A novel stress influence function (SIF) methodology for stress-constrained continuum topology optimization

Abstract

This study presents a new stress influence function (SIF) methodology for continuum topology optimization under consideration of local strength failure. Firstly, the qp-relaxation criterion is involved to circumvent the stress singularity. To deal with the large-scale stress constraints in topology optimization, the local stress constraint is reflected in the objective along with the material volume by multiplication, and the weight of stress is characterized by stress influence function. Meanwhile, three types of stress influence functions are proposed for comparison. By means of the study on the characteristic of high-stress elements, the rationality of the SIF methodology is illustrated, in which the proposed method may achieve the full-stress state of high-stress element. Numerical examples are given to demonstrate the applicability and validity of the proposed methodology. It is shown that the proposed methodology can obtain reasonable results. Consequently, the proposed SIF methodology provides a novel strategy with high computational efficiency for topology optimization considering local strength failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. Amir O (2016) Stress-constrained continuum topology optimization: a new approach based on elasto-plasticity. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:1797–1818

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi E (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruggi M (2008) On an alternative approach to stress constraints relaxation in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36:125–141

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2001) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3443–3459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng GD, Guo X (1997) ε-Relaxed approach in structural topology optimization. Struct Optim 13:258–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng GD, Jiang Z (1992) Study on topology optimization with stress constraints. Eng Optim 20:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. da Silva GA, Cardoso EL (2016) Stress-based topology optimization of continuum structures under uncertainties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 313:647–672

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duysinx P, Bendsøe MP (1998) Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress constraints. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43:1453–1478

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duysinx P, Sigmund O (1998) New developments in handling stress constraints in optimal material distribution, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

  11. Duysinx P, Van Miegroet L, Lemaire E, Brüls O, Bruyneel M (2009) Topology and generalized shape optimization: why stress constraints are so important? Int J Simul Multidiscip Des Optim 2:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleury C (1993) Sequential convex programming for structural optimization problems. In: Optimization of large structural systems. Ed. Rozvany GIN. Springer Netherlands, pp 531–553

  13. Fleury C, Braibant V (2010) Structural optimization: a new dual method using mixed variables. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23:409–428

  14. Guo X, Zhang WS, Zhong WL (2014) Stress-related topology optimization of continuum structures involving multi-phase materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 268:632–655

  15. Holmberg E, Torstenfelt B, Klarbring A (2013) Stress constrained topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:33–47

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. James KA, Waisman H (2014) Failure mitigation in optimal topology design using a coupled nonlinear continuum damage model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 268:614–631

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeong SH, Park SH, Choi D-H, Yoon GH (2012) Topology optimization considering static failure theories for ductile and brittle materials. Comput Struct 110-111:116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirsch U (1989) Optimal topologies of truss structures. Elsevier Sequoia S. A.

  19. Kirsch U (1990) On singular topologies in optimum structural design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Le C, Norato J, Bruns T, Ha C, Tortorelli D (2009) Stress-based topology optimization for continua. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41:605–620

  21. Luo YJ, Kang Z (2012) Topology optimization of continuum structures with Drucker–Prager yield stress constraints.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luo YJ, Wang MY, Kang Z (2013) An enhanced aggregation method for topology optimization with local stress constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:31–41

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mei YL, Wang XM (2004) A level set method for structural topology optimization and its applications. Adv Eng Softw 35:415–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moon SJ, Yoon GH (2013) A newly developed qp-relaxation method for element connectivity parameterization to achieve stress-based topology optimization for geometrically nonlinear structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 265:226–241

  25. París J, Navarrina F, Colominas I, Casteleiro M (2010) Block aggregation of stress constraints in topology optimization of structures. Adv Eng Softw 41:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu ZP, Liu DL, Wang L, Xia HJ (2019) Scale-span stress-constrained topology optimization for continuum structures integrating truss-like microstructures and solid material. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 355:900–925

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rozvany GIN, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1992) New optimality criteria methods: forcing uniqueness of the adjoint strains by corner-rounding at constraint intersections. Struct Optim 4:244–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rozvany GIN, Zhou M, Birker T (1992) Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Optim 4:250–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Svanberg K (2010) The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sved G, Ginos Z (1968) Structural optimization under multiple loading. Int J Mech Sci 10:803–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Takezawa A, Yoon GH, Jeong SH, Kobashi M, Kitamura M (2014) Structural topology optimization with strength and heat conduction constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 276:341–361

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Verbart A, Langelaar M, Keulen FV (2015) Damage approach: a new method for topology optimization with local stress constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53:1081–1098

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang L, Xia HJ, Zhang XY, Lyu Z (2019) Non-probabilistic reliability-based topology optimization of continuum structures considering local stiffness and strength failure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:788–809

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia HJ, Wang L, Liu YR (2020) Uncertainty-oriented topology optimization of interval parametric structures with local stress and displacement reliability constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 358:112644

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang RJ, Chen CJ (1996) Stress-based topology optimization. Struct Optim 12:98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zelickman Y, Amir O Topology optimization with stress constraints using isotropic damage with strain Softening, in: advances in structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2018, pp. 991–1008

  38. Zhang WS, Guo X, Wang MY, Wei P (2013) Optimal topology design of continuum structures with stress concentration alleviation via level set method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93:942–959

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang WS, Li D, Zhou JH, Du ZL, Li BJ, Guo X (2018) A moving morphable void (MMV)-based explicit approach for topology optimization considering stress constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 334:381–413

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang WS, Li DD, Kang PS, Guo X, Youn S-K (2020) Explicit topology optimization using IGA-based moving morphable void (MMV) approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 360:112685

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu JH, Zhang WH, Xia L (2015) Topology optimization in aircraft and aerospace structures design. Arch Comput Methods Eng 23:595–622

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFB0200700), the National Nature Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China (No. 11432002 and No. 11602012), and the Defense Industrial Technology Development Program (Nos. JCKY2016204B101 and JCKY2017601B001). Besides, the authors wish to express their many thanks to the reviewers for their useful and constructive comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiping Qiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

The replication of results part is available in the supplementary material, in which the whole source code for Fig. 3 and the part source code for Fig. 9 are given.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Xu Guo

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 205 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, H., Qiu, Z. A novel stress influence function (SIF) methodology for stress-constrained continuum topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02615-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stress influence function
  • Continuum topology optimization
  • Local strength failure
  • Local stress constraint