Medial joint line elevation of the tibia measured during surgery has a significant correlation with the limb alignment changes following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
This study aimed to determine the correlation between the change in joint line height calculated from the resected bone and insert thickness during surgery and the change in limb alignment following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). It was hypothesized that joint line elevation is correlated with the change in limb alignment.
A total of 74 consecutive patients diagnosed with either isolated medial compartmental osteoarthritis (38 patients) or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (36 patients) were included. The thickness of the proximal tibial and distal femoral bony cuts was measured during surgery; using these values, the medial joint line elevation of the tibia (MJLET) and medial joint line reduction of the femur (MJLRF) were defined. The correlation between the amount of change in the hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle before and after surgery (δHKA) and the thickness of the tibial insert (TI), MJLET, or MJLRF were evaluated.
The mean values of δHKA, TI, MJLET, and MJLRF were 5.0° ± 2.6°, 8.5 ± 0.8, 4.4 ± 1.3, and 0.0 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. The δHKA had a significant, but weak-positive correlation with the TI (P = 0.02), and moderate-positive correlation with MJLET (P < 0.001). However, no correlation was observed between δHKA and MJLRF.
The MJLET measured during surgery had a significant moderate-positive correlation with the change in limb alignment following medial UKA. For clinical relevance, the surgeon can predict postoperative limb alignment after UKA by considering, intraoperatively, both the insert thickness and the depth of resection at the proximal tibia thus minimizing technical error to obtain an optimal alignment after UKA.
Level of evidence
Diagnostic study, level II.
KeywordsUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) Joint line Alignment
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 7.Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14Google Scholar
- 8.Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 221:278–285Google Scholar
- 11.Klemme WR, Galvin EG, Petersen SA (1994) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Sequential radiographic and scintigraphic imaging with an average five-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:233–238Google Scholar
- 14.Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, Thornhill TS (1991) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 271:96–100Google Scholar
- 16.Tashiro Y, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Mizu-Uchi H, Kuwashima U, Iwamoto Y (2014) The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(12):3142–3149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Weber P, Schroder C, Laubender RP, Baur-Melnyk A, von Schulze Pellengahr C, Jansson V et al (2013) Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2468–2473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar