An active learning reliability method with multiple kernel functions based on radial basis function

Abstract

Surrogate models combined with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) are effective ways to address failure probability problems, which involve time-consuming computer codes, in structural reliability analysis. Recently, many active learning functions based on the Kriging model have been developed to conduct adaptive sequential sampling due to its predicted value and variance. However, effective methods for learning functions based on other surrogate models to address failure probability problems remain sparse. Hence, this paper presents a new adaptive sampling function that combines the radial basis function (RBF) approximate model with MCS to calculate the failure probability of structures. The new learning function is named the active RBF method with multiple kernel functions and Monte Carlo simulation (ARBFM-MCS). It uses several RBF kernel functions to estimate the local uncertainty of the predicted values based on interquartile range (IQR) to formulate the active learning function. This method can establish several surrogate models simultaneously for application to different problems. The stopping criterion of this method is that if one of the errors calculated by the various RBF models meets the demand, the learning process stops automatically. Furthermore, the method is also compared with the k-fold cross-validation approach based on a single RBF kernel function and some other approaches presented in the literature. Six numerical examples are considered to verify the accuracy and the efficiency of the proposed method. The results reveal that the multiple kernel function method is effective and has the same accuracy level as other methods. Moreover, for these examples, the method often calls the limit state function in fewer times to obtain accurate failure probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Aute V, Saleh K, Abdelaziz O, Azarm S, Radermacher R (2013) Cross-validation based single response adaptive design of experiments for Kriging metamodeling of deterministic computer simulations. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(3):581–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basudhar A, Missoum S, Sanchez AH (2008) Limit state function identification using support vector machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains. Probab Eng Mech 23(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bdour T, Guiffaut C, Reineix A (2016) Use of adaptive Kriging metamodeling in reliability analysis of radiated susceptibility in coaxial shielded cables. IEEE T Electromagn C 58(1):95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben Salem M, Roustant O, Gamboa F, Tomaso L (2017) Universal prediction distribution for surrogate models. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif 5(1):1086–1109

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bichon BJ, Eldred MS, Swiler LP, Mahadevan S, McFarland JM (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourinet JM (2016) Rare-event probability estimation with adaptive support vector regression surrogates. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 150:210–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourinet JM, Deheeger F, Lemaire M (2011) Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines. Struct Saf 33(6):343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chau MQ, Han X, Bai YC, Jiang C (2012) A structural reliability analysis method based on radial basis function. Comput Mater Con 27(2):128–142

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chau MQ, Han X, Jiang C, Bai YC, Tran TN, Truong VH (2014) An efficient PMA based reliability analysis technique using radial basis function. Eng Comput 31(6):1098–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen W, Fu ZJ, Chen CS (2014a) Recent advances in radial basis function collocation methods. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen ZZ, Qiu HB, Gao L, Li XK, Li PG (2014b) A local adaptive sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using Kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(3):401–416

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen ZZ, Peng SP, Li XK, Qiu HB, Xiong HD, Gao L, Li PG (2015) An important boundary sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using Kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52(1):55–70

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng J, Li QS, Xiao RC (2008) A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 23(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chojaczyk AA, Teixeira AP, Neves LC, Cardoso JB, Soares CG (2015) Review and application of artificial neural networks models in reliability analysis. Struct Saf 52(3):78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng J (2006) Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network. Int J Solids Struct 43(11–12):3255–3291

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deng J, Gu DS, Li XB, Yue ZQ (2005) Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network. Struct Saf 27(1):25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duan LB, Xiao NC, Hu ZH, Li GY, Cheng AG (2017) An efficient lightweight design strategy for body-in-white based on implicit parameterization technique. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(5):1927–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dubourg V, Sudret B, Deheeger F (2013) Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 33:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M, Relun N (2013) A combined importance sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaspar B, Teixeira AP, Soares CG (2014) Assessment of the efficiency of Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis. Probabilist Eng Mech 37:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaspar B, Teixeira AP, Soares CG (2017) Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 165:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Global sensitivity analysis-enhanced surrogate (GSAS) modeling for reliability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(3):501–521

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2002) On sequential sampling for global metamodeling in engineering design. In: The ASME 2002 design engineering technical conferences and computer and information in engineering conference, Montreal, Canada, 29 September-2 October

  25. Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim 13(4):455–492

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaymaz I (2005) Application of Kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 27(2):133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Keshtegar B, Chakraborty S (2018) A hybrid self-adaptive conjugate first order reliability method for robust structural reliability analysis. Appl Math Model 53:319–332

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kleijnen JP, Beers WV (2004) Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: Kriging metamodelling. J Oper Res Soc 55(8):876–883

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li X, Li X, Su Y (2016a) A hybrid approach combining uniform design and support vector machine to probabilistic tunnel stability assessment. Struct Saf 61:22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li GJ, Lu ZZ, Li LY, Ren B (2016b) Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties analysis based on non-probabilistic reliability and its Kriging solution. Appl Math Model 40(9):5703–5716

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li X, Gong CL, Gu LX, Gao WK, Jing Z, Su H (2018) A sequential surrogate method for reliability analysis based on radial basis function. Struct Saf 73:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu X, Wu YZ, Wang BX, Ding JW, Jie HX (2017) An adaptive local range sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using support vector machine and Kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(6):2285–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lv ZY, Lu ZZ, Wang P (2015) A new learning function for Kriging and its application to solve reliability problems in engineering. Comput Math Appl 70(5):1182–1197

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pan QJ, Dias D (2017) An efficient reliability method combining adaptive support vector machine and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 67:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Romero VJ, Swiler LP, Giunta AA (2004) Construction of response surface based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation. Struct Saf 26(2):201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schueremans L, Van Gemert D (2005) Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 27(3):246–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tong C, Sun ZL, Zhao QL, Wang QB, Wang S (2015) A hybrid algorithm for reliability analysis combining Kriging and subset simulation importance sampling. J Mech Sci Technol 29(8):3183–3193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Viana FA, Haftka RT, Steffen V (2009) Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(4):439–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiao NC, Zuo MJ, Guo W (2018a) Efficient reliability analysis based on adaptive sequential sampling design and cross-validation. Appl Math Model 58:404–420

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xiao NC, Zuo MJ, Zhou CN (2018b) A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xiong FF, Greene S, Chen W, Xiong Y, Yang S (2010) A new sparse grid based method for uncertainty propagation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41:335–349

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang XF, Liu YS, Gao Y, Zhang YS, Gao ZZ (2015) An active learning Kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis with both random and interval variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(5):1003–1016

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang XF, Liu YS, Fang XY, Mi CY (2018) Estimation of low failure probability based on active learning Kriging model with a concentric ring approaching strategy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(3):1175–1186

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yun WY, Lu ZZ, Jiang X (2018a) An efficient reliability analysis method combining adaptive Kriging and modified importance sampling for small failure probability. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(4):1383–1393

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yun WY, Lu ZZ, Jiang X (2018b) A modified importance sampling method for structural reliability and its global reliability sensitivity analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(6):1625–1641

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang LG, Lu ZZ, Wang P (2015) Efficient structural reliability analysis method based on advanced Kriging model. Appl Math Model 39(2):781–793

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Y, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2019) General surrogate adaptive sampling using interquartile range for design space exploration. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2213

  48. Zheng PJ, Wang CM, Zong ZH, Wang LQ (2017) A new active learning method based on the learning function U of the AK-MCS reliability analysis method. Eng Struct 148:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beibei Sun.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Raphael Haftka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, L., Sun, B. & Ibrahim, D.S. An active learning reliability method with multiple kernel functions based on radial basis function. Struct Multidisc Optim 60, 211–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02210-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Radial basis function
  • Active learning function
  • Surrogate model
  • Reliability analysis
  • Monte Carlo simulation