The Videoinsight® method: improving rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a preliminary study
- 648 Downloads
The purpose of this randomized double blind controlled study was to investigate if the vision of contemporary art video according to the Videoinsight® method could produce better short-term clinical and subjective outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
One-hundred and six patients treated with single-bundle ACL reconstruction plus extra-articular tenodesis were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to Group A (53 patients) and Group B (53 patients). Group A received one art video that was established to produce positive and therapeutic “insight”, while Group B received one art video with an “insight” unfavourable to the psychological recovery. All patients were instructed to watch the video 3 times a week for the first 2 months during the execution of the same rehabilitative protocol. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and 3 months after surgery with Tegner, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), physical and mental SF-36 scores and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Time to crutches discharge was collected at final follow-up as well.
Five patients were lost to follow-up and 101 patients (Group A: 51 patients; Group B: 50 patients) were available at mean 3.0 ± 0.2 months follow-up. Age at surgery was 33.0 ± 17.0 years. The two groups were homogeneous regarding pre-operative demographic data, meniscal lesions and clinical outcomes. Significant improvements were observed in Group A compared to Group B at final follow-up for subjective IKDC (82.0 ± 13.8 vs. 71.0 ± 19.7, p = 0.0470), TKS (28.1 ± 6.0 vs. 32.0 ± 5.8, p = 0.0141) and time to crutches discharge (20.9 ± 5.0 vs. 26.5 ± 8.2 days, p = 0.0012). A positive significant correlation between TSK and time to crutches discharge (r = 0.35, p = 0.0121) was observed.
The Videoinsight® method combined to adequate rehabilitation could be an effective tool in order to improve short-term clinical and functional outcomes in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence
KeywordsKnee Rehabilitation Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Contemporary art video Videoinsight® method
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 4182 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 4350 kb)
- 2.Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Flint F (1991) The psychological effects of modeling in athletic injury rehabilitation. University of Oregon, USA, EugeneGoogle Scholar
- 6.Ievleva L, Orlick T (1991) Mental links to enhanced recovery: an exploratory analysis. Sport Psychol 5:25–40Google Scholar
- 14.Russo RL (2011) Videoinsight®. Healing with contemporary art. Silvana Editoriale, Cinisello BalsamoGoogle Scholar
- 15.Russo RL (2013) The Videoinsight® concept. CIC Edizioni Internazionali, RomeGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schafer R (1954) Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. Grune & Stratton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sordoni C, Hall C, Forwell L (2000) The use of imagery by athletes during injury rehabilitation. J Sport Rehabil 9:329–338Google Scholar
- 18.Sordoni C, Hall C, Forwell L (2002) The use of imagery in athletic injury rehabilitation and its relationship to self-efficacy. Physiother Can 54:177–185Google Scholar
- 20.Theodorakis Y, Beneca A, Malliou P, Goudas M (1997) Examining psychological factors during injury rehabilitation. J Sport Rehabil 6:355–363Google Scholar
- 21.Zaffagnini S, Bruni D, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bonanzinga T, Lopomo N, Bignozzi S, Marcacci M (2011) Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:390–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar