (2014) Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthr Cartil 22(2):184–189
Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M et al. (2005) A Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (433): 152–159
Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Saxena A (2013) Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):96–100
Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN (2005) Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 76(3):347–352
Lim H-A, Song E-K, Seon J-K et al (2017) Causes of Aseptic Persistent Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 9(1):50–56
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14
Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:709–714
Jeschke E, Citak M, Günster C et al (2017) Are TKAs Performed in High-volume Hospitals Less Likely to Undergo Revision Than TKAs Performed in Low-volume Hospitals? Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5463-x
Lamers LM, McDonnell J, Stalmeier PF, Krabbe PF, Busschbach JJ (2006) The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ 15:1121–1132
Leun KS (2010) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: present status and future perspectives. Chin Med J (Engl) 123:2967–2968
Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 59:77–79
Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJK, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW (2001) The effect of surgeonexperience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16(5):635–640
Mont MA, Serna FK, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS (1996) Exploration of radiographically normal total knee replacements for unexplained pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:216–220
Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(8):1010–1014
Nam D, McArthur BA, Cross MB et al (2012) Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg 25:213–219
Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:99–107
Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156
Roorda LD, Jones CA, Waltz M et al (2004) Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 63:36–42
Rolfson O, Malchau H (2015) The use of patient-reported outcomes after routine arthroplasty. Beyond the whys and ifs. Bone Jt J 97-B:578–581
Schotanus MGM, van Haaren EH, Hendrickx RPM, Jansen EJP, Kort NP (2015) Accuracy of CT-based patient specific guides for total knee arthroplasty in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis and retained metal hardware around the knee joint from previous surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(8):1313–1320
Schotanus MGM, Thijs E, Heijmans M, Vos R, Kort NP (2017) Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4637-0
Schotanus MGM, Thijs E, Boonen B et al (2017) Revision of partial knee to total knee arthroplasty with use of patient specific instruments results in acceptable femoral rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4674-8
Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):169–174
Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A et al (2017) No difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(1):9–20
Funding
No financial support was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MGMS: Designed the study, gathered and analysed all the data, wrote the initial draft of the manuscript and managed the study. BB: Ensured the accuracy of the data and the analysis, wrote and revised the manuscript. WW: Gathered and ensured the accuracy of the data and revised the manuscript. HH: Designed the study and revised the manuscript. RD: Designed the study and revised the manuscript. RB: Ensured the accuracy of the data and the analysis, wrote and revised the manuscript. RV: Ensured the accuracy of the data and analysis and revised the manuscript. LR: Ensured the accuracy of the data and revised the manuscript. NPK: Conceived the study and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
One author (NK) is a paid consultant on the PSI surgical technique for Zimmer-Biomet, Europe. The other authors certify that they have no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted manuscript.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Zuyderland-Zuyd, Number 10-T-21.
Informed consent
For this type of study formal informed consent was obtained from each included patient.
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: one of the co-author’s (W. van der Weegen) middle name has been included.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schotanus, M.G.M., Boonen, B., van der Weegen, W. et al. No difference in mid-term survival and clinical outcome between patient-specific and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1463–1468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4968-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4968-5